What if we had given Surace a possession to manage in each Big Ten games and his completion percentage was 70% in Big Ten play.. what would everyone be saying now?
Sure, AK is much improved.. really since November of last year. Which got us an bowl game and extra practice.. for those players that were here. But we really do not know what Surace could bring.
And yet, we like what AK has given us. As other point out, the D is the reason for losses. And we find fault with some playcalling.. but there is also flaws in AK's game. Flaws that, perhaps, Surace can solve. And then, you'd have to imagine the coaches that see these two every day would make the right decision. They know a lot more about it. And yet again, we have seen cases where injuries cause personel changes at all levels of football and we see the guy from the bench outplay the guy who had been the starter.. with all kinds of experience on professional coaching staffs.
So, yeah, give Surace the first possession in the second half. That's what we should do.