What is Cohen thinking?!

Status
Not open for further replies.

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
From Your Link.
..studies that have shown that lineup construction is, for the most part, immaterial. As long as you generally have your best hitters near the top of the order, the order doesn't matter.

Just another death knell to the argument.

Will James is smarter than the originator of sabermetrics/moneyball though**
 

Will James

Redshirt
Feb 11, 2013
1,342
0
0
Just another death knell to the argument.

Will James is smarter than the originator of sabermetrics/moneyball though**

do you know what "FOR THE MOST PART" means?

Do you not understand that the vast difference in power between Renfroe and Detz, is what makes me (and Cohen) undoubtedly correct in this
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
I feel sorry for you Mike Tolbert. It must suck never having had an original thought.

Hahaha nice try dubmass, I'm the one that has argued you from the get-go on this, they are just providing stats to back up that I'm right!

Watching you result to posts like this is great. My "original" thoughts have been proven 100% right in this thread, and it's eating you up. Thus, you blabbering Tolbert...yadayada...original thought...blahblah.

You were destroyed. Sorry "guy"
 
Last edited:

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
It's between Renfroe and Detz, not Rea... And since Detz has WAY higher OBP and WAY less power that's what makes me so so right with our lineup.

Right**

Let's just leave out the "power" guy that blows your entire argument to ****. This isn't even about him**
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
do you know what "FOR THE MOST PART" means?

Do you not understand that the vast difference in power between Renfroe and Detz, is what makes me (and Cohen) undoubtedly correct in this

Again -- ignoring Rea -- and using a lineup that he wasn't a part of as "evidence". Hilarious.
 

Will James

Redshirt
Feb 11, 2013
1,342
0
0
Hahaha nice try dubmass, I'm the one that has argued you from the get-go on this, they are just providing stats to back up that I'm right!

Watching you result to posts like this is great. My "original" thoughts have been proven 100% right in this thread, and it's eating you up. Thus, you blabbering Tolbert...yadayada...original thought...blahblah...

I was right, you of course were not.

If that makes you sleep well at night*

The board knows who is right on this. I was showing Shelton the numbers of AB's with men on base (which was my basis for hitting Renfroe 4th)

Bill literally says "What does this tell me? Your best hitters should bat in the number three and number four spots in the order. Put the speedier (and/or higher on-base) of the two in the number three slot." Because of Detz so far ahead in OBP and so far behind in power, it's patently obvious that Detz hits 3rd and Renfroe 4th.

Let's hear your lineup Cad. And please explain to us (with your own original thoughts) why you would bat a no power, walk machine in the 4 hole. I can't wait to laugh
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
If that makes you sleep well at night*

The board knows who is right on this. I was showing Shelton the numbers of AB's with men on base (which was my basis for hitting Renfroe 4th)

Bill literally says "What does this tell me? Your best hitters should bat in the number three and number four spots in the order. Put the speedier (and/or higher on-base) of the two in the number three slot." Because of Detz so far ahead in OBP and so far behind in power, it's patently obvious that Detz hits 3rd and Renfroe 4tg.

Let's hear your lineup Cad. And please explain to us (with your own original thoughts) why you would bat a no power, walk machine in the 4 hole. I can't wait to laugh

I posted it in the same thread as yours yesterday dipshit. If you weren't so obsessed with hearing yourself talk you would have seen mine.

And don't act like Rea wasn't discussed yesterday. You are conveniently leaving him out now to try and crawfish since you've been destroyed in this thread.

ETA: Yes, this board does indeed know who is right. Goat on the other hand...well...doesn't
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
If that makes you sleep well at night*

The board knows who is right on this. I was showing Shelton the numbers of AB's with men on base (which was my basis for hitting Renfroe 4th)

Bill literally says "What does this tell me? Your best hitters should bat in the number three and number four spots in the order. Put the speedier (and/or higher on-base) of the two in the number three slot." Because of Detz so far ahead in OBP and so far behind in power, it's patently obvious that Detz hits 3rd and Renfroe 4th.

Let's hear your lineup Cad. And please explain to us (with your own original thoughts) why you would bat a no power, walk machine in the 4 hole. I can't wait to laugh

By the way, the board also knows that this is how you always act in defeat. You start deflecting attention off of yourself and asking others their thoughts, etc..

Amazing how you never want to entertain thoughts of others until you're proven wrong,
 

Will James

Redshirt
Feb 11, 2013
1,342
0
0
I posted it in the same thread as yours yesterday dipshit. If you weren't so obsessed with hearing yourself talk you would have seen mine.

And don't act like Rea wasn't discussed yesterday. You are conveniently leaving him out now to try and crawfish since you've been destroyed in this thread.

Wait, you think Rea is better than Renfroe too?!

Leaving him out? Do you and Engie lack that much logic? He needs to hit 5th. Nobody's leaving him out. He is worthless in the Detz-Renfroe 3-4 debate because if you think we need to put either Detz or Renfroe behind Rea in the lineup then you are an idiot
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
Wait, you think Rea is better than Renfroe too?!

Leaving him out? Do you and Engie lack that much logic? He needs to hit 5th. Nobody's leaving him out. He is worthless in the Detz-Renfroe 3-4 debate because if you think we need to put either Detz or Renfroe behind Rea in the lineup then you are an idiot

Blahblahblahblah....where did I say Rea was "better" than Renfroe?

You are such a tool. You're so beaten that you're resulting to making **** up.
 

Will James

Redshirt
Feb 11, 2013
1,342
0
0
Blahblahblahblah....where did I say Rea was "better" than Renfroe?

You are such a tool. You're so beaten that you're resulting to making **** up.

You can't answer any question haha. No original thoughts from the cheerleader. Whats your lineup Cad?
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Bill literally says "What does this tell me? Your best hitters should bat in the number three and number four spots in the order.


[SIZE=+.5]Lineup Position[/SIZE][SIZE=+.5]Number of Times With Men on Base[/SIZE]
1259
2323
3351
4363
5333
6314
7304
8293
9288

<tbody>
</tbody>

Renfroe hit primarily in the 4-hole and 5-hole last year -- while Rea primarily hit in the 6-hole and 7-hole. Your statistics only makes Rea's late-order RBI dominance even more impressive.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Wait, you think Rea is better than Renfroe too?!

Leaving him out? Do you and Engie lack that much logic? He needs to hit 5th. Nobody's leaving him out. He is worthless in the Detz-Renfroe 3-4 debate because if you think we need to put either Detz or Renfroe behind Rea in the lineup then you are an idiot

So, you put BY FAR your best RBI producer in the 5-hole, where he gets significantly fewer chances to get those RBIs. You are arguing using sabermetrics -- link to the numbers -- and immediately go against those numbers to support an agenda...

You are owned. Give up. Or don't. This gets more and more hilarious as you go though...
 
Last edited:

Will James

Redshirt
Feb 11, 2013
1,342
0
0
[SIZE=+.5]Lineup Position[/SIZE][SIZE=+.5]Number of Times With Men on Base[/SIZE]
1259
2323
3351
4363
5333
6314
7304
8293
9288

<tbody>
</tbody>

Renfroe hit primarily in the 4-hole and 5-hole last year -- while Rea primarily hit in the 6-hole and 7-hole. Your statistics only makes Rea's late-order RBI dominance even more impressive.

What's your lineup? You hitting Rea ahead of Renfroe?
 

Will James

Redshirt
Feb 11, 2013
1,342
0
0
So, you put BY FAR your best RBI producer in the 5-hole, where he gets significantly fewer chances to get those RBIs. You are arguing using sabermetrics -- link to the numbers -- and immediately go against those numbers to support an agenda...

You are owned. Give up. Or don't. This gets more and more hilarious as we go...

Renfroe hasn't improved at all*** You seriously batting Rea in front of Renfroe?
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Renfroe hasn't improved at all*** You seriously batting Rea in front of Renfroe?

Where did I say that? I didn't. You did. That's what your "pure efficiency" approach tells us to do. Basically, your "perfect formula" failed it's very first test.

I'm batting Renfroe third. That's what sabermetrics tells us to do -- no matter how much you try to make it tell us something different.
 

Railin Jemmye

Redshirt
Oct 29, 2012
1,937
0
0
Not quite, pal. You pulled out username smack already. In the past, that's usually the telltale sign when you head for the Midol.

But I do think you're probably a virgin.
 

Will James

Redshirt
Feb 11, 2013
1,342
0
0
Okay Okay here's Cad's lineup

Frazier SS
Bradford CF
Renfroe RF
Rea 1B
Detz 2B
Slauter C
Porter DH
Norris 3B
Henderson LF

Hey! Let's put our top on-base guy... a guy who has a tendency to walk, a lot... a guy who has little power... 5th
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
Okay Okay here's Cad's lineup

Frazier SS
Bradford CF
Renfroe RF
Rea 1B
Detz 2B
Slauter C
Porter DH
Norris 3B
Henderson LF

Hey! Let's put our top on-base guy... a guy who has a tendency to walk, a lot... a guy who has little power... 5th

A little power? Not yet.
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
Destroying me by saying Rea is more feared that Renfroe this season? Thats a joke. Where are you batting Detz?

You are scrambling like a little ***** right now. It's really funny, but I'm starting to feel sorry for you. You just don't know when to stop.
 

engie

Freshman
May 29, 2011
10,756
92
48
Not quite, pal. You pulled out username smack already. In the past, that's usually the telltale sign when you head for the Midol.

But I do think you're probably a virgin.

Lulz. I can only imagine what a panty dropper your bipolar ignorance is to the ladies**

You deserve another nametag -- engie's *****
 

skb124

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2008
1,270
0
0
That lineup may not be what you like, but that does not make that lineup wrong. That's everyone's point. I like that lineup a lot against lefties.
 

shoeless joe

Redshirt
Aug 27, 2009
288
0
0
renfroe hitting 4th is cohen's decision. isnt the first and wont be the last time i disagree with him.

i personally would hit him third but unlike you i hope we score as many as possible and win every game renfroe bats 4th. and when him batting clean up isnt successful i will not get on here and gloat about how smart i am. but hey if thats how you get your kicks then go for it.

more than one way to skin a cat...although i'm sure you know the statistically correst way to do it.
 

CadaverDawg

Redshirt
Dec 5, 2011
6,409
0
0
Im at a loss for words.....

Why would you bat him 5th? To walk Rea over to 2nd?

I already told you...he's a RBI machine. We only have a couple of guys that can hit multiple bombs this year so HR smack isn't proving any arguments. You are trying so desperately hard for a way to grill my lineup, so it will take a little of the embarrassment of this thread. You have been destroyed and no questions you ask me and Engie will change that fact. Boyd would even agree with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.