Veazey's Dan Mullen Article
- Thread starter Maroon Eagle
- Start date
- Status
I was wondering the same thing when I read the article. On everything that I have read about Mullen, I have never seen mention of him having a child. I actually thought that I had read that the child on the way was going to be his first.
Who cares? It has zero to do with his ability to coach a football game.
Who cares? It has zero to do with his ability to coach a football game.
O
Ole Miss Grad
Guest
Not a big deal. However, it's interesting the 'relationship' was apparently after his relationship with his wife started.
O
Ole Miss Grad
Guest
it's just kind of ridiculous that EVERY post you make on here has to try to take some kind of shot at state...and don't try to act like you didn't mean anything by it. it just gets old.
How do you know that? Mullen's son would have been born in 2003 since he's 5, meaning he was probably conceived in 2002 or early 2003. Mullen didn't marry his wife until 2005, so you're probably wrong unless Mullen and his wife waited a long time to get married.Ole Miss Grad said:
Nice of you to try to take a shot at our coach though.
we're the one's with issues...but hey, his prediction on a state university getting audited in the near future were right as proven last week by the clarion ledger article on OM being audited
ill do the math for you. the article says he met his wife while he was at Bowling Green. he was at Bowling Green in 2001-2002. the kid is 5, so he was born in '03.QuaoarsKing said:
'03 is after the 2001-2002 season that he met and started dating his wife.
now, i have absolutely no idea if the relationship with his wife started and when he was at BG and continued without pause all the way until he was married, or what the situation was. personally, i dont really care all that much. he is a coach, and if he doesnt totally suck as a coach, ill be happy.
but with that said, the timeline is...curious. unimportant and trival for sure, but still curious.
not possible that the kid was conceived in '02? is it not also possible that dan met his wife in '02? is it not possible that the kids mother and dan knew each other in '02 before he knew his wife? you said that the article said he "met" his wife in '02. that doesn't mean that they were in a relationship in '02, nescessarily? jesus christ i can't believe i'm arguing over this. it's a non-issue and omgrad's just trying to stir **** up. i'm and idiot.
well if the kid is still 5, then no it isnt possible. of course, KV's reporting could be wrong and the kid could be older than 5. but if he is still 5, even as in 5yo and just 1 day from being 6, then even at that, he was still conceived in '03. do the math. even if he was conceived in an all out bash on Dec 31st of 2002, he would be 6 right now.
i too cant believe im arguing over this. mostly because i dont give a **** about it. clearly(per the article), he has a relationship with his son and is as involved as he feels he can be in the kids life...that is better than many of the dads of the kids he recruits, its cool by me.
but damn, just because the OM shed stirs **** up doesnt mean there isnt any possible truth to the matter.
the article says that he met his wife and went after her while he was at BGSU. the next year he headed out to the land of the Latter Days, so it is very reasonable to assume the relationship actually started when they met(or quite shortly after), since she was in Ohio.
but yes, it is possible that there is a reasonable answer to this that allows Mullen to still be the perceived saint. the info given clearly isnt detailed enough for us to know one way or the other. so since there isnt enough info, OM shed's view is quite possible. and the math supports his **** stirring opinion.
i too cant believe im arguing over this. mostly because i dont give a **** about it. clearly(per the article), he has a relationship with his son and is as involved as he feels he can be in the kids life...that is better than many of the dads of the kids he recruits, its cool by me.
but damn, just because the OM shed stirs **** up doesnt mean there isnt any possible truth to the matter.
the article says that he met his wife and went after her while he was at BGSU. the next year he headed out to the land of the Latter Days, so it is very reasonable to assume the relationship actually started when they met(or quite shortly after), since she was in Ohio.
but yes, it is possible that there is a reasonable answer to this that allows Mullen to still be the perceived saint. the info given clearly isnt detailed enough for us to know one way or the other. so since there isnt enough info, OM shed's view is quite possible. and the math supports his **** stirring opinion.
Ole Miss Grad said:
If he takes care of this child and does his part as the father, then whenever it was conceived is irrelevant in my book. If it is still interesting to you then you need to go out and buy another National Enquirer, make sure your coach attends his anger management classes and stfu.
V
VanillaFace
Guest
KurtRambis4 said:
Considering the fact that you flame and troll every Ole Miss poster that posts here, I don't think you have much room to talk. You're the longer-winded cb9.
when people act like idiots i call them out on it. regardless of if they're a state fan or om. just ask ronny.
*edited to add: this is a state board, too. what these people like omgrad are doing would be like me going to nafoom every day talking ****. i don't do it. why? bc it's dumb and a waste of time.
*edited to add: this is a state board, too. what these people like omgrad are doing would be like me going to nafoom every day talking ****. i don't do it. why? bc it's dumb and a waste of time.
....according you you, "met his wife at Bowling Green" is the same thing as "started dating his wife."
I met my wife two years before I started dating her, and I know a lot of other folks who have similar stories. If he and his wife are happy together, it doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks about it.
In other words, knock off the ********.
I met my wife two years before I started dating her, and I know a lot of other folks who have similar stories. If he and his wife are happy together, it doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks about it.
In other words, knock off the ********.
you are right, it doesnt matter what i think...nor do i have any thought that it would or should matter what i think.Frances Drebin said:
i didnt start the dumbass discussion, that OM guy did. and i didnt dismiss his comment, others did. all ive done is say that his comment is plausible. if you do a timeline, it is possible. i have no idea if it did or did not happen the way the OM poster suggests, just like i have no idea id it did or did not happen the way others have suggested.
it is speculation because there isnt enough information. but just because there isnt enough info doesnt mean the OM guy's comment is incorrect. people dismissed his comment based on basic math, and they F'd it up. all i did was show that there is a way for the OM guy's comment to be correct, in terms of a timeline.
yep, just like you and your wife, it is possible that he met his wife in Ohio then bolted out to Utah where they started dating via extreme long distance. of course, there is the little thing of the fact that she went out to Utah at the same time that Mullen did and was an anchor/reporter in Salt Lake.
id say that her going out to Utah when Mullen was out in Utah is either coincidence of epic proportions, or they were together and she followed him out there. and in my book, packing up and leaving Ohio to go to Utah with a guy kinda means there is already a foundation for a relationship and that they are involved at the time.
call me crazy.
knock off the ********, the OM poster may be a tool who tries to make MSU look bad every chance he gets, but his statement is possible with the timeline, so just blindly dismissing it because of who he is is Fn sad.
one of the most basic tenets of debate is to attack the message, not the messenger. so do some damn reading and show that his comment isnt possible. otherwise, let the comment stand as being just as possible as Mullen's situation being the same as you and your wife.
damn, why is this tough to understand?
mstateglfr said:
hey, who says we can't all agree on something. i think everyone is pissed not because that they think what he's saying is completely false, but rather that it's the most negative way you can look at this information and that this clown is always pointing out the most negative possible aspect of any msu story.
** moderators please lock this thread, it is useless.
he makes one little comment and this thread erupts into an in-depth discussion of the conception of Mullen's kid..... Ghey!
congrats Ole Miss Grad... and %*%@ you!
Edit: I thought rule 17 was only enforced on the subject line? what the @*!! ?
congrats Ole Miss Grad... and %*%@ you!
Edit: I thought rule 17 was only enforced on the subject line? what the @*!! ?
mstateglfr said:
Mstateflfr is correct. Don't ignore the facts; it just is not relevant to being a coach. There are fans,especially in the bible belt, that insist THEIR coach be not only a church goer but a saint as well. Usually you see this kind of crap on Gene's board or for Ole Miss on Yancey's board. I would not care if a winning coach was a wiccan. The important word is winning.
Pretending the facts are othewise or talking about meeting a wife but not dating is all part of the mindset that the coach has to be "good." He needs to be a good coach; not anything else.
If we were going to get all self-righteous about this ****, maybe we should've pull this nugget out along about, oh, say, after the Maine game.
A child conceived on December 31, 2002 would be usually be born sometime around August-September 2003 thus being five years old. Now if it occurred before April 1, 2002, you could be right.mstateglfr said:
(getting the hook out of my mouth...)
V
VanillaFace
Guest
Shouldn't you be called out as well?
The difference in what you and many here do and what NAFOOM does when there is a "rival" poster on the board is that so many of you act like damn sheep and act as if there is no way the OM poster could be correct. Conversely, if DS or Faust or Mutt or someone like that brought information similar to NAFOOM, we don't act like fools.
The difference in what you and many here do and what NAFOOM does when there is a "rival" poster on the board is that so many of you act like damn sheep and act as if there is no way the OM poster could be correct. Conversely, if DS or Faust or Mutt or someone like that brought information similar to NAFOOM, we don't act like fools.
by all means. when i go over to nafoom to stir **** up and act like an idiot by making up lies call me out on it. go ahead.
O
Ole Miss Grad
Guest
Thank you.
As I said, it is no big deal.
As I said, it was 'interesting'.
Damn, some of these yahoo's just want to smack on an Ole Miss poster no matter what is said.
That's sad (Rodney King reference here).
If I wanted to smack, I could think of many things other than the timeline on when his kid was born.
I'd probably start out with two dimes and a quarter, but I won't even get into that.
As for the Kennedy references, they are going to have to come up with something else. I've said many times, that doesn't bother me at all. If I didn't read the newspaper, I wouldn't even know when we play a basketball game.
As I said, it is no big deal.
As I said, it was 'interesting'.
Damn, some of these yahoo's just want to smack on an Ole Miss poster no matter what is said.
That's sad (Rodney King reference here).
If I wanted to smack, I could think of many things other than the timeline on when his kid was born.
I'd probably start out with two dimes and a quarter, but I won't even get into that.
As for the Kennedy references, they are going to have to come up with something else. I've said many times, that doesn't bother me at all. If I didn't read the newspaper, I wouldn't even know when we play a basketball game.
- Status