I know its bleacher report- but at least the topic is interesting
http://bleacherreport.com...very-bcs-program/page/34
http://bleacherreport.com...very-bcs-program/page/34
It's interesting to contrast how each started:maroonmania said:Felker or Croom? In comparing Felker (21-34) and Croom (21-38) I would say that Croom was slightly worse. Croom had the worst offensive schemes and execution I think I have ever seen at MSU. If Felker had been able to get an Ellis Johnson quality assistant on his staff as DC like Croom did then I think Felker would have done significantly better than Croom.
That isn't a popular point of view here, but it is absolutely correct.shotgunDawg said:I know you guys knock on Croom a lot, and if you want to say that his record, final Ole Miss game, offense, stubbornness, offensive coordinator, and quarterbacks sucked then you are correct. However, I would argue that <span style="font-weight: bold;">the program Dan Mullen took over as head coach was far better from an attitude, academic, and work ethic standpoint than the program that Croom took over.</span> Croom was not a good coach, but I will give him credit in the sense that he left the job better than he found it, however small of a margin that may be. I do believe that the foundation that Croom help lay has helped Mullen to some degree.
BulldogBlitz said:i started in 1988. the first football game i went to was a win... it was in a torrential downpour (not blaming felker for the rain)... but it was our only win on the year.
we played tennessee in starkville his last year....and i seem to recall the game plan went something like this....
up middle.
dive left.
dive right.
punt.
we completed zero passes in the first half. we attempted zero passes. no exaggeration... i don't know what the plan was with that... run out the time and *hope* T would fumble in their own endzone multiple times?