Bring Back the Interlocking Helmet Logo Full-Time
Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?
I thought everyone had an email to use for spam. If not, make one today!You have to enter an e-mail to sign. That means you’ll get hit with a bunch of change.org spam.
Gotta bring that Russell Athletic Croom swag back. We only want the best and why won’t they give it to us?That logo belongs back in the 90's where it came from
When they brought it back two years ago against Kentucky I was hoping we would see it again. The marketing team nailed it and then poof. It was like a vapor.That logo is the best helmet logo that we’ve ever had. Period, 100%
View attachment 856766
That is a good looking uniform. We may suck, but we’d look good doing it.
Because they are too embarrassed to bring it back tooGotta bring that Russell Athletic Croom swag back. We only want the best and why won’t they give it to us?
Nobody outside of Mississippi State fans knows if that says MSU, SMU, USM, JSU, SUM, SJM, or any other possible combination. Clearly not a recognizable distinction from any other school and just downright yuglyThat logo is the best helmet logo that we’ve ever had. Period, 100%
View attachment 856766
That is a good looking uniform. We may suck, but we’d look good doing it.
I mean … it’s pretty clear.Nobody outside of Mississippi State fans knows if that says MSU, SMU, USM, JSU, SUM, SJM, or any other possible combination. Clearly not a recognizable distinction from any other school and just downright yugly
Is Bama’s “A” for Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, or Alaska? I have trouble determining.Nobody outside of Mississippi State fans knows if that says MSU, SMU, USM, JSU, SUM, SJM, or any other possible combination. Clearly not a recognizable distinction from any other school and just downright yugly
Was brought back in 2014. Best season ever.When they brought it back two years ago against Kentucky I was hoping we would see it again. The marketing team nailed it and then poof. It was like a vapor.
Because they heard Hadad say the one on the right and...... lemmings.Can someone explain to me why the logo on the right gets all the love, but we never hear the logo on the left mentioned?
View attachment 856836
The one on the left is more classic and timeless imo.
The 2014 uniform was based off the '96-'03 uniform but it wasn't exactly the same. The one worn against Kentucky was essentially identical except for the Adidas logo and the larger interlock on the sleeves.Was brought back in 2014. Best season ever.
Good luck with that. I wouldn't care if we wore 1979 Ford Truck green, just so long as we were competitive.How about we just field a competitive team, so that the fashion show is less significant?
Either one works for me.Can someone explain to me why the logo on the right gets all the love, but we never hear the logo on the left mentioned?
View attachment 856836
The one on the left is more classic and timeless imo.
I've never thought the 1986-95 logo looked like MSJ. Why? Because I grew up associating it with Mississippi State football. I don't read it like a word or initials. That's the point of a logo: It immediately represents something bigger, in this case, a sports team. You don't have to "read" a logo. Just look at the Disney logo. You don't sit there and sound out the word Disney. You see it and immediately think of everything that you associate with Disney. Nobody thinks Disney should change their logo because the first letter doesn't look like a D.Because they heard Hadad say the one on the right and...... lemmings.
The 86-95 logo does look better and I liked it. Especially in 1986. But the internet State fans always finding something to ***** about ... called it MSJ.
The interlocking MSUThe 2014 uniform was based off the '96-'03 uniform but it wasn't exactly the same. The one worn against Kentucky was essentially identical except for the Adidas logo and the larger interlock on the sleeves.
Uhhh...the interlocking MSU wasn't worn in 2014.The interlocking MSU
I'm of the completely opposite opinion. 96-03 logo is much bolder and crisper. 86-95 is too vertical and way too much white in the actual logo. I like it fine back then, but when the 96 logo came out I thought, wow this is so much better.Can someone explain to me why the logo on the right gets all the love, but we never hear the logo on the left mentioned?
View attachment 856836
The one on the left is more classic and timeless imo.
Thought we brought back commemorative uniforms for 98 Championship team that year? I could be wrongUhhh...the interlocking MSU wasn't worn in 2014.
We just wore the 2014 helmets with the 98 uniforms in that game.Thought we brought back commemorative uniforms for 98 Championship team that year? I could be wrong
This is so ignorant. I bet bama fans sure are glad they didn't change uniforms in the 90s when they had all their sh*t show going. When you have an awesome classic look that is universally (as much as a small market school like ours can be universally) liked by almost anyone that doesn't wear braided belts and carry a phone case on their hip, you don't go away from it for some dumba** reason like bad juju.Biggest thing I remember is what an absolute embarrassing train wreck the football team was under that logo. The program needed a new face and identity by 2003. Mississippi State needed anything to separate itself from counterfeit bills, drugs, arrest, and the NCAA investigation.
for all you young people, just think of last years team performance combined with all the above. What a terrible situation it was.