Doesn’t change the fact that you whined like a baby. Typical maga behavior, every accusation is a confession
USPS - Mail ballots
- Thread starter TigerGrowls
- Start date
You are living proof of this reality. I brought you a tissue though
Ignorance is bliss. The burden of intellect is not without cost. So I could understand this broad generalization. Doesn’t change the fact that my life is infinitely better than yours
Doubtful for someone who thought dementia joe was sharp as a tack. We do need people to bag our groceries and flip our pizzas though, so thanks for your contributions (as small as they may be)
None of this has anything to do with trump's continued court wins over dems though
I never said that about Joe Biden. I don’t do either of those jobs. And ignoring the law ≠ court wins
"Ignoring the law" lol
Florida re-drew and democrat grifter marc Elias lost in court on that too
I don't know how you can say blacks won't be represented..they have a vote, whomever they elect represents them. Are blacks in NY not represented by Schumer, men are not represented in AOCs district?
It's equivalent to saying whites aren't represented in Jim Clyburn's district, or Byron Donald's district.
And, I don't agree with this mid census redistricting. It sets a trend, and republicans will pay for it in the future.
That might be one of the biggest flexes I've ever seen on this site, enjoy the pizza. Respect.
Kids got me a little wood fired oven last year. Stilll haven’t perfected flame maintenance, but I can make it work.
We Deliver For YOU: Summary of Key Mechanics and Provisions
Step 1 - The federal government is building a state-by-state list of US citizens eligible to vote using the Department of Homeland Security and drawing on Social Security Administration data. It then delivers to each state its specific list through that state’s own chief election official. (The List of Federally Vetted Voters)
Step 2 - The individual state election officials then do their own proprietary internal comparisons - their existing lists vs The Federally Vetted Voters list. A mail-ballot state then first notifies the Postal Service 90 DAYS before a federal election whether it will permit mail voting in the upcoming election.
Then the state submits to the U.S Postal Service 60 DAYS out from the election THEIR list of voters that the state intends to officially mail ballots to. The Postal Service in turn will not transmit a ballot to anyone in that state not on the state-generated official specific voter list.
Step 3 - The U.S. Attorney General will prioritize the investigation and prosecution of state and local officials who issue federal election ballots to ineligible individuals and it directs agencies to withhold federal funds from jurisdictions that refuse to comply.
The list submitted by the states back to the U.S. Postal Service for eligible voters in Step 2 can be instantly computer matched by the federal government with The Federally Vetted Voters list originally sent by them to that state. The Federally ineligible ballots, by number, name and address, that are to be mailed out will then be instantly known to both state officials and the federal government.
Then a meeting can take place and state election officials who mailed or attempted to mail valid federal election ballots to known non-citizens (or even non-persons) in a federal election can explain why what they did or attempted to do was lawful or they alternatively can be charged with federal election crimes.
Our thanks to @amuse for the great article below
Update: Politicians in Black Robes are issuing feckless block orders to stop the administration from showing state election officers WHO the legal Federal voters are in their states.
WHY?
Because the state officials are then ON NOTICE.
Remember the US Post Office will deliver and track a ballot to every single name provided to them by the State. Even if it's to be mailed to Mickey Mouse in The Mouse House on Main Street.
But if Mickey isn't a legal Federal voter, well then, Ding Dong! - The Fed's will be visiting after the election to have a list reconciliation discussion.
More below ...
We Deliver For YOU: Summary of Key Mechanics and Provisions
Step 1 - The federal government is building a state-by-state list of US citizens eligible to vote using the Department of Homeland Security and drawing on Social Security Administration data. It then delivers to each state its specific list through that state’s own chief election official. (The List of Federally Vetted Voters)
Step 2 - The individual state election officials then do their own proprietary internal comparisons - their existing lists vs The Federally Vetted Voters list. A mail-ballot state then first notifies the Postal Service 90 DAYS before a federal election whether it will permit mail voting in the upcoming election.
Then the state submits to the U.S Postal Service 60 DAYS out from the election THEIR list of voters that the state intends to officially mail ballots to. The Postal Service in turn will not transmit a ballot to anyone in that state not on the state-generated official specific voter list.
Step 3 - The U.S. Attorney General will prioritize the investigation and prosecution of state and local officials who issue federal election ballots to ineligible individuals and it directs agencies to withhold federal funds from jurisdictions that refuse to comply.
The list submitted by the states back to the U.S. Postal Service for eligible voters in Step 2 can be instantly computer matched by the federal government with The Federally Vetted Voters list originally sent by them to that state. The Federally ineligible ballots, by number, name and address, that are to be mailed out will then be instantly known to both state officials and the federal government.
Then a meeting can take place and state election officials who mailed or attempted to mail valid federal election ballots to known non-citizens (or even non-persons) in a federal election can explain why what they did or attempted to do was lawful or they alternatively can be charged with federal election crimes.
Our thanks to @amuse for the great article below
Department of Homeland Security
I have a huge problem with DHS being any part of the election process.
I agree, let the states do what they're supposed to do...and that includes, fund their own elections without federal money
Looks like a win for the good guys.
BOOOM! BIG WIN FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY!
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals just AFFIRMED the denial of Democrats’ attempt to block President Trump’s executive order on mail-in voting rules.
The left sued the day after the order dropped. They lost at the district court.
They just lost again on appeal.
The order stands.
Secure elections move forward.
BOOOM! BIG WIN FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY!The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals just AFFIRMED the denial of Democrats’ attempt to block President Trump’s executive order on mail-in voting rules.
The left sued the day after the order dropped. They lost at the district court.
They just lost again on appeal.
The order stands.
Secure elections move forward.
Democrats just ****** themselves so hard into a Supreme Court showdown over mail ballots that it should be studied as a masterclass in suicidal stupidity.
These absolute clowns couldn’t stop suing. Twenty-three blue-state ******** plus D.C. sprinted to that Obama-appointed hack Indira Talwani in Massachusetts and got Trump’s ballot-tracking order frozen.
She actually wrote that the Constitution forbids the president from making mailed ballots trackable because ... get this ... it might “confuse” or “disenfranchise” the same people who already lose their own mail. The First Circuit rubber-stamped that garbage like the partisan bootlickers they are.
But no, that wasn’t enough. The same ******* NGOs and blue attorneys then filed a second lawsuit in D.C. for extra insurance. That’s when the nuclear own-goal detonated. The D.C. court and the D.C. Circuit turned around and said the complete opposite: the challenge was premature, the rules weren’t final, and the real harm was to the administration. Instant circuit split. SCOTUS yanked the case and ordered briefs by Monday.
While the entire media circus and the professional outrage machine stayed glued to the SAVE Act ... the high-drama, sixty-vote, birth-certificate circus that still can’t get past the Senate filibuster ... the real, durable, lower-friction win slipped right through the side door.
Barcodes.
Real-time tracking.
Official Election Mail logos that work exactly like the Amazon package confirmation every American already uses without crying racism. Federal gating via citizenship lists. Chain-of-custody data that turns “mysteriously disappeared” red-county ballots into prosecutable evidence instead of shrugged-off “glitches.”
No new voter burdens. No endless provisional-ballot sob stories for the networks. No 60-vote Senate math. Just existing postal authority turning the mailstream into an auditable checkpoint that sticks once it’s live.
Progressives sued so ******* hard in two friendly courts that they accidentally delivered the higher-value fight straight to the only court that can end their ****. Ruthless. Self-inflicted. And the most delicious part is they still don’t even realize how badly they just bent themselves over.
(article below)
No dpic. He is going to ensure that millions of fake mail ballots are not sent out. Citizens with a valid reason can still vote by mail.
A three pronged strategy that’s been underway since Trump took office again.
Secure and verify citizenship for all mail in ballots through the Post Office by using a federal list of citizens, that has ALREADY been compiled with the help of DOGE.
And FORCE all states to cleanse their voter registration rolls using the same federal list for verification.
The democrats found rogue judges to try and stop it and now the Supreme Court will get the final say.
This was ALWAYS the plan.
It is illegal for non-citizens to vote in federal elections.
States are “legally required” to prevent noncitizens from voting in federal elections.
They are also “legally required” to cleanse noncitizens, dead people and people that have moved out of state from their voter registration rolls and keep them updated.
State election officials have not done their job and followed the law.
They are going to be “legally” FORCED to do their job and if they don’t, they’ve all been notified that they will be prosecuted.
Trump has the law on his side and that’s why he welcomes these lawsuits.
He’s ACTUALLY putting the SAVE Act in place and doesn’t need the Senate to do anything.
The LAWS were ALREADY on the books, just not being enforced.
Checkmate.
Makes sense.
NEW: Obama-appointed Judge Indira Talwani—who just blocked Trump’s mail-voting order nationwide—received a Workers Justice Award from the Chinese Progressive Association, a pro-China “partner of the PRC.”
The group works with the Chinese Consulate, including sponsoring a PRC flag-raising ceremony at Boston City Hall.
NEW: Obama-appointed Judge Indira Talwani—who just blocked Trump’s mail-voting order nationwide—received a Workers Justice Award from the Chinese Progressive Association, a pro-China “partner of the PRC.”
The group works with the Chinese Consulate, including sponsoring a PRC flag-raising ceremony at Boston City Hall.
MIKE LEE JUST DROPPED THE NUCLEAR OPTION An activist judge is blocking Trump’s Postal Service rules that would actually secure mail-in ballots.
List required.
Barcode tracking required.
Senator Mike Lee says Trump should go nuclear:
Invoke certiorari before judgment and force SCOTUS to rule NOW.
Not next year.
Not after the midterms.
RIGHT NOW.
They’re running out the clock on election integrity again.
Todays ruling is good but there is still a 2nd injunction that was not addressed yet. Still to come.
MAJOR SCOTUS VICTORY on Mail-in-Ballots Rules...Lifts Ban on 23 States
The Supreme Court has just overruled a block placed by an Obama Judge preventing Trump's Executive Order to implement safeguards for Mail-in-Ballots.
The ruling now means states must:
-Turn over a list of every voter getting a ballot
-Put unique serialized barcodes on both the outgoing and return envelopes
If a state refuses, USPS will not deliver those ballots.
This is a major election integrity win.
===
What are you doing Benny?? Your tweet is materially misleading as a statement of what today’s ruling currently requires. As it takes requirements from the separate Postal Service final rule, attributes them directly to today’s Supreme Court ruling, and omits the separate injunction that still blocks those requirements for the November 3, 2026 election.
You posted: “States must turn over a list of every voter getting a ballot.” That is FALSE as a statement of what today’s Supreme Court ruling requires. Partly accurate only as a description of what the Postal Service rule would require if it becomes enforceable. The Supreme Court expressly said Section 3 of the Executive Order itself “imposes no legal requirements on the States.”
You tweeted: “Put unique serialized barcodes on both the outgoing and return envelopes.” This is FALSE as a statement that today's Supreme Court ruling itself presently imposed that requirement. Accurate as a description of the Postal Service final rule, which is not enforce even after today's ruling. I certainly hope it will be.
You tweeted: “If a state refuses, USPS will not deliver those ballots.” Overbroad and presently FALSE, even after today's SCOTUS ruling. @bennyjohnsonp
MAJOR SCOTUS VICTORY on Mail-in-Ballots Rules...Lifts Ban on 23 StatesThe Supreme Court has just overruled a block placed by an Obama Judge preventing Trump's Executive Order to implement safeguards for Mail-in-Ballots.
The ruling now means states must:
-Turn over a list of every voter getting a ballot
-Put unique serialized barcodes on both the outgoing and return envelopes
If a state refuses, USPS will not deliver those ballots.
This is a major election integrity win.
===
What are you doing Benny?? Your tweet is materially misleading as a statement of what today’s ruling currently requires. As it takes requirements from the separate Postal Service final rule, attributes them directly to today’s Supreme Court ruling, and omits the separate injunction that still blocks those requirements for the November 3, 2026 election.
You posted: “States must turn over a list of every voter getting a ballot.” That is FALSE as a statement of what today’s Supreme Court ruling requires. Partly accurate only as a description of what the Postal Service rule would require if it becomes enforceable. The Supreme Court expressly said Section 3 of the Executive Order itself “imposes no legal requirements on the States.”
You tweeted: “Put unique serialized barcodes on both the outgoing and return envelopes.” This is FALSE as a statement that today's Supreme Court ruling itself presently imposed that requirement. Accurate as a description of the Postal Service final rule, which is not enforce even after today's ruling. I certainly hope it will be.
You tweeted: “If a state refuses, USPS will not deliver those ballots.” Overbroad and presently FALSE, even after today's SCOTUS ruling. @bennyjohnsonp
So after tying this up in courts for months scotus says its too late to implement for the November elections. SCOTUS has screwed over American citizens multiple times this year on election and citizenship issues.
No, the Supreme Court did not kill Trump’s USPS mail-ballot rule. SCOTUS parked the rule until after November by saying it was too late to change the mail process.
People are also lying when they say the proposed rule would make USPS run a citizenship check at the post office sorting machines. The truth is USPS would institute a handling standard. Noncompliant ballots would be refused and sent back. The midterms will unfortunately keep the old mail process, and bad ballots will still go through USPS.
The fight to put this rule in force is still alive. It’s just delayed.
Brett Kavanaugh said there is a fair prospect the Postal Service has the statutory power to require approved envelopes, unique barcodes, and state lists of who is getting a mail ballot. He still blocked the 2026 rollout because imposing those changes this late would be arbitrary and capricious. Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented. They said some of the plaintiffs lack standing, the states’ claim that USPS had no power to issue the rule is a Hail Mary, and the same parties now calling the rule too close to the election spent months tying it up in court.
That’s today’s real SCOTUS ruling. The claim that the Court buried mail-ballot security is the part everyone is getting wrong. SCOTUS delayed a fix and left a flawed mail-in system in place for the midterms. That’s a travesty.
No, the Supreme Court did not kill Trump’s USPS mail-ballot rule. SCOTUS parked the rule until after November by saying it was too late to change the mail process.
People are also lying when they say the proposed rule would make USPS run a citizenship check at the post office sorting machines. The truth is USPS would institute a handling standard. Noncompliant ballots would be refused and sent back. The midterms will unfortunately keep the old mail process, and bad ballots will still go through USPS.
The fight to put this rule in force is still alive. It’s just delayed.
Brett Kavanaugh said there is a fair prospect the Postal Service has the statutory power to require approved envelopes, unique barcodes, and state lists of who is getting a mail ballot. He still blocked the 2026 rollout because imposing those changes this late would be arbitrary and capricious. Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented. They said some of the plaintiffs lack standing, the states’ claim that USPS had no power to issue the rule is a Hail Mary, and the same parties now calling the rule too close to the election spent months tying it up in court.
That’s today’s real SCOTUS ruling. The claim that the Court buried mail-ballot security is the part everyone is getting wrong. SCOTUS delayed a fix and left a flawed mail-in system in place for the midterms. That’s a travesty.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court just BLOCKED President Trump from implementing his landmark US Postal Service mail-in ballot election security rules, a MAJOR LOSS ahead of the midtermsKavanaugh says in the ruling IT'S TOO LATE FOR THE MIDTERMS.
Absolute PATRIOTS Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito dissent
Un-freaking-believable!!
ROGUE JUDGES have succeeded in holding this policy up until last mintue.
Looks like the USPS security attempts before the midterms are done, aside from DOJ surging monitors to make sure there is no foul play
SCOTUS: "The Government is unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge to the District Court’s preliminary injunction. And the equitable factors applicable for obtaining emergency relief from this Court do not favor a stay"
KAVANAUGH: "Applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections."
Dewey Screwum & Howe: SCOTUS Predictably Fails US Voters
Despite the ridiculous new SCOTUS ruling this new USPS effort is already a big win for national election integrity. Why?
Because the official lists of Federally Eligible Voters by state NOW EXIST and state election officials are ON NOTICE that they exist and that they are available to them.
These lists show EVERYONE who the LEGAL FEDERAL VOTERS are in each state well before the November elections. As in - who is a living US citizen.
State election officials are going to be personally wary of the future consequences of their sending any ballots to people that are not on these Federal lists - no matter who tells them it's fine to do so.
Especially after being put on written notice last week by the @TheJusticeDept and @AAGDhillon
These state and county officials don't give a fig about what Big Cheat or Marc Elias says because they are the people who will be PERSONALLY liable for aiding and abetting any possible 2026 election fraud.
Remember that the @USPS here will now deliver a ballot to every single name provided to them by state officials. Even if it's mailed to Mickey Mouse in The Mouse House on Main Street, the @USPS WILL deliver it.
But if Mickey isn't a living legal Federal voter well then, "Ding Dong!" - @AAGDhillon will have her friends visit after the election to have a list reconciliation 'discussion.' And that discussion could become. very unpleasant. MORE ->
Get back to us all when you find absolutely bulletproof evidence that any appreciable fraud ever took place in 2020.
You all know what this is about. It's about MAGAts fearing they're gonna get their asses kicked in November fair and square with zero fraud.
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting on those 20M illegals voting I kept hearing about all these years.
You all know what this is about. It's about MAGAts fearing they're gonna get their asses kicked in November fair and square with zero fraud.
Meanwhile, I'm still waiting on those 20M illegals voting I kept hearing about all these years.
This is about ensuring that current law limiting voting in federal elections to US citizens is upheld,.. As the actions of many states would seem to indicate that they don't take this requirement seriously.
Last edited:
He’s just passing along bullsh.it propaganda Trump sold him.
Yep - if you’re not familiar with @TigerGrowls by now you’ll know he’s a senile, but well meaning, old man. Just ignore him - he can’t engage in any intelligent conversation.
Latest
-
01
Tiger Illustrated Football
Inside the contrast in public messaging from Dabo Swinney and Chad Morris
-
02
Tiger Illustrated Football
Thursday Clemson Football Insider: Tait Reynolds, O-line issues, the portal, Belichick, scheduling & much more
-
03
Tiger Illustrated Football Recruiting
Thursday Clemson Football Recruiting Nuggets
-
04
On3 Football
UNC defensive coordinator Steve Belichick resigns
-
05
Tiger Illustrated Football
A major challenge awaits Clemson's defensive front