Put me down as a yes. We would win most of the games and that has to help us in recruiting. Nothing hurts pitt fans more than losing to us.Thoughts on if the series should be played and if so, how often?
I think it helps WVU to have a game that is with a traditional rival and one that the fans can easily travel to. With that said though I don't see a huge advantage in playing them over a VT, PSU, etc.Thoughts on if the series should be played and if so, how often?
I think it helps WVU to have a game that is with a traditional rival and one that the fans can easily travel to. With that said though I don't see a huge advantage in playing them over a VT, PSU, etc.
This right here. Word for word! Couldn't have said it better myself.Only if it's advantageous to the Mountaineers to do so........ guess I'll take to the grave and beyond that PITT, and Syracuse, sneaked out the backdoor to join the ACC with absolutely no consideration for the impact and consequences such a move would have on West Virginia University.
So as far as I'm concerned......... :flushed::gun: to both of 'em. [smoke]
Thoughts on if the series should be played and if so, how often?
Only if it's advantageous to the Mountaineers to do so........ guess I'll take to the grave and beyond that PITT, and Syracuse, sneaked out the backdoor to join the ACC with absolutely no consideration for the impact and consequences such a move would have on West Virginia University.
So as far as I'm concerned......... :flushed::gun: to both of 'em. [smoke]
Come on, it was 1000% obvious to everyone on this board that we were leaving. You don't think that Peterson had that figured out? There was nothing underhanded about it, the just got the bid before we did because we were focused on the SECYou can't blame them for the failure. But you can blame them for the backstabbing way they carried it out. The Big East was doomed the minute Miami left. Professing their loyalty and actually talking WVU into holding off any further conference flirting then as soon as the ripples stopped they jumped ship leaving the teams to fend for themselves. No different than the way RR went to Michigan. If he had been open and told everyone "Hey it's a once in a lifetime chance to coach at this level, I have to take it." he would not incur near the bitterness and hatred he does from half of the WVU fan base.
I hate Pitt but you cannot blame them for the break up of the Big Least. You can't blame WVU either, but we deserve our fair share of the blame as well. Make no mistake, long before sPitt left, we were telecasting to the world that we were leaving. We were openly marketing the SEC and many on here, including myself, thought we would land there. Did you really expect the rest of the league watch is putting on make up and flirting with anyone who would pay attention and not try to get theirs too?
The big least failed because of incredibly poor leadership...that and a bunch of deadbeat catholic basketball schools.
Like I said, I F'in hate Pitt, but you can't lay this on them.
Maybe be because you are a freaking dumbass! Read your own posts dumb ****!I have absolutely no idea why you quoted my post and then started talking about the Big East break-up........ [smoke]
Maybe be because you are a freaking dumbass! Read your own posts dumb ****!
Only if it's advantageous to the Mountaineers to do so........ guess I'll take to the grave and beyond that PITT, and Syracuse, sneaked out the backdoor to join the ACC with absolutely no consideration for the impact and consequences such a move would have on West Virginia University.
So as far as I'm concerned......... :flushed::gun: to both of 'em. [smoke]
Painted....you are so lucky this forum has Doom....
...or you'd be 'that guy'.
1. Dumb ***, I highlighted nothing...only replied to your post (good lord, are you this stupid?)Well, maybe I am, hell, you might be right..... but tell you what, let's read it together and see if we can find "a freaking dumbass" or a "dumb ****" in there somewhere . I've quoted my post, highlighted it and attached it above so you can see it and we can read it together.
O.K........ Ready, set, go....... Huh, what do you know? I don't see the "Big Least", as you put it, or the Big East mentioned, implied or alluded to anywhere in my post....... but I now do understand who the "dumbass" and "dumb ****" is in this little exchange. [smoke]
1. Dumb ***, I highlighted nothing...only replied to your post (good lord, are you this stupid?)
2. you said, and I quote "guess I'll take to the grave and beyond that PITT, and Syracuse, sneaked out the backdoor to join the ACC with absolutely no consideration for the impact and consequences such a move would have on West Virginia University"
what do you think you are referring too here? HMMM? them leaving the Big East? Good lord...
3. stop making me defend Pitt...I don't enjoy it.
Done now?
Would love to see them back on the schedule. As others have mentioned we're going to win the majority of the games and the Pittsburgh area kids will see who has the superior program.Thoughts on if the series should be played and if so, how often?
Thoughts on if the series should be played and if so, how often?
Are you kidding me? Who wants a Nationaly Televised game over a Thankgiving weekend that pays boatloads of cash with National interest and a century of history when you got Iowa State on Saturday at noon instead?
That would be perfect.How about a clockwise rotation -- home-and-home with The Pitt, Penn State, Maryland, Virginia, VPI, Kentucky and Ohio State? Repeat in 12 years.
Don't look now but Pitt is a P5 bottom feeder & last time I checked Maryland stuck around longer than Pitt, so much of your reasoning makes no sense to me.I'd much rather resume a century+ rivalry than play Maryland, which opts out when it has a better offer anyway.
I like that we have Penn State and Virginia Tech coming up down the road, too. But I would trade Maryland for Pitt as an every-year game.
Either one plus plus the string of other teams lined up makes for two good OOC games.
With 9 Big 12 games, that only leaves the one payday game for the Georgia Southerns of the world. And I'd like to change that to a Power-5 team low in its conference standings, such as Indiana or Vanderbilt or Kentucky or Syracuse or Virginia or Purdue or Colorado or Washington State -- only one per year, of course, but that's 8 to choose from off the top of my head.
It still would be a WVU victory, but over a Power-5 bottom-feeder instead of a non-Power 5 lower classification team. It would mean more.
I mean, if every WVU game were against Power 5 teams, that would help come national playoff selection time, IF WVU can do better than 7-6.