Why do you liberals hate non-whites?

Dec 27, 2008
427
93
0
There are many reasons why companies have been moving south in the past 40 years. You attempting to make a very complex issue into a simple statement is very predictable for a wingnut like yourself.

But you are right about right to work states being one of the many reasons. Most states in the south became right to work before northern states so companies moved to increase profits by keeping labor costs down. Believe it or not, I would be considered an expert in this type of thing. I've only been working on corporate economic strategy for the past 20 years so I understand this just a little.

It is pretty simple. The more you tax something the less you have. The south has better weather, except for hurricanes, tornadoes. If labor costs were the same, and business were treated well, the companies wouldn't leave the north. Liberals will continue to think that they can eliminate all problems and be all things to all people. You can't. People need to start taking care of themselves. I guess you've notice how NY runs TV ads that tout how much better they are for business now with lower taxes. If lower taxes are good now, why wasn't it good in the last 30 years? I would never consider moving my business to a liberal state no matter what they claimed. You can't trust them to not pull the rug out when they see fit.
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
It is pretty simple. The more you tax something the less you have. The south has better weather, except for hurricanes, tornadoes. If labor costs were the same, and business were treated well, the companies wouldn't leave the north. Liberals will continue to think that they can eliminate all problems and be all things to all people. You can't. People need to start taking care of themselves. I guess you've notice how NY runs TV ads that tout how much better they are for business now with lower taxes. If lower taxes are good now, why wasn't it good in the last 30 years? I would never consider moving my business to a liberal state no matter what they claimed. You can't trust them to not pull the rug out when they see fit.
I think I understand these concepts. The point made was you don't understand cause and effect of instituting right to work states to being a big part of wage stagnation. I don't expect you to understand
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
It's taking way too long. Trying to insult me? I'm from WV and live in the Roanoke Valley. Are you from san Francisco? You sound a little *****.
Just because one sounds ***** doesn't necessarily make him *****. But at least 95% of those who are ***** are liberals. The other 5% are afraid of being called liberal ,so they claim to be independent.
and nobody died looking for him
 

mneilmont

New member
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
And, who are we supposed to believe? Someone who obviously has an inside track in DC, or those poor bastards who got killed while out taking a walk one night. I have seen some of the idiots on TV who said they went along for the stroll when about 6 people in uniform were killed. Then those old folks bitching because their sons were killed by those fine people who do not like to see people walking around for no obvious reason. Poop, can you imagine what kind of people these people are for making false accusation against those who we know would not want to harm an American? And our president was screaming "workplace violence" while he was entertaining the upstanding parents of this bergbrain who was only wanting to warn the brass of the poor guidance Bergbrain and his mates were receiving - even said such actions could get someone hurt. ****.
 
Dec 27, 2008
427
93
0
I think I understand these concepts. The point made was you don't understand cause and effect of instituting right to work states to being a big part of wage stagnation. I don't expect you to understand

Lets get this straight, the states with right to work are the ones who are over-regulating this country. the RTW states instituted Obamacare which has caused businesses not to hire, RTW states have caused businesses to not hire for fear of having even more federal regulations imposed? Wage stagnation is a direct result of this Presidents economic policies causing too many people chasing too few jobs. That is the real culprit. i wouldn't expect you to understand simple math. Too much=low demand=low cost. Too few=more demand=higher cost. Govt can not create demand. Govt creates nothing but does destroy initiative. Hey, what do I know. My gross revenues went down by 25%. I cut my staff's hours and cost by as much as I could. Simple math. What real business has to do to survive. RTW states have nothing to do with it.
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Lets get this straight, the states with right to work are the ones who are over-regulating this country. the RTW states instituted Obamacare which has caused businesses not to hire, RTW states have caused businesses to not hire for fear of having even more federal regulations imposed? Wage stagnation is a direct result of this Presidents economic policies causing too many people chasing too few jobs. That is the real culprit. i wouldn't expect you to understand simple math. Too much=low demand=low cost. Too few=more demand=higher cost. Govt can not create demand. Govt creates nothing but does destroy initiative. Hey, what do I know. My gross revenues went down by 25%. I cut my staff's hours and cost by as much as I could. Simple math. What real business has to do to survive. RTW states have nothing to do with it.
What? You may want to google "right to work states". Why you continue to post while being totally ignorant is beyond me.
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
Because liberals like you have completely ruined this country.
So.......have you googled 'right to work states' yet and realize your perspective is totally backwards yet? And this isn't the first time you have polluted this board with posts with a point that is not only whacked, it isn't even on point.
 
Dec 27, 2008
427
93
0
So.......have you googled 'right to work states' yet and realize your perspective is totally backwards yet? And this isn't the first time you have polluted this board with posts with a point that is not only whacked, it isn't even on point.

I'm in a right to work state, what is there to know, the economy is better. It could be better but with this marxist president it won't. NY is running ads that tout all the business taxes they've cut. Do you think that that is by accident? Competition from right to work states are causing business to relocate there. It doesn't matter what happens in RTW states because if you ahve a job, you are much happier in life. Inner cities don't have jobs and just welfare, how happy are they? I guess all the shootings there and killing is celebratory. Liberals like yourself should be forced to live in the areas that are desolate because of your liberal policies.
 
Dec 27, 2008
427
93
0
So.......have you googled 'right to work states' yet and realize your perspective is totally backwards yet? And this isn't the first time you have polluted this board with posts with a point that is not only whacked, it isn't even on point.

I did google and found this:
1. RTW staes from 2004-2014 wages increased 15.4% in 22 states
2.Wages increase by 8.4% in 26 states
3. Indian, Michigan and Wisconsin became RTW states in the ;last 5 years and were considered non right to work states and their positive growth help skew the results even more favorable for union states.
4. Do you think there's a reason that the states showing marked improvement are embracing anti-union positions.
5. If WV wants to compete, it had better get it's act together. The disability/SS scam is a big problem too.
 

WVUBRU

New member
Aug 7, 2001
24,731
62
0
I did google and found this:
1. RTW staes from 2004-2014 wages increased 15.4% in 22 states
2.Wages increase by 8.4% in 26 states
3. Indian, Michigan and Wisconsin became RTW states in the ;last 5 years and were considered non right to work states and their positive growth help skew the results even more favorable for union states.
4. Do you think there's a reason that the states showing marked improvement are embracing anti-union positions.
5. If WV wants to compete, it had better get it's act together. The disability/SS scam is a big problem too.
Thanks for educating yourself and now realize that RTW states are opposite to what you were arguing last night. You can thank me later for pushing you in the right direction without humiliating you more than what you did yourself.
 
Dec 27, 2008
427
93
0
Thanks for educating yourself and now realize that RTW states are opposite to what you were arguing last night. You can thank me later for pushing you in the right direction without humiliating you more than what you did yourself.

How is the fact that wages double compared to non right to work states humiliating? If it weren't for the three states I mentioned being lumped in with those non rTW states, the increased wages would be even more dramatic. You had better face some facts
1. Capital goes where it is treated well. It is treated better in RTW states than non RTW states
2.Labor practices, ss/disability scams will cost you jobs.
3. WV had better get with the times or it will continue the decline.
4.Business taxes are onerous. That's why NY is advertising how they are lower taxes. Something that many states in the south already knew.
5. The states with the best job growth have the best tax policy for business. Kaisch did a good job in Ohio and he's to be commended for changing the focus. He's done if by adopting some of the same principles as RTW states but has been able to accomplish this in a non rTW. It can be done by both but you have to realize, RTW states have an inherent advantage.
6. As more people are employeed, the demand for labor exceeds the work force, the wages will increase. That will drive up wages more in the RTW states where employment continues to be better.
 
Dec 27, 2008
427
93
0
What? You may want to google "right to work states". Why you continue to post while being totally ignorant is beyond me.

I just reread my post, should have put question marks after all of my sentences. You were blaming rTW states for causing wage stagnation, correct? The real cause of wage stagnation is Obama and his job killing Healthcare law, marxist ideas and regulations. RTW states are competing with non RTW, union, states. Which one is winning? The one with more job growth or the one with declining population and job loss?