This question is borne out of another discussion, and I’ve seen it thrown around here a little bit lately,  and thought I’d start a new thread.
When someone says a coach is or isn’t a good fit, what exactly does that mean?
		
		
	 
Many times the people in charge of making the hiring decisions don’t know how to evaluate coaching candidates.  They don’t know football, they haven’t taken the time to evaluate what kind of program they want, and if they do know what they want it’s often very different from what the fans, players, and parents want from the program. 
I think this leads to a lot of “bad fits” and turnover at the head coach position. The experienced coaches do their research and can often recognize some warning signs to avoid a bad situation. 
I would say what classifies as a “good fit” is when the administration and the coach are both satisfied with the success of the program. This can mean 3-4 wins with a high GPA or it might mean competing for state titles. Either can be a good fit. 
The bad fits comes when the 3-4 win team is expected to compete for state titles by the administration or when the administration is unwilling or unable to provide the support that the head coach is seeking and the head coach gets to the point where they feel it is hurting the success of the program.