As the tourney is now, I just can't agree going very deep in it helps more than it hurts.<div>
</div><div>I think you have to consider your team, too. With our injuries, I just can't see justifying playing that long in it for no benefit. I realize we thought we might get a better draw from it and possibly host- I'm never mad at us for winning or wanting to compete. Never, not ever. Not mad at the coaching staff, either- I think they've done an excellent job with our guys and injuries, and they are the ones there every day seeing them. They will know more than I.</div><div>
</div><div>But when you consider OUR team THIS year, I think we have guys that would have benefitted more by not playing that far, either by getting out earlier or just taking a seat for some games. The fact that we had no byes adds to it. I'm just not comfortable with guys like Norris and Brownlee with chronic injuries playing that many games in a row for something that doesn't really matter- they need to be protected when possible. They've played a long time on their injuries.</div><div>
</div><div>Would we have done better in the first game with it? Nobody can know. It's just my preference with the way everything is set up now. Even with the 5 day break... 5 days isn't always enough for guys like that.</div><div>
</div><div>With that said, I thought we looked tired in the first game- mentally mostly, some (Norris, etc.) physically. Easily could have just been first game jitters, the layoff, etc. I do feel I was correct that Norris and Brownlee are probably worn down right now. Even if they weren't hurting (they are), compensating all season is hard on the body.</div><div>
</div><div>
</div>