I bet encouraging heavy tobacco use could combat the Jaxon epidemicOriginally posted by GonzoCat90:
Ironically enough, not vaccinating seems to be the only way to combat the Xander epidemic.
I'll guess what you hate more is how much the truth hurts.Originally posted by TankedCat:
and I hate condescending asses on the internetOriginally posted by jamo0001:
Because (1) lots of kids are being exposed before they're old enough to get vaccinated, and (2) even the best vaccines are only 80-90% effective. That's why we vaccinate EVERYONE despite most never getting exposedOriginally posted by TankedCat:
At the risk of having someone tell me how backwards I am, I am not anti-vaccine. I've had my children vaccinated, but I am against multiple vaccinations at the same time.
My doctor was continually pissed at me because I did not want my children to get a cocktail of vaccinations as the same time.
In some cases we didn't have a choice, in a couple I think we did - although its been many years so I'm not clear on how it played out.
If that was foolish - so be it. As a parent I was doing what I thought was best for my children.
What concerns me now is I don't understand if such a small number of children have not been vaccinated, then how can there be so many cases of measles showing up now? What are the odds of a small number of children not vaccinated being randomly grouped together in an outbreak?
The fact that you don't even know those simple answers is perfect evidence that you are in no position to be questioning the medicine involved.
I touching hate the Google/WebMD generation that thinks they can make sense of incredibly complex fields of study and then go against the experts
(I know you're joking) and just going to throw this out there. Maybe diagnosis criteria has changed.Originally posted by Joey Rupption:
I think autism is caused by SSRI's in the water supply. JMO
and what is the truth?Originally posted by fuzz77:
I'll guess what you hate more is how much the truth hurts.Originally posted by TankedCat:
and I hate condescending asses on the internetOriginally posted by jamo0001:
Because (1) lots of kids are being exposed before they're old enough to get vaccinated, and (2) even the best vaccines are only 80-90% effective. That's why we vaccinate EVERYONE despite most never getting exposedOriginally posted by TankedCat:
At the risk of having someone tell me how backwards I am, I am not anti-vaccine. I've had my children vaccinated, but I am against multiple vaccinations at the same time.
My doctor was continually pissed at me because I did not want my children to get a cocktail of vaccinations as the same time.
In some cases we didn't have a choice, in a couple I think we did - although its been many years so I'm not clear on how it played out.
If that was foolish - so be it. As a parent I was doing what I thought was best for my children.
What concerns me now is I don't understand if such a small number of children have not been vaccinated, then how can there be so many cases of measles showing up now? What are the odds of a small number of children not vaccinated being randomly grouped together in an outbreak?
The fact that you don't even know those simple answers is perfect evidence that you are in no position to be questioning the medicine involved.
I touching hate the Google/WebMD generation that thinks they can make sense of incredibly complex fields of study and then go against the experts
This is exactly the point that I don't feel Bill is wanting to acknowledge. Freedom of choice is not an unfettered right.Originally posted by drxman1:
Freedom of choice is an interesting topic. When you're 18 you get to make those choices for yourself. Until then, your parents have the final say...unless of course their beliefs are detrimental to the child's welfare. At which point, the government can step in and do what is considered in the best interest of the child.
Ah, so the Internet causes Autism.Originally posted by buckmaster022:
(I know you're joking) and just going to throw this out there. Maybe diagnosis criteria has changed.Originally posted by Joey Rupption:
I think autism is caused by SSRI's in the water supply. JMO
![]()
You are wrong. I am much smarter than a lot of people and definitely smarter than you.Originally posted by Bill Derington:
Joey, I'm sure you're very proud of yourself, using all those big words and all. Get off your high horse man, this is a message board, you're not smarter than anyone else, even though you think you are. You're just a douchebag with a complex, it's ok, you're not fooling anyone either .
My point was and is, do we need the government telling us how to raise our children, and where do we draw the line? I joined this discussion to just bounce around ideas. I didn't realize I was going to get the wraith of Joey Erruption, or sway anyones opinion, wasn't my intention.
The point on the flu vaccine was supposed to be a ridiculous statement, but apparently it flew right over your head.
Look, You don't have to agree with me, thats fine, but you completely overreacted. All I said was a parent should be able to choose, not that I think children shouldn't be vaccinated. Lighten up brother, it's all good.
Cindy is kinky so she fornicates often.Originally posted by Joey Rupption:
I have a hankering to explain the Krebs Cycle if you're interested.
Pics of Cindy please. TIA.Originally posted by drxman1:
Cindy is kinky so she fornicates often.Originally posted by Joey Rupption:
I have a hankering to explain the Krebs Cycle if you're interested.
Was hoping someone would miss the malate.Originally posted by Beavis606:
I'll let Joey be the judge, but I think you left out M, doc.
Nice reaction, Doc.Originally posted by drxman1:
Was hoping someone would miss the malate.Originally posted by Beavis606:
I'll let Joey be the judge, but I think you left out M, doc.
![]()
jamo, you are correct that the right move is to vaccinate your children (i certainly will, when i have kids) but people should not be forced to do so. freedom of choice is a distinct issue from the rational course of action for the population's well being.Originally posted by jamo0001:
No, we do have to force people on this issue. And I'm serious. 40% of Americans can't even pass the goddamn citizenship test.
I've been to PTA meetings. Those wenches are not competent to make these types of decisions.
It's a good one to get. If you step on a rusty nail within 5 years of getting it, you don't need anything.. if you don't, you'll need a a booster and immune globulin.Originally posted by ymmot31:
I received a message on My Chart last week that said I was overdue for a vaccine. It was for a Tdap vaccine due since May of 1971. I was in the fifth grade then and remember getting several vaccines at that grade school over the years.
I did a little research and found I should get this if I'm going to be around infants 1 year or younger. Gonna use that get out of jail free card whenever the opportunity arises, even though I'll get the vaccine if my doctor suggests it.
1. The anti-vaccine crowd has historically been on the left. It was a common rejoinder to the "Repubs hate science" chants. This whole freedom/small govt thing is a recent development."[Anti-vaccine enthusiasts] tend to be people ... who shop at Whole Foods and believe in the health benefits of organics and natural stuff," he said. "This notion appeals to them because they think the idea of injecting something foreign into a child must bad. It's not true, it's just based on this touchy-feely notion that natural is better."
Much of the anti-vaccination movement is associated with the Hollywood left. Oprah Winfrey, for instance, has been criticized for giving a platform to actress Jenny McCarthy, who is among the most high-profile of the activists promoting the vaccine-autism link.
Then-candidate Obama in 2008 said he was "suspicious" about a possible link between vaccinations and autism.
And Hillary Clinton, the Democratic front-runner for president in 2016 if she mounts a bid, told an anti-vaccine group during her 2008 campaign, "I am committed to make investments to find the causes of autism, including possible environmental causes like vaccines."
I'm not sure how much more effort can be put into educating people when Jenny touchin' McCarthy is enough to sway them.Originally posted by Bill Derington:
As Joey so eloquently told me, 92% of children are vaccinated for measles. It should be higher, but forcing people isn't the answer in my mind. Educating people on the benefits would be a better way.
Originally posted by Bill Derington:
Ymmot, so what are you proposing, that it should be against the law not to vaccinate? What else can we outlaw that poses a threat to society, why stop here.
it is a freedom issue. no one else but me should be deciding what happens to my children. i'm all for vaccination, but the united states isn't a socialist dictatorship either. parents should be *encouraged* to vaccinate their kids, not forced.Originally posted by GonzoCat90:
Originally posted by Bill Derington:
Ymmot, so what are you proposing, that it should be against the law not to vaccinate? What else can we outlaw that poses a threat to society, why stop here.
But we already do this, and vaccination carries much larger ramifications than some of the things we have laws against already. It's why you can't drive as fast as you want. It's why you can't have a grenade launcher. Not only do you not have the right to decide that your child be at risk of deadly disease, but you don't have the right to then let that kid loose on the rest of society.
I don't understand why this is even a "freedom" issue. We shouldn't have to make these freaks vaccinate their children, but if they won't do it without being "forced" then I guess we have to.
too bad.Originally posted by d2atTech:
it is a freedom issue. no one else but me should be deciding what happens to my children.
Originally posted by Bill Derington:
Gonzo, What should we do if a parent chooses not to vaccinate their child? Arrest them, take away the kids? Are the kids an imminent threat to society? Exactly how far are we willing to take it?
.Plenty of schools already ban peanuts because of the risk to kids with allergies. Kids who haven't been vaccinated against potentially deadly diseases can certainly be barred from attending a school where they could possibly put other kids at risk.