I mean, wasn't the athlete's dad at the heart of our investigation, too? Didn't we even make the case that it was Senior's doing and not Renardo's? And they end up punishing him for some 17'ing shoes and ****. Oh yeah, and not remembering something that had happened four years prior. That's a lot worse that pimping your son for 200G's. Let's punish the kid who did something wrong when he was fifteen years old. Not the kid who's 21 and has "no clue" what daddy's doing after he cheated in class and acquired stolen property.<div>
</div><div>******** THE NCAA.</div><div>
</div><div>Good for Kentucky. You can make Kanter a 17'ing Sally Struthers hungry kid commercial compared to Cam Newton if you spin it the right way.</div>