The game pissed me off and I was very disappointed vs how I felt after the OSU game- but my reaction was to the so many over-reactions.stop, you are far more aware to just see 22 pts
stop being disingenuous
The game pissed me off and I was very disappointed vs how I felt after the OSU game- but my reaction was to the so many over-reactions.stop, you are far more aware to just see 22 pts
stop being disingenuous
6 wins and a bowl is a success. That being said we need an honest evaluation of where we are weak and we need to fix those issues. It’s up to schiano to convince the wealthy and businesses that portal money is a good investment. We had the highest rated 12pm on cbs in like 15 years. Go monetize that
At least they will get to mix up the schedule. Losing to Ohio state every year gets oldTo me it's a successful season because it's a huge improvement over last season. But I suspect the following seasons won't be very significantly better.
if you expected a bowl bid this year before the season started, you're right.If the final record is 6-7, not a success. 7 wins, any way they come, is a success to me.
I don't agree. If a fan of a fictional team expects a zero or one win team, and their team wins two, it doesn't make it a success. My expectations have nothing to do with the success of this team. By any rational measure, a season isn't a success if you lose more games than you win.if you expected a bowl bid this year before the season started, you're right.
If you felt pre season RU wouldn't be good enough to get an invite, RU did better than you thought and the bowl loss shouldn't make the 2023 season unsuccessful.
Or, admit that people on a message board know nothing in the preseason and their expectations are largely baseless. Then ask the coaches and players if it was a success.Well, than your answer is easy. Just look at the record and take nothing else into account.
so bowl games mean nothing and going to one and losing makes for a bad season.I don't agree. If a fan of a fictional team expects a zero or one win team, and their team wins two, it doesn't make it a success. My expectations have nothing to do with the success of this team. By any rational measure, a season isn't a success if you lose more games than you win.
I understand your point of view and I'm not trying to be negative. I'm just a little tougher. Bowls are watered down, and I think you should have to be above, not at, .500 to be eligible. Bowl eligibility is arbitrarily set by the huge number of bowls now in existence.so bowl games mean nothing and going to one and losing makes for a bad season.
I don't agree, but can understand someone feeling a season with one more loss than wins makes for a bad season even if the team qualified for a bowl game.
Winning six and qualifying for a bowl, then losing that bowl game is a heck of a lot different than a one win team winning 2 games the next year.
I feel when a team has been losing for years and not eligible for bowl game invites because of those losing seasons and becomes eligible to play in a bowl game. that makes for a successful season at least for that year
Of course after awhile just making a minor bowl and even winning it won't be enough to say the season was a successful one.
But Rutgers football hasn't reached that point> YET
OK, it's your opinion. Feel free to ask them.Or, admit that people on a message board know nothing in the preseason and their expectations are largely baseless. Then ask the coaches and players if it was a success.
I can equate it to sales- If I have one sales person crushing it at 300+% of quota and another one struggling to hit 50%. And instead of firing the 2nd sales person, I decide I see something and want to work with them.I understand your point of view and I'm not trying to be negative. I'm just a little tougher. Bowls are watered down, and I think you should have to be above, not at, .500 to be eligible. Bowl eligibility is arbitrarily set by the huge number of bowls now in existence.