Wachtel: Wisconsin no longer Q1, Rutgers has work to do to get in

  • Thread starter anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy
  • Start date

RUfromNJ

All-Conference
Oct 23, 2007
4,449
3,141
0
Angry Season 2 GIF by The Office
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
Actually if says if we lose our. I assume Sunday still does it
On geo and austin’s pod they went over this scenario. He said if we lost to minny, in order to have any confidence going into selection sunday wed want to beat minny and win one game in the b1g tourney. If not wed be in a tough spot
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766

BigEastPhil

Heisman
Nov 25, 2007
18,635
12,626
66
It always comes to down to last game of the year for us. It’s impeccable !

Team needs to regroup and best Northwestern on Sunday !

To torture us more , I have a feeling our game vs NW will go OT.

I also need to regroup mentally and emotionally. 😂
 

MiloTalon13

All-American
Jun 3, 2022
3,979
5,608
0
It would be interesting to recalibrate to make the value of wins and losses static - e.g. if you beat a team when they were Q1 it counts as Q1 no matter what they do after that and see if this is more or less predictive of NCAA tournament success than the existing net with dynamic win/loss values.
 
Dec 5, 2022
1,346
1,664
0
On geo and austin’s pod they went over this scenario. He said if we lost to minny, in order to have any confidence going into selection sunday wed want to beat minny and win one game in the b1g tourney. If not wed be in a tough spot
That not what he said. I think you might have an actually learning disability kid.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,897
0
It would be interesting to recalibrate to make the value of wins and losses static - e.g. if you beat a team when they were Q1 it counts as Q1 no matter what they do after that and see if this is more or less predictive of NCAA tournament success than the existing net with dynamic win/loss values.
You've mentioned this before.. but it's not really possible to do it because the ratings in the beginning of the season would be based off of like three games and be completely nonsensical.

Even after 10 games or so there's so much noise.
 

RutgersClassof2004

All-Conference
Feb 23, 2020
3,059
2,797
113
Maybe I shouldn't, but I have faith that the committee is smart enough to understand that a win at #74 and a win at #76 are not very different even if they straddle different sides of an arbitrary border.
No somehow we went from likely in with 3 losses to close season to now out with 1 loss. Why, because Wisconsin lost to Purdue? Sure makes sense.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: fluoxetine

WPUknight

Senior
Oct 23, 2008
1,543
685
0
On geo and austin’s pod they went over this scenario. He said if we lost to minny, in order to have any confidence going into selection sunday wed want to beat minny and win one game in the b1g tourney. If not wed be in a tough spot
The bubble is so weak this year. Even updated brackets this morning have us as a 9/10 seed. Just win Sunday and we're in.
 

RW90

All-American
Feb 2, 2002
8,322
7,546
113
I'll gladly defer to the number crunchers here, but my simplistic view is we now need two wins. I realize the committee considers the entire season record, but our play down the stretch (4-6 last ten if we split) would look putrid and appear as an awful red flag.
 
Oct 30, 2011
304
350
32
If we beat northwestern and lose to Illinois/MSU/NW/etc in b10 tourney then who will really jump us on the bubble? I still think we’re ahead of Michigan Wisconsin psu at that point alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goru7 and Scangg
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest
If we beat northwestern and lose to Illinois/MSU/NW/etc in b10 tourney then who will really jump us on the bubble? I still think we’re ahead of Michigan Wisconsin psu at that point alone.
I think if we win one more were in. The issue brad brings up is no other at large team has as many q3/q4 losses as us and our record vs q1/q2 is at the bottom of the barrel as well
 
Oct 30, 2011
304
350
32
I think if we win one more were in. The issue brad brings up is no other at large team has as many q3/q4 losses as us and our record vs q1/q2 is at the bottom of the barrel as well
Yeah but we had 4 q4 losses last year and made it. Maybe in different years we would miss out but this year seems like there aren’t many great at larges to steal bids. Of course if there are some surprise tourney champs in ACC, big East, pac12, WCC, etc then I guess things could get dicey
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,278
168,014
113
Maybe I shouldn't, but I have faith that the committee is smart enough to understand that a win at #74 and a win at #76 are not very different even if they straddle different sides of an arbitrary border.


have faith...and losing to #85 isnt the same as losing to #238
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregkoko

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
16,929
14,369
113
I dont know but a 13-7 Nebraska didnt make it
13-5 in 2017-18... very top-heavy year in the B1G. Only four B1G teams made it to the Big Dance that season. Michigan advanced to the NCAA title game, losing to Villanova.
 
Last edited by a moderator: