Toggle sidebar

What a 32-team bracket might have looked like

QuaoarsKing

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,612
2,046
113
With 16 first round games, some are going to be great and some will be duds, but at least it's enough to have several great ones. There are a lot of blowouts in the first weekend of March Madness, but with that many games, several come down to the wire every year.

And fans who think that 64 is too many and it should just be 16 are welcome to start watching in the second weekend.
 
karlchilders.sixpack

karlchilders.sixpack

All-Conference
Jun 5, 2008
19,252
3,482
113
QuaoarsKing said:
With 16 first round games, some are going to be great and some will be duds, but at least it's enough to have several great ones. There are a lot of blowouts in the first weekend of March Madness, but with that many games, several come down to the wire every year.

And fans who think that 64 is too many and it should just be 16 are welcome to start watching in the second weekend.
Click to expand...
1764901569381.png
 
T

TTKADawg

Junior
Sep 20, 2024
634
370
63
QuaoarsKing said:
Based on the Big 10 proposal of a 28- or 32-team bracket with no conference championship games and at least 1 bid from every conference, so the first round would be this coming weekend. Rather than seeding strictly 1-32, I think they could have 4 each of 1 through 8 seeds in order to avoid rematches and spread the conferences around.

Personally, I think this would be a lot of fun. There would still be a few bubble teams upset (I considered Illinois and Iowa State), but nobody is going to feel bad about an 8-4 team getting left out.

Click to expand...
So …. We didn’t make it …
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom