What is going on at NBC? This seems very strange to me.

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
Not the Maddow fiasco, but the much earlier video of Trump on the famous bus. What we know:

1. The recording occurred about 11 years ago.
2. NBC was in possession of the recording for all that time.
3. NBC chose not to publish the video but instead leaked it to the Wash. Post for publication

Why? Why would Andy Lack, CEO of NBC, turn over this crucial intellectual property to the Wash Post rather than going with this blockbuster of a story themselves? The ratings would have been huge? Why would NBC wait until October 7th to give it to the Post for publication? They had this video for 11 years and could have gone with it or leaked it during the Republican primary? Why wait until very late in the election cycle? As it was, the October 7th leak was right before a debate between Hillary and Trump adding more suspicion to this leak.

I believe Lack ordered the video to be leaked. He did not want NBC's fingerprints on the late release for fear of being labeled biased. He wanted it leaked very late to help Hillary. He did not want it leaked during the primary because it might help Trump's opponents that he felt would easily beat Hillary.

Interesting palace intrigue. Have you ever seen a huge media outlet leak their own intellectual property and an enormous story sure to generate huge ratings and attendant publicity to another media outlet?
 

TN EER

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
1,868
4
0
Topeatal ineptness. ...not really, it seems the latest "thing" in political news is to get someone else to stop the bombshell then pile on. That way if there is blowback, the blame goes elsewhere.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,968
1,891
113
Not the Maddow fiasco, but the much earlier video of Trump on the famous bus. What we know:

1. The recording occurred about 11 years ago.
2. NBC was in possession of the recording for all that time.
3. NBC chose not to publish the video but instead leaked it to the Wash. Post for publication

Why? Why would Andy Lack, CEO of NBC, turn over this crucial intellectual property to the Wash Post rather than going with this blockbuster of a story themselves? The ratings would have been huge? Why would NBC wait until October 7th to give it to the Post for publication? They had this video for 11 years and could have gone with it or leaked it during the Republican primary? Why wait until very late in the election cycle? As it was, the October 7th leak was right before a debate between Hillary and Trump adding more suspicion to this leak.

I believe Lack ordered the video to be leaked. He did not want NBC's fingerprints on the late release for fear of being labeled biased. He wanted it leaked very late to help Hillary. He did not want it leaked during the primary because it might help Trump's opponents that he felt would easily beat Hillary.

Interesting palace intrigue. Have you ever seen a huge media outlet leak their own intellectual property and an enormous story sure to generate huge ratings and attendant publicity to another media outlet?

You've often called them corrupt PAX and this episode certainly is evidence of that. I often call them incompetent and the way they've handled their entire reporting on Trump is proof of that.

So how 'bout we compromise and just call them incompetence corrupted?
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
You've often called them corrupt PAX and this episode certainly is evidence of that. I often call them incompetent and the way they've handled their entire reporting on Trump is proof of that.

So how 'bout we compromise and just call them incompetence corrupted?

LMAO. I could go with that. This leak to the Wash Post so late in the process was both incompetent and corrupt.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,688
1,758
113
Not the Maddow fiasco, but the much earlier video of Trump on the famous bus. What we know:

1. The recording occurred about 11 years ago.
2. NBC was in possession of the recording for all that time.
3. NBC chose not to publish the video but instead leaked it to the Wash. Post for publication

Why? Why would Andy Lack, CEO of NBC, turn over this crucial intellectual property to the Wash Post rather than going with this blockbuster of a story themselves? The ratings would have been huge? Why would NBC wait until October 7th to give it to the Post for publication? They had this video for 11 years and could have gone with it or leaked it during the Republican primary? Why wait until very late in the election cycle? As it was, the October 7th leak was right before a debate between Hillary and Trump adding more suspicion to this leak.

I believe Lack ordered the video to be leaked. He did not want NBC's fingerprints on the late release for fear of being labeled biased. He wanted it leaked very late to help Hillary. He did not want it leaked during the primary because it might help Trump's opponents that he felt would easily beat Hillary.

Interesting palace intrigue. Have you ever seen a huge media outlet leak their own intellectual property and an enormous story sure to generate huge ratings and attendant publicity to another media outlet?
A media organization was trying to influence the elections? Check to see if there are any shared tarmac meetings between Lack and a Russian. Doesn't matter which Russian, just a Russian, any Russian will do. Someone get me a goddamn Russian!!!!!
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
A media organization was trying to influence the elections? Check to see if there are any shared tarmac meetings between Lack and a Russian. Doesn't matter which Russian, just a Russian, any Russian will do. Someone get me a goddamn Russian!!!!!

I bet he had a vodka. Close enough.
 

WVPATX

Freshman
Jan 27, 2005
28,197
91
38
A media organization was trying to influence the elections? Check to see if there are any shared tarmac meetings between Lack and a Russian. Doesn't matter which Russian, just a Russian, any Russian will do. Someone get me a goddamn Russian!!!!!

You are exactly on target. The libs and the media are concerned about Russian interference in our election, well how about our own media and their interference? Rathergate ring a bell? And now Big Dan is a liberal hero. Timing stories to do the most damage possible? Leaking information to hurt your foe (the GOP)? Corrupt media.