While I would love to believe that Milton McGregor funneled money to the Newtons, and while I have been pre-disposed to believe it, something in the story makes me think there's nothing there, at least as specifically regards a direct link. Here's why: the article quotes his lawyer emphatically saying that his client did not have any contact with the Newtons or anyone else on their behalf. Before you say, "No ****, what do you expect the lawyer to say?", understand this: in the federal system that sort of statement in the press, while the case is pending, could be seen as a failure to accept responsibility (in the event it is considered relevant conduct and connected to the actual charges) and could end up costing the client several additional years. Now, if McGregor never, ever intends to plead guilty its no big deal. But in the federal system over 90 per cent of all cases plead. (Of those that don't, the fed gov't has a conviction rate that would rival any t.v. prosecutor). Hate to say it, but I think McGregor's lawyer is convinced there's nothing there; I don' t think he has made any such statements regarding the actual indictment against his client. In other words, its lawyer-speak for "He's guilty as charged, but not for this other ****."<div>
</div><div>It is entirely possible that the bagman is several steps removed from McGregor and that the lawyer's statement is therefore technically correct....if not entirely "true". </div>
</div><div>It is entirely possible that the bagman is several steps removed from McGregor and that the lawyer's statement is therefore technically correct....if not entirely "true". </div>