What a despicable person Loretta Lynch is

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Look for the thread. Chances are I won't answer your question though, because, like I said, I don't make laws, you need to take it up with those that do. Abortion in this country is legal. Ohio just passed a 20 week law. You can bet your sweet *** it will be overturned. Kentucky is getting ready to do the same thing. It will be overturned too.

Normally I would agree with you but you may be wrong on this one. Trump is going to appoint Scalia's replacement. Trump has said he wants only originalists on the court. It is rumored that Kennedy will retire at the end of this upcoming term. If so, by the time these appeals get to the Supreme Court, there maybe five originalists on the court. Under those circumstances, I would not be so certain that those laws will be overturned.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,936
1,851
113
Look for the thread. Chances are I won't answer your question though, because, like I said, I don't make laws, you need to take it up with those that do. Abortion in this country is legal. Ohio just passed a 20 week law. You can bet your sweet *** it will be overturned. Kentucky is getting ready to do the same thing. It will be overturned too.
You can't be serious.

Here is the definition of fetus.

fetus
[fe´tus] (L.) the developing young in the uterus, specifically the unborn offspring in the postembryonic period, which in humans is from the third month after fertilization until birth

I'm not getting into an abortion debate, I would absolutely destroy you on that.

My response:
Destroy me? How, by arguing for infanticide?

So tell me, why is it considered "murder" if that Baby is deliberately killed even after only 8 weeks if it's alive outside the Womb....but it can be legally killed (Aborted) fully developed up to 20 minutes before it's removed from that same Womb in some States by an incision into the base of the skull and it's Brains are sucked out?(Partial Birth Abortion)

Go ahead, destroy me
.

This was your boast which you are of course refusing to own up to now, and this was my response that I've been waiting for you for over a month now to answer. You ducked out of the debate when challenged with that conundrum, just as you've left other debates when trapped by your own indefensible rhetoric.

So now that you have your own tongue to defend, you refuse to answer the question, defer, demur, try to change the topic, and then have the nerve to call me stupid.

You're a piece of work you know that countryroads89?
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,936
1,851
113
You probably think the earth is only a few thousand years old too.

Nope, but I'll bet you think it "evolved" from some Aurora nebula all by itself?

Destroy me? How, by arguing for infanticide?

So tell me, why is it considered "murder" if that Baby is deliberately killed even after only 8 weeks if it's alive outside the Womb....but it can be legally killed (Aborted) fully developed up to 20 minutes before it's removed from that same Womb in some States by an incision into the base of the skull and it's Brains are sucked out?(Partial Birth Abortion)

Go ahead, destroy me.

So in that case the Mother has no more obligation to keep that Baby alive than the Criminal killer?

So why is the Criminal killer prosecuted in this case for the death of the Baby and not just the Mother? If it's only a "Fetus" whose right to Life is not protected under the Constitution, why is the criminal who kills the Baby also prosecuted for that and not just killing the Mother?

The Fetus has no rights under the Constitution, correct?

you're trying the same thing with Sessions, and you don't even know what you're talking about. So let me ask you, has Sessions ever fought against the rights of Black people, or prosecuted them just because they were Black, or sponsored any legislation to keep Black people oppressed?

Or has he in fact done the exact opposite of all of those things on behalf of Black people

Which is it countryroads89?

You've refused to answer all of these as a matter of fact countryroads89. Proving either your own ignorance and stupidity, or abject cowardice.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
You've refused to answer all of these as a matter of fact countryroads89. Proving either your own ignorance and stupidity, or abject cowardice.

I gave you the definition of fetus.
You argued against global warming. You demonstrated your lack of knowledge of thermodynamics. Yes, I would say I have destroyed you. You even tried to play the victim race card today when I never did anything that was racist.

Destroyed! [laughing]
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,936
1,851
113
I gave you the definition of fetus.
You argued against global warming. You demonstrated your lack of knowledge of thermodynamics. Yes, I would say I have destroyed you. You even tried to play the victim race card today when I never did anything that was racist.

Destroyed! [laughing]

Tell you what countryroads89, while you prefer to pat yourself on your back over your perceived mellifluous deconstruction of my intellectual veracity, I'll simply remember your alacrity, unmitigated deftness, trenchancy, ineptitude and demonstrable illiteracy delineating your futility and abject inability attempting to defend yours.
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,936
1,851
113
I gave you the definition of fetus.

And in your definition you avoided the question. So by your own definition attempting to answer the question you proved how sadly misinformed you are.

The example I presented to you was a Baby only 8 weeks old. That's two months...but I forgot I'm stupid and you're smart right?

How many weeks are in a month countryroads89?

Educate me.