What is your take on sponsor patches?
- Thread starter Ranchdawg
- Start date
MLB started doing it about 3 years ago.
I personally don’t like it but as long as they don’t look like a NASCAR, it’ll be fine.
Hell everything else has a sponsor or family name attached to it now it seems.
I personally don’t like it but as long as they don’t look like a NASCAR, it’ll be fine.
Hell everything else has a sponsor or family name attached to it now it seems.
Adidas does that already so there will be no change with just a patch. The way we argue about helmet color, helmet and jersey logos not sure we will have time to debate sponsors patches as well. I already spend way too much time debating that crap, not sure I can work in sponsor patches too and maintain some type of work schedule
It's gonna be awesome! A color to suit everyone.Personally, I hate the idea. Our sorts teams are supposed to represent Mississippi State!
We have 7th year seniors playing college ball.. I think we’re beyond caring about a patch on a uniform.
Bush League, my wife is tired of me bitching about it on the MLB jerseys, but we still watch every night. Don't get me started on why can we have an MLB Network subscription but yet constantly have games broadcast on other networks that are blacked out to us. (thanks Fanduel)Personally, I hate the idea. Our sorts teams are supposed to represent Mississippi State!
If it will buy us a good left tackle and a couple of edge rushers, go for it.
UPS and FedEx?!
TMobile and ATT twice?!...and cspire twice, but comeon.
Chevy and Ford?!...and Hyundai, but comeon.
Shell twice?!
If we can get this level of sponsorship, MSU will dominate the transfer portal.
We would be THE university that managed to bring competing brands together!
