Easy to provide
A Turkish national and doctoral student at Tufts University has been detained by U.S. Department of Homeland Security agents without explanation, her lawyer said Wednesday.
apnews.com
We spoke to the former Columbia grad student’s friends and former coworkers.
www.teenvogue.com
Pro-Palestinian activist Momodou Taal’s suit against the federal government began in federal court on Tuesday.
www.cornellsun.com
Theres three, theres more. Please research yourself. They are attacking people for their thought because they know you will allow it because you consider them non citizens and not under the protection of the constitution. But you are wrong the constitution does not, in any way, give the rights just to citizens. Its purpose was to limit the government from tyranny against people in its lands. You are walking down a slippery slope friend.
I read the articles... and none of them support the idea that ICE “kidnapped students for their thoughts.” Each case involves students who were in the U.S. on visas and allegedly violated immigration laws (e.g. overstays, status issues, or failure to meet visa requirements). ICE acted based on immigration status, not political views.
No credible evidence shows they were arrested
because of what they wrote or believed. If they had been U.S. citizens taken for speech,
that would be a First Amendment violation. But they weren’t, and it wasn’t.
As for the Constitution... yes, some protections apply broadly to “persons,” but immigration law is a separate, civil framework that allows for removal of non-citizens who aren’t in compliance. That’s not a loophole, it’s longstanding constitutional law backed by precedent.
You’re trying to turn legal enforcement into a dystopian narrative. You can argue ICE is too aggressive, fine. But this isn’t about thoughtcrime... it’s about legal status. Let’s stay grounded in facts.