We need a new rule on the pack

[GhostOfJackie]

Not to question the general's absolute authority on this board, but we need to do something about an issue that makes me want to pull my hair out after every basketball game.

Rule Suggestion: You must have over 30 posts to ***** about Stansbury, our players, or our basketball program.

I'm sick of all these ***-clowns coming on here (you know, the 8 posts in 8 years type people) and giving their opinion of Stans when they never give their opinion on any other issue. Most of it is not giving an opinion and mostly bitching like a little girl. It's also clear that most of them have no clue what they are talking about and don't realize that we are sick of hearing about it. It's annoying and we should not allow it. Once you get to talking about other issues you earn your right to ***** about Stans and our players.

As always, if you don't agree with me you are dead wrong.

 

[AlCoDog]

That would be a pretty tough rule to enforce considering th ehundreds that fall into that category. Would you rather those people ruin other threads trying to establish a post count.

And what is that in your avatar picture, a stadium for ants?

/zoolander</p>

 

[GhostOfJackie]

It's LT reviewing over his genius idea of putting stadium seating in space before bowling in the stadium. With the KANG

 

[topdawg.sixpack]

There are a few new guys bitching, but I would say a majority of the new guys are Stans defenders who heard word of the constant bashing he takes on this board, so they came to his defense.

 

[Buford T. Justice]

Rule Suggestion: You must have over 30 posts to ***** about Stansbury, our players, or our basketball program.

Because it is so clear that one's intelligence is directly proportional to their post count (sarcasm)

 

[Bdog9090]

I would say it's pretty evenly split between people that support Stans for reasons you've stated and people that caught on to the fact that it has become pretty trendy to bash Stans and want him gone.

 

[GhostOfJackie]

Wow, I guess it is. Its my opinion that there are more people who come over here to ***** then people who come over here to take up for Stans.

 

[goldeneye]

How many posts do we need before we can start giving Stansbury advice in our sig pic?

 

[Hanmudog]

Can we just straight up ban any MSUposter that refers to Stansbury as "your coach" and our team as "your team" in a thread while trying to somehow distance themselves from losing? That **** makes me sick.

 

[RocketCityDawg]

Or more chillin'.

Like not giving a Rule #17.

Not being intense enough to pull hair.
Those days are behind me, as Backer, Michael, IBMDand HD6 can attest.

Signed, mini-Me.
-----------
I will acknowledge that there hasn't been universal enforcement of the rules, but the 6-pack is always right.

For one thing, our current football coach uses the term, "$!#$."Rule # 18.But, he's not a poster so far as we know.
That kind of stretches the paradigm if someone quotes him, perhaps, but the 6-pack is always right.</p>