is rubbing some people the wrong way, but I can at least agree with parts of it. All I can vouch for is the way USM was viewed when I came out of HS about 10 years ago. I grew up in the southern part of the state, and attended a few summer camps and honors-type events at USM over the years. By middle school I was in the metro area for good, but by the time I graduated, the general consensus of our class (and not just me) was:
1) The only USM programs that I and my peers ever heard held in higher regard than* equivalents at OM and MSU were music education and seems like I remember something to do with polymers/chemistry (?)
2) Counting a 2 on any AP tests is awful. NO ONE does this. By 2004, the school was also put on SACS probation, which is inexcusable, academically speaking. There was also some kind of enrollment figures scandal, if I'm remembering correctly, though I may have the timeline off there. Adding these things up, their integrity as an institution was viewed in a pretty negative light for several years among my class and a few following.
3) Perhaps just due to resources, they didn't recruit the metro area very hard, which probably hurt their perception state-wide among graduating HS students. In fact, they were viewed as catering to coasties (opening some campuses on the coast, I think), not that there's anything wrong with that. But State and Ole Miss would bend over backwards for metro-area kids, but you'd never even get the first mass mailed postcard from USM.
Again, this was just the perception, and I'm not saying Southern isn't a fine school. Granted, there was no way in hell I was going there for computer science, but when I saw Halpert's post, I pretty much agreed with it, even if the Black Bear in him couldn't help but put it in some elitist terms.