I realize my opinion is probably the minority. I just think our national champion should be able be at par after 4 rounds if he is playing well enough to win.They can break par, they just can't do it for 4 straight days. Nothing wrong with that.
I realize my opinion is probably the minority. I just think our national champion should be able be at par after 4 rounds if he is playing well enough to win.They can break par, they just can't do it for 4 straight days. Nothing wrong with that.
If the greens are truly that fast, then you will encounter many good shots into the green being penalized instead of rewarded. You also eliminate the true putting stroke being taken away. There is a difference between fast (Augusta) and stupid. It will be interesting to see how the scores are heading into the w/e and if the USGA decides to put their thumbprint on the course even more.
UKO says this exact same thing every year LOL. EVERY year.
Please only players who can break 100 post here.
Thanks,
Someone will be under par after day one. The pros are so used to playing on perfect courses set up for birdies and putting contests they just can't handle it when a course is set up that makes par the goal.
Is Bubba gonna keep his head when he misses a 2 foot putt and it rolls 20 feet and off the green?
You enjoy rooting for the biggest pricks in golf, or you actually think one of those two are going to win?
Agree. The US Open is supposed to push the best players in the world to their max and Oakmont is a perfect place to do that. If you want to see these guys score low have them play at our your local club. For me, I want to see the best tested to the max.Caught the tree story last night, that's really fascinating. Can only imagine the rift that created in the club.
Anth said it, and I've said it a hundred times, but 'Live From...' is such an awesome show for the Majors -- so well produced. Great work viewing in the background all day long.
Oakmont is the 6th ranked course in the country, and has been top 10 the entire time any of us have been alive -- Sure it will be terrible, though [eyeroll]. Other than the rough, not much the USGA can do to that track, it is what it is ----> the toughest test in golf, by most accounts. As mentioned, it rolls at 14 for the MEMBERS (faster than typical Augusta), and will likely be slowed down if anything.
If it's not, who cares? Anything unfair regarding the greens will not be intentional on the USGA's part. The champion will be the one who is able to deal with it the best, which is the case in any tournament.
Boo Hoo at -22 not being the winning score, I love it. :fire:opcorn:
Not sure why. He is 100% right to tell them to take a hike. Nothing bothers me more at sporting venues than grown *** men acting like idiots around children.A little bit of a controversy for Speith leading into the US Open on signing autographs.
A little bit of a controversy for Speith leading into the US Open on signing autographs.
Always amazed at how many UK fans turn out and WAIT forever to get UK Players autographs.At my current age I feel like an absolute loser asking for an autograph. Now, there are a few autographed items I would purchase, but running around getting autographs is just weird for men.
Nice call Glenn.One note on the TV coverage that was not in the original post. It only lists FS1 on Thursday and Friday from 10-5. According to my program guide it switches to Fox network coverage from 5-8 on both days. Another 6 hours of coverage.
This may help him at Oakmont:Wish Rickie was playing better. Seems like this place could be good for his game.
I normally like Johnny Miller but having him at Oakmont would be like locking a drunk in a brewery.<---Has a special place in my heart for Johnny Miller. He will be back at majors this year at the British.
At Oakmont, Lee Trevino used to bet guys that he would hit from the back tees and spot his opponent a green in regulation but only if he got to place their ball on the green himself. He never lost a match playing that way.
I won't pretend to be as knowledgeable about players and stats as some of you guys are. I've learned a lot in the two golf threads and I thank you all for that.
I did notice a name that hasn't been mentioned as a "sleeper" to win the tournament and was wondering what some of you guys thought. Colt Knost, he has been sneaky good the past several tournaments. I'm pretty indifferent to the guy but have noticed his name quite a bit lately.