Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 132102512" data-attributes="member: 1428007">Dana Holgorsen averaged 7 wins per season&nbsp; overall as per WVUs historical average. The last five years it was 8 wins per year average. Last 4 above 8.&nbsp; He came in a year early when the previous coach had to be removed for wrongdoing damaging the program.&nbsp; His very first year he did better than the previous coach.&nbsp; Won 10 games.&nbsp; Won the Big East.&nbsp; Coached WVU an entire season into a major bowl game and won that bowl game in historical fashion.&nbsp; Then he took a deficient roster because of underrecruiting into a tough new league mostly very far away— beat ranked teams and continued winning at a pace to keep WVU no worse than its historical average Against the toughest schedules WVU had faced to date.&nbsp; This is why Dana Holgorsen EARNED the years he did.Neal Brown has not earned the three years he has been at WVU let alone more seasons.&nbsp; He is winning 5 games a year with one being an fcs and one Kansas ( and in both cases barely at that) , faring poorly against P5 competition and finishing in the bottom of the league every year.&nbsp; He hasn’t produced any rankings for WVU since he has been at WVU or won any significant games.There is no comparison.&nbsp; Bill Stewart performed better and he was a severe let down from RR.The nonsensical spins pretending Brown has been good for WVU football are laughable on their face.&nbsp; Hopefully Harrell is the coach he has been proclaimed to be and he can get the points needed to win the games Brown could not, or else it’s time to move on.&nbsp; Just as I said before, WVU cannot continue its losing ways under Brown if it wants to remain relevant in college football— the realignment people attacked me for telling them was coming is now well underway and everyone won’t survive it from the P5.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 132102512, member: 1428007"] Dana Holgorsen averaged 7 wins per season overall as per WVUs historical average. The last five years it was 8 wins per year average. Last 4 above 8. He came in a year early when the previous coach had to be removed for wrongdoing damaging the program. His very first year he did better than the previous coach. Won 10 games. Won the Big East. Coached WVU an entire season into a major bowl game and won that bowl game in historical fashion. Then he took a deficient roster because of underrecruiting into a tough new league mostly very far away— beat ranked teams and continued winning at a pace to keep WVU no worse than its historical average Against the toughest schedules WVU had faced to date. This is why Dana Holgorsen EARNED the years he did. Neal Brown has not earned the three years he has been at WVU let alone more seasons. He is winning 5 games a year with one being an fcs and one Kansas ( and in both cases barely at that) , faring poorly against P5 competition and finishing in the bottom of the league every year. He hasn’t produced any rankings for WVU since he has been at WVU or won any significant games. There is no comparison. Bill Stewart performed better and he was a severe let down from RR. The nonsensical spins pretending Brown has been good for WVU football are laughable on their face. Hopefully Harrell is the coach he has been proclaimed to be and he can get the points needed to win the games Brown could not, or else it’s time to move on. Just as I said before, WVU cannot continue its losing ways under Brown if it wants to remain relevant in college football— the realignment people attacked me for telling them was coming is now well underway and everyone won’t survive it from the P5. [/QUOTE]

Name