What is the board's thoughts on SMART?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shmuley

Heisman
Mar 6, 2008
23,750
10,406
113
When mullens bolts, would love to take a shot at him ...

but can't see him staying in the west and going head up with daddy saban.
 

thatsbaseball

All-American
May 29, 2007
17,806
6,482
113
"Offered free to all riders during its first year". Talking about a charlie foxtrot ! They`ll need to triple the size of the University police force.
 
Last edited:

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
Sure this is good for Vegas. But MDOT has no business in this. Bad use of state tax dollars.

JTRAN is a colossal money pit, and this will be the same. Who is going to pay to sustain it?
 

passwordistaco

Redshirt
Aug 23, 2012
32
27
18
They're not really comparable.

Sure this is good for Vegas. But MDOT has no business in this. Bad use of state tax dollars.

JTRAN is a colossal money pit, and this will be the same. Who is going to pay to sustain it?

JTRAN is a metro bus system in a low density major metro area. Most riders are 'captive riders.'

SMART would operate in a college town. Most riders would be choice riders.

Starkville's land-use has to take this system into account for it to be successful. The South does a really ****** job of aligning land-use, housing/development, and transit policy.
 

RingN2012

Redshirt
Sep 10, 2012
577
0
0
This is awesome for at least one reason. Starkville PD feasts on college kids, handing out DUIs like speeding tickets. There has been a whole lot more money than $2 million spent in fines and lawyer fees alone in the last 10 years, I'd be willing to bet. It will also make the town safer as well.
 

gravedigger

Redshirt
Feb 6, 2009
1,654
0
0
why is it good for a town but a bad use of state tax dollars? If after its been rstablished as a thing that is used for a year, and charged for after, why will its success have any thing to do with Jackson?

Unless you are completely ignorant of departments of transportation, you should know that its mission has everything to do with it
 

rezdawg

Redshirt
Jan 6, 2010
130
21
18
The title says 'Federal Grant', MDOT is just the middle man, no state dollars involved...
 

RocketDawg

All-Conference
Oct 21, 2011
18,916
2,028
113
Not sure why it should use federal funds

Kinda smacks of pork spending. If Starkville/MSU want to do it and believe it's viable, they should pay the bill themselves. I can't think of any small town in the US that actually has a public transit system. And they call a bus system "rapid"? That's normally reserved for subways and light rail.
 

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,796
2,400
113
People, you aren't a traitor to your precious ideology if you don't knee-jerk oppose every use of tax dollars for a good idea. This is good for Starkville and good for MSU.
 

Shmuley

Heisman
Mar 6, 2008
23,750
10,406
113
Rez, don't fall for that ****. The feds may fund the majority of the upfront cost, but there is ALWAYS a back-side cost at the state and local level. ALWAYS. Operating costs, employment related costs, maintenance, upkeep, etc., etc., etc.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
People, you aren't a traitor to your precious ideology if you don't knee-jerk oppose every use of tax dollars for a good idea. This is good for Starkville and good for MSU.


It would also be a "good idea" if Uncle Sam gifted every college town with free setup of a transportation system. And subways & rails to replace interstates and highways. And 3 solid meals for all the poor. And a free house for everybody that can't afford it. And a free Christmas bonus for every American. And and and....****, Uncle Sam is broke.
 

FlabLoser

Redshirt
Aug 20, 2006
10,709
0
0
Rez, don't fall for that ****. The feds may fund the majority of the upfront cost, but there is ALWAYS a back-side cost at the state and local level. ALWAYS. Operating costs, employment related costs, maintenance, upkeep, etc., etc., etc.

Nonsense. Don't you remember when Clinton put 100,000 extra cops on the streets. He kept us safe!

Don't you remember how the Feds shored up medicate my mandating that states shake the money tree and pick up the slack?

Ha
 

godlluB

Redshirt
Sep 24, 2012
504
0
0
The city and MSU have already tried this once, and it was a failure. I dont' think I ever saw more than two people on a bus. Most of the time, empty buses just drove around town burning up diesel for no reason. This isn't good for anybody.
 

SignalToNoise

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
741
0
0
If it were a good idea, i.e. market demand, a private venture would have started and become very profitable already. It wouldn't take a grant from the feds to come to fruition.

So, I think it is a waste.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,169
25,217
113
It doesn't make it any better use of taxpayer dollars if the money comes from the Federal, State or local government. It's all being paid for by all of us. And yeah, I realize that most of the money coming from Federal grants is being paid by taxpayers in other states, but at the same time we're paying for local projects in their states too. All government projects should be funded as locally as possible. Then each community could decide what level of government service they wanted to pay for.
 

Maroon Eagle

All-American
May 24, 2006
17,875
7,647
102
I worked for a few months at Stanford after earning my BA. One thing I really loved was that Stanford and the Santa Clara County Transit System were pretty integrated. Not only could Santa Clara buses stop at some places on the Stanford campus but Stanford also had a transit system that went between the college and Palo Alto. I often took the Stanford Shuttle from the Palo Alto train & bus station. I remember mentioning that to the SA President when he was talking to students about that when I was a grad student at MSU.
 

johnson86-1

All-Conference
Aug 22, 2012
14,205
4,727
113
I would have loved it when I was in Starkville

People, you aren't a traitor to your precious ideology if you don't knee-jerk oppose every use of tax dollars for a good idea. This is good for Starkville and good for MSU.

Nothing better than somebody else paying for your DD in a ridiculously inefficient manner.

But I'm not sure I'm pumped about wasting money on it now that I won't benefit from it.
 

Spanky.sixpack

Redshirt
Jul 6, 2012
498
0
0
It's a very good thing......

Is it a good use of tax dollars? That's debatable, but it doesn't matter. What many in this thread don't realize is that the money is GOING TO BE WASTED by our government. That's not changing. May as well have them use it in Mississippi and Starkville.
 

pDigital32Dawg

Freshman
Aug 29, 2009
2,996
85
48
I want something to drive the area to develop more appropriately around MSU instead of placing everything down Hwy 12. I would imagine a transit system will provide some comfort to developers that there will be a dedicated route to areas that once were less trafficked by students. And as seen in earlier posts, it will provide some security to students that you do not have to live in the Cotton District just to avoid driving after a round at the bar.
 

BehrDawg

Redshirt
Jan 21, 2010
1,370
0
0
Sure this is good for Vegas. But MDOT has no business in this. Bad use of state tax dollars.

JTRAN is a colossal money pit, and this will be the same. Who is going to pay to sustain it?

No one rides JTRAN except for the homeless. The system in Starkville will have plenty of paying riders. When was the last time you saw a full JTRAN bus? I have never seen one
 

seshomoru

Junior
Apr 24, 2006
5,544
202
63
Congratulations on going to class...

the one day they discussed Classical Theory in Intro to Macroeconomics.
 

thunderclap

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2008
3,089
0
0
I have never understood why this country doesn't develop public transportation everywhere. Anyone who has ever lived anywhere else knows what I am talking about. Great to see Starkville do this.
 

SignalToNoise

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
741
0
0
I realize it is popular to be an internet hardass on this board -- myself included -- but I have read much more into economics than just showing up to the first day of macro.

Congratulations on being a jackass!
 

esplanade91

Redshirt
Dec 9, 2010
5,656
0
0
Well, taxpayers' money aside, I love this. I sold my car because I moved cross country and I figured I didn't need one because I live in the Cotton District while I'm at school and I have a roommate with a car.

I walk or ride my bike to class every day of the week, and I love it, but sometimes I have to scrounge for a ride when it rains or I'm running late.

I'm also at the mercy of my roommate when it comes to Walmart.

Raining and Walmart are the only issues, and outside of that I am successfully living in Starkville without a car.

The parking problem has gotten so bad, and hopefully this allows parents to send their kids to school without a vehicle.

..... That being said, one campus shutte running to the Cotton District instead of having what seems like 10 orange route busses would be much more feasible, less of a burden on taxpayers, and more desirable for students (it would take me right to Montgomery). The last time I was at Ole Miss (women and stuff) I noticed that their campus shuttles ran during the day to and from commuter hotspots (ie apartment buildings, the square, popular "house" areas like the cotton district). I don't see why we don't have the same program.
 

Yellowfin

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
72
0
0
I think SMART is a tremendous idea. With a growing student enrollment, I am all for using a bus system to take some of the commuter cars off of Hwy 12. Plus, I don't think anyone wants to pave more of campus for parking. You can forget a parking garage, simply costs too much. If you hae a better idea on how to get commuter students to campus, minimize traffic congestion, and keep campus from becoming one large parking lot, let's hear it. You cannot get more conservative than me, but this is an intelligent use of tax dollars.
 

saltslugs

Redshirt
Oct 9, 2009
1,500
0
0
Too spread out. Not enough interest. Tends to be used by "undesirables". Doesn't pay for itself. Etc...

It always seems good on paper, but it wont' work. Three years and then it will be greatly contracted if not totally abandoned after generally being a waste of money.
 

thunderclap

Redshirt
Feb 25, 2008
3,089
0
0
It works in thousands and thousands of places. I get that America is laid out for the automobile and gas stations, which is part of the problem, but that doesn't mean it won't work.
 

BoomBoom.sixpack

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
810
0
0
^This.

There already IS a fm solution to getting lots of people with cars to a central location: huge parking lots/garages and congested roads. If you don't want that, then you have to 'waste' money doing it another way. Yeah, it will cost some money, but how much will a parking garage and widened roads cost?
 

rugbdawg

Redshirt
Oct 10, 2006
5,251
0
0
Great News

I lived in Boulder for three years when going to school. Everyone rode the bus to school and work. Buses ran until 2 am in the morning. So, as long as you left the bar a half hour before closing, you had a ride home. Those buses were packed.
 

saltslugs

Redshirt
Oct 9, 2009
1,500
0
0
We live in the South.

I doubt you can name a town of our size in the South that has successfully integrated public transportation. What you need for public transportation to work: (1) A town that hard to drive/park in, (2) People who don't have access to a car and/or (3) High population density.

You don't have any of these in Starkville. Who exactly do ya'll think will be using this public transport? Could you have imagined routinely using a bus in Starkville, knowing that you can easily drive anywhere? Sure, it will be used occasionally by students (most of whom have cars and disposable income) and during game weekends and what not, bu there's just not adequate demand in general.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.