NFL Draft
2018–2022 NFL Draft by Stars
Recruiting class to draft outcomes across the 2018–2022 NFL drafts.
Total Drafted
1,283
2018–2022 drafts
5-Star
99
7.7% of draftees
4-Star
412
32.1% of draftees
3-Star
607
47.3% of draftees
01 · ELITE TIER
5-Star Recruits
63.1%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
99
Recruited
157
% of Draftees
7.7%
% of Recruits
0.6%
10.4×more likely to be drafted
02 · BLUE CHIP
4-Star Recruits
22.7%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
412
Recruited
1,815
% of Draftees
32.1%
% of Recruits
2.4%
3.8×more likely to be drafted
03 · PROSPECT
3-Star Recruits
6.0%DRAFTRATE
Drafted
607
Recruited
10,040
% of Draftees
47.3%
% of Recruits
3.5%
Baselinecomparison tier
Draft Talent · By State
Sorted by Draft Talent Ratio — blue chip share ÷ population share
| # | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Louisiana | 4 | 23 | 24 | 56 | 5.3% | 1% | 376% |
| 02 | Mississippi | 4 | 10 | 17 | 34 | 2.7% | <1% | 305% |
| 03 | Alabama | 6 | 16 | 21 | 48 | 4.3% | 2% | 285% |
| 04 | Georgia | 15 | 28 | 45 | 98 | 8.4% | 3% | 260% |
| 05 | Florida | 14 | 51 | 69 | 144 | 12.7% | 7% | 195% |
| 06 | Tennessee | 4 | 13 | 10 | 32 | 3.3% | 2% | 159% |
| 07 | Maryland | 1 | 13 | 14 | 32 | 2.7% | 2% | 148% |
| 08 | North Carolina | 3 | 20 | 17 | 50 | 4.5% | 3% | 142% |
| 09 | Texas | 11 | 52 | 84 | 154 | 12.3% | 9% | 139% |
| 10 | Virginia | 4 | 13 | 18 | 41 | 3.3% | 3% | 128% |
| 11 | Arkansas | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 1.0% | <1% | 107% |
| 12 | Ohio | 1 | 18 | 23 | 49 | 3.7% | 4% | 104% |
| 13 | South Carolina | 2 | 6 | 10 | 23 | 1.6% | 2% | 100% |
| 14 | Utah | 0 | 5 | 7 | 19 | 1.0% | <1% | 99% |
| 15 | District Of Columbia | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0.2% | <1% | 94% |
| 16 | New Jersey | 2 | 11 | 16 | 31 | 2.5% | 3% | 92% |
| 17 | Kansas | 0 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 0.8% | <1% | 88% |
| 18 | Pennsylvania | 1 | 16 | 19 | 41 | 3.3% | 4% | 85% |
| 19 | Oklahoma | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 1.0% | 1% | 81% |
| 20 | California | 12 | 36 | 49 | 115 | 9.4% | 12% | 79% |
| 21 | Missouri | 0 | 7 | 8 | 21 | 1.4% | 2% | 74% |
| 22 | South Dakota | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0.2% | <1% | 73% |
| 23 | Kentucky | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 1.0% | 1% | 72% |
| 24 | Indiana | 0 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 1.4% | 2% | 67% |
| 25 | Michigan | 1 | 9 | 16 | 32 | 2.0% | 3% | 64% |
| 26 | Oregon | 0 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 0.8% | 1% | 61% |
| 27 | Rhode Island | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% | <1% | 60% |
| 28 | Arizona | 2 | 4 | 7 | 15 | 1.2% | 2% | 54% |
| 29 | Illinois | 2 | 7 | 17 | 28 | 1.8% | 4% | 46% |
| 30 | Minnesota | 0 | 4 | 6 | 17 | 0.8% | 2% | 46% |
| 31 | Hawaii | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.2% | <1% | 45% |
| 32 | Nevada | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 0.4% | <1% | 42% |
| 33 | Iowa | 0 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 0.4% | <1% | 41% |
| 34 | Connecticut | 1 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 0.4% | 1% | 36% |
| 35 | Idaho | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0.2% | <1% | 35% |
| 36 | Washington | 1 | 3 | 11 | 16 | 0.8% | 2% | 34% |
| 37 | Nebraska | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.2% | <1% | 33% |
| 38 | Wisconsin | 0 | 3 | 10 | 17 | 0.6% | 2% | 33% |
| 39 | New Mexico | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.2% | <1% | 31% |
| 40 | Colorado | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0.4% | 2% | 22% |
| 41 | Massachusetts | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 0.4% | 2% | 19% |
| 42 | New York | 1 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 0.4% | 6% | 7% |
| 43 | Alaska | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 44 | Delaware | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 45 | Maine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 46 | Montana | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 47 | New Hampshire | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 48 | North Dakota | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 49 | Vermont | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 50 | West Virginia | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |
| 51 | Wyoming | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0.0% | <1% | 0% |