shauntclair,
I think you somewhat misunderstood my point. I agree with you that often a special player or two can make a huge difference in 1A. My argument is that your reasoning applies to basically all sports at any level.
However, a superstar (yes, even in 1A) does not guarantee success as the G Master Blaster suggested. Parry McCluer's R. Dawson was one of the best Group A players I've seen. PM was a football power but he could not get them to the promised land.
Comparing different levels of sports does indeed make logical sense. Let's take a brief look at Alabama and Ohio State, two of college football's elite programs. Even among teams made up of all super star high school players (as all top college teams consist of), they almost always have to have a really special player or two to reach the top.
To illustrate my thought, I would say that RBs Derrick Henry (Alabama) and Ezekiel Elliott (Ohio State) were "men among boys" even at that elite level.
Lastly, you and some others like to say (sometimes it sounds like a put down) that most 1A teams would get squashed like a bug on a windshield by most 4A to 6A schools.
Well, guess what? The Richmond Flying Squirrels are not as good as the New York Yankees.
You mean the Richmond Kickers are not as good as Major League Soccer teams, which are not as good as the English Premier League teams? I used to love watching the Richmond Renegades, a minor league hockey team. You mean the Renegades were not as good as the Washington Capitals? What? Higher level teams are overall stronger programs with more talent and resources?
Well, no s--t.