in schedule strength.
Wow. So the bar is THAT low? 3-9 (0-8) and he gets year three?Really 1 and 3 would justify him staying as long as we get 3 wins. Then it's 6 wins or bust in 2026.
I was in the camp it's hard to fire a coach after 2 seasons when you would be going on your 5th coach in 7 years. It sucks. Plus I don't think Selmon will fire his buddy after 2 seasons anyway.Wow. So the bar is THAT low? 3-9 (0-8) and he gets year three?
Jesus.
Nobody wants a bar that low, but the fact is if there is large improvement from last year they will give him year 3. We just flipped the roster over as well so they are trying to improve our talent.Wow. So the bar is THAT low? 3-9 (0-8) and he gets year three?
Jesus.
Still cleaning up the mess he was leftWhat lebby fluffer justifications am I leaving out?
I edited to add these two fluffer excuses. Will try to keep a running fluffer excuse tally.Still cleaning up the mess he was left
All the money went to baseball
Wait, what? Last year just didn’t happen now? Lebby’s not the first coach to step into a difficult situation. But he compounded it with poor portal evaluations & recruiting and very questionable staff hires. And high school recruiting has fallen off a cliff.This is year #1 for Lebby whether folks like it or not. He didn't even have enough players to run a scout team last season and the talent was some of the worst we've ever had minus a handful of players. He messed up bringing back the terrible defensive staff.
Let me add - the decision to keep Hutzler makes a year 2 firing more warranted from a fan point of view.I was in the camp it's hard to fire a coach after 2 seasons when you would be going on your 5th coach in 7 years. It sucks. Plus I don't think Selmon will fire his buddy after 2 seasons anyway.
Name all the schools that didn't have enough players to even field a scout team.....he got left a monumental poop show talent wise and NIL wise. NIL got handled and talent should be improved, but the schedule is a killer. Time to see what he can do...Wait, what? Last year just didn’t happen now? Lebby’s not the first coach to step into a difficult situation. But he compounded it with poor portal evaluations & recruiting and very questionable staff hires. And high school recruiting has fallen off a cliff.
And this years roster may very well have fewer 4* players than last year did. And next year we have one 4* commit so far.Name all the schools that didn't have enough players to even field a scout team.....he got left a monumental poop show talent wise and NIL wise. NIL got handled and talent should be improved, but the schedule is a killer. Time to see what he can do...
I edited to add these two fluffer excuses. Will try to keep a running fluffer excuse tally.
Name all the schools that didn't have enough players to even field a scout team.....he got left a monumental poop show talent wise and NIL wise. NIL got handled and talent should be improved, but the schedule is a killer. Time to see what he can do...
Welcome to our reality. Please don't take it out on your liver over the holiday weekend.Wow. So the bar is THAT low? 3-9 (0-8) and he gets year three?
Jesus.
#ShowtimeWait, what? Last year just didn’t happen now? Lebby’s not the first coach to step into a difficult situation. But he compounded it with poor portal evaluations & recruiting and very questionable staff hires. And high school recruiting has fallen off a cliff.
A program without a history of excellence/competing nationally that churns 5 coaches in 7 years will hurt itself more in the long run. I think you have to give 3 years just to give the next guy some hope that if he can coach, we will give him time to prove it. Short of us having to kick rocks, I think he gets year 3.I was in the camp it's hard to fire a coach after 2 seasons when you would be going on your 5th coach in 7 years. It sucks. Plus I don't think Selmon will fire his buddy after 2 seasons anyway.
That same **** was being spouted off when we fired sloppy Joe. And we made a great hire. It’s a sec job that can pay well for the right guy. These coaches aren’t worried about you firing a guy who’s been as big as a disaster as Lebby. That’s been proven time and time again. That does not guarantee you will make the right hire next time but we could fire Lebby immediately after the egg bowl and the pool of candidates wouldn’t change any at all.We could fire Lebby but I'm not sure who would want to be our HC right now. Between the current state of the SEC and college football in general we've just been dealt a really bad hand.
Situation as it is… we are probably still in that position now.I was in the camp it's hard to fire a coach after 2 seasons when you would be going on your 5th coach in 7 years. It sucks. Plus I don't think Selmon will fire his buddy after 2 seasons anyway.
The problem isn't churning coaches. The problem is hiring bad coaches.A program without a history of excellence/competing nationally that churns 5 coaches in 7 years will hurt itself more in the long run. I think you have to give 3 years just to give the next guy some hope that if he can coach, we will give him time to prove it. Short of us having to kick rocks, I think he gets year 3.
Agreed. But outside perception would just be "who do they think they are?" not giving any coach a fighting chance to get his program built, even though the college landscape has changed so dramatically that you basically have to rebuild the roster annually. I can see there being a longevity benefit in that whoever remains in the program year to year would need less coaching on system basics and might help quickly assimilate the new guys who come in from the portal.The problem isn't churning coaches. The problem is hiring bad coaches.
The outside perception will be that no one cares. Really. They don't. Media might get outraged for a minute then they'll move on. And any prospective coaches would only care that a good paying SEC job is open. They would understand that in this business you get fired if you don't win. It's that simple.Agreed. But outside perception would just be "who do they think they are?" not giving any coach a fighting chance to get his program built, even though the college landscape has changed so dramatically that you basically have to rebuild the roster annually. I can see there being a longevity benefit in that whoever remains in the program year to year would need less coaching on system basics and might help quickly assimilate the new guys who come in from the portal.
The reality is like it or not the college football world has been turned upside down since then.That same **** was being spouted off when we fired sloppy Joe. And we made a great hire. It’s a sec job that can pay well for the right guy. These coaches aren’t worried about you firing a guy who’s been as big as a disaster as Lebby. That’s been proven time and time again. That does not guarantee you will make the right hire next time but we could fire Lebby immediately after the egg bowl and the pool of candidates wouldn’t change any at all.
Perhaps. I could also see a coach looking at the history of coaches that "moved up" to coaching SEC ball at MSU and saw their career never recover. Moorehead and Arnett certainly haven't fared well to date. From my seat it just looks like people who took a job they couldn't handle, but I have no idea if MSU has some notoriety in coaching circles for not providing proper support, adequate resources, enough time, etc. I'm curious about that. I doubt that any coach is sitting around thinking about MSU, in general.The outside perception will be that no one cares. Really. They don't. Media might get outraged for a minute then they'll move on. And any prospective coaches would only care that a good paying SEC job is open. They would understand that in this business you get fired if you don't win. It's that simple.
That's always going to be the case no matter how many years we wait to fire a bad coach. Mississippi State isn't an easy place to win big. But Sherrill, Mullen and Leach proved you can win here. And if you're a younger coach looking to move up, Mullen proved you can move up to an elite job. Any prospective coaches will look at it the same as you or I would. Moorhead, Arnett and Lebby were idiots who were in over their heads.Perhaps. I could also see a coach looking at the history of coaches that "moved up" to coaching SEC ball at MSU and saw their career never recover. Moorehead and Arnett certainly haven't fared well to date. From my seat it just looks like people who took a job they couldn't handle, but I have no idea if MSU has some notoriety in coaching circles for not providing proper support, adequate resources, enough time, etc. I'm curious about that. I doubt that any coach is sitting around thinking about MSU, in general.