Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Samuel S" data-source="post: 129384163" data-attributes="member: 1754664">One,&nbsp; Holgorsen has more immediate concerns than the&nbsp; 2019 roster. Two, even if he is still the coach, one player, no matter how good Sills&nbsp; turns out to be, having used up his&nbsp; eligibility should not&nbsp; be that critical when we will have had the opportunity to add about 100 new players between now and 2019.&nbsp; Of course, one must also point out that because Holgorsen has already had the opportunity to add about 100 new players since 2012, that it's absurd to say that any of our current issues can even slightly be attributed to anyone who preceded Holgorsen.&nbsp;&nbsp; Finally, I'd invite anyone to take a look at our 2011 roster and explain to the board the grounds for arguing this team has more talent or depth than Holgorsen inherited. Do a side-by-side of the units on both sides of the ball. Can you identify a single unit that is measurably better? Personally, I think a highly debatable claim that we are a little better at DB and RB is plausible. I don't think it's plausible to claim any of the other units are even as good, let alone better. &nbsp;&nbsp; Ask yourself this as well: Which teams from WVU's past would this team beat more often than it got beat?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Samuel S, post: 129384163, member: 1754664"] One, Holgorsen has more immediate concerns than the 2019 roster. Two, even if he is still the coach, one player, no matter how good Sills turns out to be, having used up his eligibility should not be that critical when we will have had the opportunity to add about 100 new players between now and 2019. Of course, one must also point out that because Holgorsen has already had the opportunity to add about 100 new players since 2012, that it's absurd to say that any of our current issues can even slightly be attributed to anyone who preceded Holgorsen. Finally, I'd invite anyone to take a look at our 2011 roster and explain to the board the grounds for arguing this team has more talent or depth than Holgorsen inherited. Do a side-by-side of the units on both sides of the ball. Can you identify a single unit that is measurably better? Personally, I think a highly debatable claim that we are a little better at DB and RB is plausible. I don't think it's plausible to claim any of the other units are even as good, let alone better. Ask yourself this as well: Which teams from WVU's past would this team beat more often than it got beat? [/QUOTE]

Name