Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="3xWVUenginEER" data-source="post: 131470920" data-attributes="member: 1476506">Good question.IMO. My guess is in a heartbeat for Oklahoma (Natural Historic RIVALRY), Oklahoma State, K State, Iowa State, and the basketball school from the Old Big 8. I didn’t forget Kansas but they don’t need another *** kicking from the past but they would take Nebraska just to have 1 full house in football a season every 2 years. For WVU, I think it would be a yes. Add that &amp; it gets you to 6.Now as for the state of Texas:&nbsp; Texas would probably be a no.&nbsp; TX tech????&nbsp; Baylor??????, TCU?????I think it’s a 75% vote for Big XII expansion and approval.&nbsp; You need 2 yes votes&nbsp; in Texas.&nbsp; And here’s the thing the Big&nbsp; XII needs 2 to get to 12.&nbsp; 11 doesn’t do&nbsp; much except mean a 10 game conference schedule meaning only 2 ooc&nbsp; games.As for Nebraska, they make more in the B1G than Big XII so despite their disdain for a conference where they’re treated like a Lepper or the bastard son &amp; 2nd class there next to Ohio State, Meat Chicken, and Wisky and even Sandusky State (that has to drive them nuts), they’ll bite their tongue til their ego says we’re out of here.The thing with Nebraska is they could jump to probably anywhere but every conference has a pecking order.&nbsp; In the SEC, if you ain’t got a ring or 2 in the last 15 years, about 4 schools can say STFU and cash your check,&nbsp; In the B1G, I have to believe it is Ohio State and Meat Chicken are arguing and calling the Shots.In the Big XII , I’d say Texas brass would say at the first meeting “Oh you’re back, we hadn’t heard anything about you while you been away.”&nbsp; Oklahoma could cough and say “Well Texas nobody has heard anything from you and you didn’t even leave.”&nbsp; Then there’s the LHN till espn finally admits “we paid how much for this $#!+ for a school who has been no better in most years than the 3rd best school in TX.“</blockquote>

[QUOTE="3xWVUenginEER, post: 131470920, member: 1476506"] Good question. IMO. My guess is in a heartbeat for Oklahoma (Natural Historic RIVALRY), Oklahoma State, K State, Iowa State, and the basketball school from the Old Big 8. I didn’t forget Kansas but they don’t need another *** kicking from the past but they would take Nebraska just to have 1 full house in football a season every 2 years. For WVU, I think it would be a yes. Add that & it gets you to 6. Now as for the state of Texas: Texas would probably be a no. TX tech???? Baylor??????, TCU????? I think it’s a 75% vote for Big XII expansion and approval. You need 2 yes votes in Texas. And here’s the thing the Big XII needs 2 to get to 12. 11 doesn’t do much except mean a 10 game conference schedule meaning only 2 ooc games. As for Nebraska, they make more in the B1G than Big XII so despite their disdain for a conference where they’re treated like a Lepper or the bastard son & 2nd class there next to Ohio State, Meat Chicken, and Wisky and even Sandusky State (that has to drive them nuts), they’ll bite their tongue til their ego says we’re out of here. The thing with Nebraska is they could jump to probably anywhere but every conference has a pecking order. In the SEC, if you ain’t got a ring or 2 in the last 15 years, about 4 schools can say STFU and cash your check, In the B1G, I have to believe it is Ohio State and Meat Chicken are arguing and calling the Shots. In the Big XII , I’d say Texas brass would say at the first meeting “Oh you’re back, we hadn’t heard anything about you while you been away.” Oklahoma could cough and say “Well Texas nobody has heard anything from you and you didn’t even leave.” Then there’s the LHN till espn finally admits “we paid how much for this $#!+ for a school who has been no better in most years than the 3rd best school in TX.“ [/QUOTE]

Name