Why are Dems hanging on pinning Epstein to Trump?

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,714
3,047
113
Know this: if there were any reason or evidence they had to tie Trump to the known Pedophile, you can bet your last Democrat dollar they would have used it by now! So why is it that all of a sudden, they're so interested in what Trump knew about Epstein and when did he know it? This is especially perplexing when you consider that most of Epstein's "clients" were in fact more sympathetic to Democrats if not Democrats themselves!

Chalk it up to desperation, or the time honored Leftist tactic of using smears and innuendos through guilt by association. Lacking any effective policy alternatives to defeat Trump's ongoing successful agenda that's killing the Left and exposing them as the wacko nut jobs they are, linking Trump in any way shape or form to the Pedo creep gives them their only hope of eroding his support or effectiveness implementing his policies.

It's nothing more than desperation disguised as moral outrage over a guy they all virtually ignored until Trump ascended to power.

Jeffrey Epstein: Democrat Character Witness?

excerpt:
The thing to remember about the political left is that there is literally no bottom for them to hit, only an endless pit of shame, stupidity and hypocrisy through which they forever fall. That’s how you end up with the party putting up known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein as a would-be character assassin against President Donald Trump.
.....
Epstein was a big-time Democratic Party donor, which means he judged the “progressive left” to be his type of people more than Republicans and Donald Trump. Is that something you’d really brag about or even think would be a point of pride for anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together or any semblance of a moral compass?

....
It says something about a party when it uses a monster to make a political point. It says something more about them when they don’t realize their hatred for their opponent has them siding with that monster while claiming to “care” about that person’s victims.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WVUALLEN and 30CAT

30CAT

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
170,530
3,910
113
Know this: if there were any reason or evidence they had to tie Trump to the known Pedophile, you can bet your last Democrat dollar they would have used it by now! So why is it that all of a sudden, they're so interested in what Trump knew about Epstein and when did he know it? This is especially perplexing when you consider that most of Epstein's "clients" were in fact more sympathetic to Democrats if not Democrats themselves!

Chalk it up to desperation, or the time honored Leftist tactic of using smears and innuendos through guilt by association. Lacking any effective policy alternatives to defeat Trump's ongoing successful agenda that's killing the Left and exposing them as the wacko nut jobs they are, linking Trump in any way shape or form to the Pedo creep gives them their only hope of eroding his support or effectiveness implementing his policies.

It's nothing more than desperation disguised as moral outrage over a guy they all virtually ignored until Trump ascended to power.

Jeffrey Epstein: Democrat Character Witness?

excerpt:
The thing to remember about the political left is that there is literally no bottom for them to hit, only an endless pit of shame, stupidity and hypocrisy through which they forever fall. That’s how you end up with the party putting up known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein as a would-be character assassin against President Donald Trump.
.....
Epstein was a big-time Democratic Party donor, which means he judged the “progressive left” to be his type of people more than Republicans and Donald Trump. Is that something you’d really brag about or even think would be a point of pride for anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together or any semblance of a moral compass?

....
It says something about a party when it uses a monster to make a political point. It says something more about them when they don’t realize their hatred for their opponent has them siding with that monster while claiming to “care” about that person’s victims.

Because they are desperate, dumbasses who have turned to Marxism. That won't fly across America, The Beautiful.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
Know this: if there were any reason or evidence they had to tie Trump to the known Pedophile, you can bet your last Democrat dollar they would have used it by now! So why is it that all of a sudden, they're so interested in what Trump knew about Epstein and when did he know it? This is especially perplexing when you consider that most of Epstein's "clients" were in fact more sympathetic to Democrats if not Democrats themselves!

Chalk it up to desperation, or the time honored Leftist tactic of using smears and innuendos through guilt by association. Lacking any effective policy alternatives to defeat Trump's ongoing successful agenda that's killing the Left and exposing them as the wacko nut jobs they are, linking Trump in any way shape or form to the Pedo creep gives them their only hope of eroding his support or effectiveness implementing his policies.

It's nothing more than desperation disguised as moral outrage over a guy they all virtually ignored until Trump ascended to power.

Jeffrey Epstein: Democrat Character Witness?

excerpt:
The thing to remember about the political left is that there is literally no bottom for them to hit, only an endless pit of shame, stupidity and hypocrisy through which they forever fall. That’s how you end up with the party putting up known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein as a would-be character assassin against President Donald Trump.
.....
Epstein was a big-time Democratic Party donor, which means he judged the “progressive left” to be his type of people more than Republicans and Donald Trump. Is that something you’d really brag about or even think would be a point of pride for anyone with 2 brain cells to rub together or any semblance of a moral compass?

....
It says something about a party when it uses a monster to make a political point. It says something more about them when they don’t realize their hatred for their opponent has them siding with that monster while claiming to “care” about that person’s victims.

There's going to be some Republicans involved in these Conspiracies too. At least a few.





 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,714
3,047
113
Democrat cooked goose just in time for Thanksgiving.
The only thing funnier than watching them grasping at straws trying anything they hope will impede Trump's policy progress, is watching how whatever they try utterly blows up in their Leftist faces as soon as they try it! :ROFLMAO:

Just a bunch of worthless loser screeching jackals! :cautious:
 
Last edited:

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
Is this why Democrats all of sudden wanted to release it. So they could claim Bill and Hillary shouldn't have to interview. Hey Comer stop giving them more time. They are trying to push it beyond the Holiday Break.





Bill and Hillary Clinton Risk Prison Over Epstein ‘Silence’—James Comer​

 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113



From 2000 when Republicans had Clinton by the balls.



More immediately, however, the arms sale also reflects the fact that Israel’s burgeoning high-tech economy and substantial defense industry — capitalized in part by U.S. aid — position it to take an increasingly aggressive role in a global arms market increasingly hungry for the weapons of advanced, electronic-age warfare. “In this market of the defense industries of the world, in this competition, there are no friends,” said Sneh. “Everyone is competing without mercy against everyone.” That, of course, is not the way U.S. legislators see it, and a threat last week from the House Foreign Aid Committee to deduct the value of the sale from Israel’s aid package suggests the White House may face growing domestic pressure to lean on the Barak and his government — not least because China itself lurks as a perennial hot-button domestic issue at election time. Israel can count on strong support in both parties on Capitol Hill when it comes to the peace process, and Republicans were even happy to underwrite former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s constant efforts to sabotage it, but kissing up to China might offend some traditionally pro-Israel GOP conservatives. Still, Barak might not tempt fate unless he was fairly secure in Israel’s ability, if push comes to shove, to muster greater congressional support than its critics. After all, he ultimately knows where his bread is buttered.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113


politicians in 1996​

By Maxim Kniazkov


The Chinese government launched a covert operation in 1996 in a bid to influence the US political process and gain wide access to officeholders through political donations, a US Senate panel has concluded.
The conclusion is contained in a report quietly released by the Senate Intelligence Committee last week. It went largely unnoticed until Friday, when the Federation of American Scientists publicized it on its website.

The Senate probe was prompted by allegations that China had tried to funnel 300,000 dollars into the 1996 reelection campaign of former president Bill Clinton through Democratic Party fundraiser Johnny Chung.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113


Two Democratic Party money men are in trouble with the law.

Democratic fund-raiser Johnny Chung was charged Thursday with funneling money to the Clinton-Gore re-election campaign by asking others to make contributions, then reimbursing them.

And Yogesh Gandhi, suspected of illegally funneling $325,000 in foreign contributions to the Democratic Party, appeared in federal court on unrelated fraud charges after being arrested as he prepared to fly home to India.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
Yes, President Bill Clinton's administration actively pushed for and supported China's entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO), signing legislation in 2000 to grant China permanent normal trade relations (PNTR). This move was a key part of a larger trade agreement with China in 1999 that paved the way for China's full WTO membership in 2001. Clinton argued that WTO membership would open China's markets to the U.S. and encourage reforms within China.
  • 1999: The U.S. and China reached a bilateral agreement that would allow China to join the WTO. In this deal, China agreed to cut tariffs and open its markets to U.S. goods and services, while the U.S. agreed to support China's entry and end the annual, contentious debate over China's trade status.
  • 2000: In October 2000, Clinton signed legislation granting China Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR). This removed the annual congressional review of China's trade status and locked in the market access agreed upon in the 1999 deal.
  • 2001: China officially joined the WTO in December 2001, following the groundwork laid by the Clinton administration.
  • Clinton's rationale: Clinton's administration framed this as a strategic move for both U.S. economic interests and foreign policy. He argued that engaging China through the WTO was the best way to promote reform, open markets, and build a better future, stating, "If China is willing to play by the global rules of trade, it would be an inexplicable mistake for the United States to say no".
  • Opposition: The policy faced significant opposition, particularly from labor unions and human rights activists, who feared job losses in the U.S. and believed that granting this trade status would reduce U.S. leverage on human rights issues.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
Reports from various research institutes and news organizations indicate that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses a network of allied activist groups and media channels to amplify pro-Palestinian narratives and anti-U.S./anti-Israel sentiment, as part of a broader
propaganda effort to discredit the West and expand China's global influence.
Key findings from these reports include:
  • Funding Network: A U.S. businessman based in Shanghai, Neville Roy Singham, has reportedly funded a wide-reaching network of activist groups (including The People's Forum, ANSWER Coalition, and CodePink) that promote anti-U.S. and anti-Israel agendas. This network is accused of using "dark money" channels to obscure the source of funds, prompting investigations by U.S. authorities.
  • Narrative Alignment: The messaging pushed by these groups frames the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a struggle against "U.S. imperialism," which aligns closely with official CCP propaganda and state media narratives. The CCP aims to portray itself as a champion of peace and justice while casting the U.S. as the source of global conflict and division.
  • Amplifying Domestic Divisions: The propaganda efforts exploit existing divisions within American society, depicting U.S. authorities as violent and repressive in their handling of protests, in contrast to the supposedly peaceful demonstrators.
  • Media and Social Media Use: China's state-run media (like Xinhua and CGTN) and platforms like TikTok are alleged to amplify anti-Western and pro-Palestinian content, using algorithms to promote narratives aligned with Chinese interests.
  • Goal: Analysts suggest the ultimate goal of these efforts is to undermine U.S. influence, particularly in the Middle East and the Global South, and to foster internal chaos and distraction within Western nations.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
Benjamin Netanyahu has distanced Israel from China by accusing it of leading an "information blockade" and "political siege," and by signaling a strategic shift towards alignment with the West amid growing international isolation
. While these statements reflect a political and rhetorical distance, the economic relationship remains, though strained by China's support for Palestinian and Iranian narratives, its defense ties with Iran, and China's own growing influence in the region.

Key points of separation
  • Information blockade claims: Netanyahu accused China of orchestrating an online "information blockade" against Israel using social media and AI, a claim that China has flatly rejected.
  • Political and strategic shift: He has suggested a strategic move away from a balanced relationship with both Washington and Beijing towards a closer alignment with the U.S. and Europe. This is partly a response to Israel's perception of isolation and partly an attempt to appeal to anti-China sentiment in the U.S..
  • Economic interdependence: Despite the rhetoric, Israel recognizes the need to maintain economic ties, but the relationship is strained. Israel is concerned about potential blocks to its war industries, with China and Qatar being named as potential sources of such pressure.
  • China's stance: China has condemned the Israeli military campaign in Gaza, called for a ceasefire, and labeled Iran's missile attack on Israel as "self-defense," further souring relations. China has also worked to enhance its own influence by proposing peace plans and hosting talks between Palestinian factions.
  • Past and present context: While historically cordial, the relationship is now more strained. China's actions, particularly its support for Palestinian and Iranian narratives and its defense ties with Iran, have tempered what was once an optimistic partnership.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113



You are over target but it's much bigger than you realize and it involves.

CCP
North Korea
Venezuela, Colombia, and Mexican Drug Cartels
Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis. Muslim Brotherhood, and other Islamic Groups.
Antifa International
Illegal Weapons Sales
Uranium
Human Trafficking
Open Borders
Money Laundering
and a plethora of other Treasonous behavior to enrich themselves while offering Socialism to everyone else so you surrender and accept their goals.


 

30CAT

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
170,530
3,910
113
As I said earlier...Democrats are going to wish they had left this sleeping dog lie.

They risked it all with the thought they were going to "get Trump."

They've only proven to be what they keep claiming Trump is.
 
  • Love
Reactions: atlkvb

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113




It's not about one County. It's about who controlled the Countries and the Intelligence Agencies at that time. What were their goals. What Countries where doing business with the Clinton Foundation after he left office.

Now how many of the Countries have new leaders attempting to go in a different direction? People need to focus on the Individuals involved and their shared business goals. Because those individuals came from several countries.
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
80,714
3,047
113
As I said earlier...Democrats are going to wish they had left this sleeping dog lie.

They risked it all with the thought they were going to "get Trump."

They've only proven to be what they keep claiming Trump is.
Isn't that (underlined in bold) the delicious irony behind all of their cooked up, "get Trump" schemes @30CAT my man? :unsure: I mean literally everything they've tried...from "Lawfare"...to "insurrection"...to...illegal spying....to Epstein...to "sedition"...you name it...almost everything they try to pin on Trump in an attempt to dispose of him THEY end up being 100% guilty of!

It's absolutely amazing but not nearly as amusing to me! They step on a rake every time...they must have studied "Wile E Coyote" cartoons! :ROFLMAO:

 
  • Haha
Reactions: 30CAT

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113




It's not about one County. It's about who controlled the Countries and the Intelligence Agencies at that time. What were their goals. What Countries where doing business with the Clinton Foundation after he left office.

Now how many of the Countries have new leaders attempting to go in a different direction? People need to focus on the Individuals involved and their shared business goals. Because those individuals came from several countries.











 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
That's a theory however there's definitely a money trail.






Holy Hell ... even the all-powerful CFR board of directors passed around a 'collection plate' to all of the their 5,400 membership roster and some $350,000 fell out of the pockets of their BILLIONAIRES (Hoffman included) onto that plate. It was done to SWEEP the Epstein STAIN under the CFR rug as HE HELD MEMBERSHIP IN THAT POWERFUL ROSTER FROM 1995 THROUGH 2009!!! The CFR board of directors dropped him from membership, after his Florida conviction, and cut a check to some 'human trafficking' concern for $350K which they calculated was equal to Epstein's paid membership fees for those 14 years along with his personal FINANCIAL gifts he made to the CFR coffers over that period. It was a tough decision for the board to select which media outlet would publish Epstein's membership and their $350K gift! Joe Kahn, head of NY Times holds membership. Billionaire Laurene Powell Jobs, owner of 'The Atlantic' holds membership and is on the CFR board. Billionaire Michael Bloomberg, owner of Bloomberg News, holds membership. But hell, Cesar Conde, CEO of NBCUniversal who is on the CFR board of directors, raised his hand and said 'hell, let me do it' ... I will publish a one-off short BLURB on Epstein's CFR 14 yr membership. Since CFR controls 90% of MSM, no other media SEIZED on the NBC article and the Epstein's membership in the MOST powerful club in America was reduced to a ONE-OFF blurb. What is even more egregious is the fact that Bill Clinton, George Soros, Jamie Dimon (CEO of JPMorgan Chase which FINANCED Epstein) all hold CFR membership, a Rockefeller lineage 'crime syndicate ... no NEWSWORTH events on that roster! Since Rockefeller installed Dulles at CIA in 1953, all CIA directors since (right up to Burns under Biden, were assigned off the CFR membership roster .
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
Great Article by a former JAH Officer on how it works. Not going to let this go either. If Trump's DOJ doesn't take action he is going to lose a lot of support. Period.

What they did is Psychological Operations 101.

They also knew what this article explains prior to their actions. So we don't want to hear their ******** excuses. Matter of fact it's in their training records.



30-Year JAG Veteran Schools Democrats for Video Calling for Sedition in the Military​


 
  • Angry
Reactions: 30CAT

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
57,978
2,283
113
The same fvcking tactics.







Because they want a Civil War or are giving aid and comfort to our enemies.






They are upset because their military is being depleted by targeting the most violent.


 
Last edited: