Well, it's simple. The sky isn't falling. This is a pretty good roster on paper, good enough to be on most top 10 preseason lists. *note: roster is probably 90-100%% set, but you never know what could happen (late additions/subtractions).
Is the roster a 100% Grand Slam, mark us down for the final 4? No. It's not 1996 or the 2015 roster.
Concern#1
Chemistry. This will be the norm in the new era. However, as you can see with some portal selections, Pope and staff are trying to build some continuity by landing some players with eligibility left after this season.
Concern#2
Shooting. we only have 1 higher volume shooter that shot an above average percentage.
Concern#3
Best player on the floor? In high level games, we may not have the best player on the floor. Elite first or second team all american talent that makes the game easier for everyone. JQ on the defensive side is probably the closest we have to this. An even more improved Oweh is close though.
These are the ones that jump to my mind. I'm sure we can find others but this roster has more strengths (on paper) than concerns. The SEC doesn't look like it's going to be nearly as strong either. Also, it doesn't look like anyone has put together a SUPER team on paper (yet).
The main complaint I have about last season was the team wasn't playing it's best basketball in March. Yes, injuries contributed to that, but they weren't playing crisp, error free basketball late. I was disappointed that the team didn't step up their play, intensity, and focus in March. I still think Pope did a good job overall, but I want to see March magic. Even if you're outgunned, you still play well and make a game out of it. The UT loss was a let down because the team never made a run and played poorly. Only time will tell if Pope can make the leap from good to a great coach.