Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote=".Bodhi." data-source="post: 131195556" data-attributes="member: 1683017">My criticism all along has been Huggins's refusal to change.&nbsp; I've never called for him to be fired but I've also been steadfast in believing that WVU basketball is more than him or any individual.&nbsp; There is something very off-putting in the impression I get from some posters, and even Huggins to an extent, that we, as a fanbase, should be in a constant state of astonishment that he would grace us with the privilege of having him as our coach.&nbsp; The privilege should be mutual.&nbsp; After all, WVU was something before Huggins got here and will continue to be after he's done. Do I think he is a great basketball mind? Yes. Do I believe he will flip the philosophy that gave him success at Cinci to suit the players of today? Not really.&nbsp; I'm not confident that his ego would allow it and that's why I'm so frustrated with him.&nbsp; One, I definitely think that if he were to swallow his pride or reassess his approach or whatever you want to call it, that he would be very successful in run-and-gun, get up the floor, fire up 3s, average 85 and give 78 per game. And two, much more attributed to his sychophants, that you can't question anything about him without having your fanhood called into question.</blockquote>

[QUOTE=".Bodhi., post: 131195556, member: 1683017"] My criticism all along has been Huggins's refusal to change. I've never called for him to be fired but I've also been steadfast in believing that WVU basketball is more than him or any individual. There is something very off-putting in the impression I get from some posters, and even Huggins to an extent, that we, as a fanbase, should be in a constant state of astonishment that [I]he [/I]would grace us with the privilege of having him as our coach. The privilege should be mutual. After all, WVU was something before Huggins got here and will continue to be after he's done. Do I think he is a great basketball mind? Yes. Do I believe he will flip the philosophy that gave him success at Cinci to suit the players of today? Not really. I'm not confident that his ego would allow it and that's why I'm so frustrated with him. One, I definitely think that if he were to swallow his pride or reassess his approach or whatever you want to call it, that he would be very successful in run-and-gun, get up the floor, fire up 3s, average 85 and give 78 per game. And two, much more attributed to his sychophants, that you can't question anything about him without having your fanhood called into question. [/QUOTE]

Name