9 deaths on community college campus in Oregon

CatsFanGG24

New member
Dec 22, 2003
22,267
2,938
0
Where has this been confirmed? There wasn't much to the Christian angle in the reports I saw other than a few sound bites from one of the victims fathers. Was this kind of detail confirmed and reported?
Multiple witnesses have said so - so far.
 

DaBossIsBack

New member
Jun 28, 2013
3,359
1,917
0
It's not dumb at all. People self inflict by drugs. If people were turning drugs into weapons, you may have a point.

I'm thinking Marshall Applewhite and Jim Jones, BUT, yet the people in those mass deaths CHOSE to take the death.
Not the children at Jonestown. The kool aid was squirted into their mouths. Also Jim Jones would have these staged fake suicides that he called "white nights". If you chose not to drink they would force you. A lot of the people probably thought it was another staged event by their crazy paranoid leader. Still your point stands haha
 
  • Like
Reactions: UKserialkiller

CatDaddy4daWin

New member
Dec 11, 2013
6,147
1,577
0
Go to the streets & tell Americans if you have your way they no longer can own guns, can no longer buy guns....that the 2nd amendment is going to be repealed by politicians who are gonna run on that issue & try to win elections.
Guess what? No one is saying repeal the 2nd amendment, not even close to that. Just like the first amendment, isn't all encompassing without restraint. GTFO with your NRA lobby induced bull. Cling to those guns man, we're coming to take them away [roll]
 
  • Like
Reactions: fuzz77

CatsFanGG24

New member
Dec 22, 2003
22,267
2,938
0
Increase background checks and mental health evaluations, decrease gun free zones...see which sides can compromise.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,048
3,188
0
No law will ever keep anyone 100% safe.
Talk about strawmen... you use a line of logic to justify your position but then reject that same line of logic when applied in other instances.
Nobody is ever 100% safe. Is that the standard that must be met to justify doing something?
We have speeding laws but people still speed...does that mean that laws against speeding are useless?
How about instead of adding regulation we replace current regulation with regulations that fill gaps and loopholes found in previous regulations.
Joker Phillips failed as a head coach so UK replaced him with someone who hopefully does the job better. Wow! What a concept!

Youre making a totally different argument. Your example assumes there are no laws/restrictions. There are. Noone is saying "we want no regulations". There already exist pretty stringent regulations. We're saying that wont help.

In fact, Oregon recently passed more stringent restrictions. Didnt help. Youre effectively arguing "to combat speeding, we need to lower the speed limit from 65 to 45. That'll stop em!" It doesnt make sense. No matter how many actors and public figures tell you otherwise, criminals dont obey laws. So more laws solve nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacerX.ksr

JohnBlue

New member
Jul 22, 2003
188,376
3,180
0
The sad reality of this is that him and most others are not hard to spot. He wasn't shy about telling people what he was going to do.
 

DaBossIsBack

New member
Jun 28, 2013
3,359
1,917
0
How about we just go back to muskets?
Confiscate everyone's guns and only sell muskets. Problem solved. Try committing mass murder with one of these babies.
 

CatsFanGG24

New member
Dec 22, 2003
22,267
2,938
0
that's awful. Any report of how many shots fired/how accurate he was?
No, but it seems that he had the victims isolated in a room...stood them up individually and shot them. I'd say he hit everything he wanted to until cops arrived.

Neighbors also said this dude enjoyed target practice...so he was familiar with shooting
 

BlueRaider22

New member
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
1,858
0
How about we just go back to muskets?
Confiscate everyone's guns and only sell muskets. Problem solved. Try committing mass murder with one of these babies.


They wouldn't. They would dump rat poison in the school cafeteria spaghetti sauce......kill 300 kids in an instant. Or they'd pick up the bottle of Drano from the hall bath at home and make a pipe bomb.....blow up a school bus, killing 50.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacerX.ksr

mdlUK.1

New member
Dec 23, 2002
29,712
3,216
0
They said he had 13 guns, 6 with at the school. ALL obtained legally but not all by him. They didn't specify which.
 

JHB4UK

New member
May 29, 2001
31,836
2,637
0
Cling to those guns man, we're coming to take them away [roll]
pay attention & read better next time. already said you & your ilk havent the nuts in your empty sack to actually come out & say what you want to do. haven't before, won't after this act of evil either. keyboard cowards, especially the guy who reads from teleprompters, gutless to actually try and do what you think will stop this.

now scurry back to twitter and post more bogus school or mass shooting event stats to make yourself feel like you are doing something about it!
 

VT/UK Rondo

New member
Aug 2, 2009
7,563
300
0
The world has gone to ****. Gimme the good ol days when all we had was people tampering with tylonol bottles, child abductions, serial killers eating folks, blood and crip battles and pitbull attacks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big_Blue79

mashburned

New member
Mar 10, 2009
40,283
18,584
0
They just announced that he had no history of mental health issues. Guns obtained legally.

What what laws would you pass that would have prevented this?

That's interesting because I read this morning that he graduated in a class of 5 students from a school for emotionally disabled kids.

Of course, that could be totally false.
 
Apr 13, 2002
44,048
3,188
0
They just announced that he had no history of mental health issues. Guns obtained legally.

What what laws would you pass that would have prevented this?

There arent any. Which is why all these anti gun advocates have to get their tweets and posts in while they can, before the facts come out.

Its also why its ridiculously irresponsible/inappropriate for Obama to make comments he makes after these events.
 

fuzz77

New member
Sep 19, 2012
12,163
629
0
Youre making a totally different argument. Your example assumes there are no laws/restrictions. There are. Noone is saying "we want no regulations". There already exist pretty stringent regulations. We're saying that wont help.

In fact, Oregon recently passed more stringent restrictions. Didnt help. Youre effectively arguing "to combat speeding, we need to lower the speed limit from 65 to 45. That'll stop em!" It doesnt make sense. No matter how many actors and public figures tell you otherwise, criminals dont obey laws. So more laws solve nothing.
If regulations don't help, why have any?

Regulations work when the proper authority, ability to enforce and penalties for violating them are put in place. The technology exists that could monitor automobile speeds and automatically send a citation if violated. People know that they can drive 80 on the interstate and drive right by a radar trap and it is unlikely that they will be cited. If random speed traps existed on the roads and you knew that 1 mph over the limit resulted in a speeding ticket 50+% of the time, people would drive the speed limit or slower. The problem with current background checks is that the emphasis is that they be done quickly as to not inconvenience anyone. How about emphasizing that they be done thouroughly so they're done right?
 

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
132,592
26,415
0
Fuzz sounds like the kind of guy that could go to a school and shoot a bunch of people just to help his mission to rid the world of guns. I don't think he would have a problem rationalizing in his mind that the deaths would be for the greater good. He could probably pass all the tests and appear on paper as harmless.

Could very well have been the motive of this latest nut.
 

BlueRaider22

New member
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
1,858
0
^That's it. All of these shootings are staged by the anti-firearm population to push through their agendas.

Ever seen Wag The Dog?
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacerX.ksr

UKserialkiller

New member
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
35,841
0
Fuzz sounds like the kind of guy that could go to a school and shoot a bunch of people just to help his mission to rid the world of guns. I don't think he would have a problem rationalizing in his mind that the deaths would be for the greater good. He could probably pass all the tests and appear on paper as harmless.

Could very well have been the motive of this latest nut.


Fuzz shoots up a mall to make a point

Fuzz: "see, I told you guns were bad"
 
Oct 16, 2002
8,854
610
0
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” John Adams

People are slowly devaluing life, believing morality is gray, believing less in a God that created them, believing less in an afterlife, and having less hope in this life. Is it any wonder people are becoming more mentally ill? The answer? Turn over more control to the government to take care of us. From history, we know how well that usually turns out.....
 

LineSkiCat14

Well-known member
Aug 5, 2015
37,265
4,309
113
Spoke to my father on this stuff the other day in passing. His explanation was similar, and it made a great deal of sense. "There's no religion anymore!"

*Shakes fist at sky like the crotchety old man he is*

But it's a great point. His age, growing up, you were accountable to a greater being. There were repercussions for your actions. "Be a good person, or you spend eternity with your creepy uncle Bob surrounded by fire and demons". Set aside the religion debate, or which one is the correct religion...I'm not going into the argument of science vs religion. That's not important. But religion does keep society in check. Life is valuable, there are rules. It's no shock to anyone that America has lost it's religion in the last few decades.

Maybe the loss of religion religion shares similarities to this age of entitlement
 

DSmith21

New member
Mar 27, 2012
8,297
2,036
0
They just announced that he had no history of mental health issues. Guns obtained legally.

What what laws would you pass that would have prevented this?

This sounds like mental health issues to me.

"Records indicate he graduated in 2009 from a high school catering to troubled and special-needs students. Multiple media sources reported Friday he left behind an angry note that is now in the hands of investigators.

The Los Angeles Times said Harper-Mercer's note was several pages long and talked about his anger and depression.

Harper-Mercer graduated from The Switzer Center in 2009, according to a graduation listing in The Daily Breeze newspaper. Switzer Center is a private, nonprofit school in Torrance, California, geared for special education students with a range of issues from learning disabilities, health problems and autism or Asperger's Disorder, according to the school's website."....

There are a number of indications that Harper-Mercer had mental health or behavioral issues. His screen name on some social media sites was "lithium love." Lithium is used as a psychiatric medication....

A neighbor told The New York Times that Harper-Mercer's mother had told a neighbor, "My son is dealing with some mental issues," and was intolerant of roaches that had infested the building.

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-n...f/2015/10/new_details_emerge_on_umpqua_c.html
 
Last edited:

kentucky_wildcat_#1

New member
Aug 23, 2003
33,780
734
0
It's kobvious why this keeps happening. Look at the news coverage every time a shooting takes place. Look at this forum for example. A internet forum in KY with 5+ threads talking about a shooting in Oregon? These people want to die and before they do, they want their 15 minutes of fame. Why? Who knows. Some people are just screwed up in the head and all the studying them in the world won't tell you why that person in this way. The news has to stop making these guys famous by reporting on it non stop.
 

mdlUK.1

New member
Dec 23, 2002
29,712
3,216
0
This sounds like mental health issues to me.

"Records indicate he graduated in 2009 from a high school catering to troubled and special-needs students. Multiple media sources reported Friday he left behind an angry note that is now in the hands of investigators.

The Los Angeles Times said Harper-Mercer's note was several pages long and talked about his anger and depression.

Harper-Mercer graduated from The Switzer Center in 2009, according to a graduation listing in The Daily Breeze newspaper. Switzer Center is a private, nonprofit school in Torrance, California, geared for special education students with a range of issues from learning disabilities, health problems and autism or Asperger's Disorder, according to the school's website."....

There are a number of indications that Harper-Mercer had mental health or behavioral issues. His screen name on some social media sites was "lithium love." Lithium is used as a psychiatric medication....

A neighbor told The New York Times that Harper-Mercer's mother had told a neighbor, "My son is dealing with some mental issues," and was intolerant of roaches that had infested the building.

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-n...f/2015/10/new_details_emerge_on_umpqua_c.html
Well, I'm assuming they (the media that reported no mental health issues) meant that he had never been involuntarily hospitalized for mental issues. Nothing you highlighted would be enough to keep someone from legally obtaining a gun.

Are you saying that anyone the graduated from a school for troubled youths should be banned from ever owning a gun? Or that his Mother said he was "dealing with mental issues"? What were they?

The letter he left talking about anger and depression are after the fact. No one knew about that until it was too late.

Because he used a weird screen name, that indicates mental illness. Better check out quite a few folks on here then.

Basically, everything you listed might be enough to watch him closely. Putting aside the note he left, are the other issues enough for you to have him denied his right to own a gun? Or perhaps to take him off the street?
 

DSmith21

New member
Mar 27, 2012
8,297
2,036
0
Well, I'm assuming they (the media that reported no mental health issues) meant that he had never been involuntarily hospitalized for mental issues. Nothing you highlighted would be enough to keep someone from legally obtaining a gun.

Are you saying that anyone the graduated from a school for troubled youths should be banned from ever owning a gun? Or that his Mother said he was "dealing with mental issues"? What were they?

The letter he left talking about anger and depression are after the fact. No one knew about that until it was too late.

Because he used a weird screen name, that indicates mental illness. Better check out quite a few folks on here then.

Basically, everything you listed might be enough to watch him closely. Putting aside the note he left, are the other issues enough for you to have him denied his right to own a gun? Or perhaps to take him off the street?

The guy was clearly nuts. I would be for gun owners having to pass an exam before some type of mental health board. The NRA actually supports this too. It is the democrats in congress who won't go for it because of privacy concerns.
 

mdlUK.1

New member
Dec 23, 2002
29,712
3,216
0
Does the NRA want all gun owners to go before a mental health board? I can't believe that. They DO support all mental health issues being checked during the background check but I'm not sure that would have caught this guy since he has never been involuntarily hospitalized.
 

KingOfBBN

New member
Sep 14, 2013
39,077
3,295
0
Does the NRA want all gun owners to go before a mental health board? I can't believe that. They DO support all mental health issues being checked during the background check but I'm not sure that would have caught this guy since he has never been involuntarily hospitalized.

Exactly, which is why there is nothing that will solve this issue. How the hell are you supposed to find out someone's crazy before they do something crazy? There's a ton of people that can disguise their issues.
 

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,050
4,559
113
Guess what? No one is saying repeal the 2nd amendment, not even close to that. Just like the first amendment, isn't all encompassing without restraint. GTFO with your NRA lobby induced bull. Cling to those guns man, we're coming to take them away [roll]
Its starts with more laws and more restrictions. Get your foot in the door and then move to the next level. Heck, even some people on here did not realize that we (U.S.) already have a ban on assault weapons and have had so for years. We do not need more laws, we need to enforce the ones already on the books and make the crime fit the punishment. When you have people making excuses such as "society made them do it" or he/she was abused as a child or (insert any here), you tend to take responsibility away from the person actually committing the crimes. Not saying that is the case here but we see it a lot in todays world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacerX.ksr

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,050
4,559
113
[
Fuzz sounds like the kind of guy that could go to a school and shoot a bunch of people just to help his mission to rid the world of guns. I don't think he would have a problem rationalizing in his mind that the deaths would be for the greater good. He could probably pass all the tests and appear on paper as harmless.

Could very well have been the motive of this latest nut.
He also sounds like a guy who wants to implement laws for everything more like a Gestapo kind of rule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RacerX.ksr

warrior-cat

Well-known member
Oct 22, 2004
190,050
4,559
113
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” John Adams

People are slowly devaluing life, believing morality is gray, believing less in a God that created them, believing less in an afterlife, and having less hope in this life. Is it any wonder people are becoming more mentally ill? The answer? Turn over more control to the government to take care of us. From history, we know how well that usually turns out.....
I would like this a thousand times if I thought it would sink in and the site would let me do it.
 

DaBossIsBack

New member
Jun 28, 2013
3,359
1,917
0
Its starts with more laws and more restrictions. Get your foot in the door and then move to the next level. Heck, even some people on here did not realize that we (U.S.) already have a ban on assault weapons and have had so for years. We do not need more laws, we need to enforce the ones already on the books and make the crime fit the punishment. When you have people making excuses such as "society made them do it" or he/she was abused as a child or (insert any here), you tend to take responsibility away from the person actually committing the crimes. Not saying that is the case here but we see it a lot in todays world.
They learned their recent parenting skills from the government. Too many people telling you what you can or cannot do with your children imo. Discipline is out the window.
Some one else also pointed out that it was also not on the scale it is today so, it is different. We must acknowledge this or nothing will change. Also, it was posted by someone else that these types of shootings have tripled since 2011. Don't know if true but, if it is, it says a lot about our current leadership.
 

RacerX.ksr

New member
Sep 17, 2004
132,592
26,415
0
Out of 320,000,000 people, 166,000 are in prison for murder. That's .00052%. The murder rate has dropped in this country over time, not increased.

In 1974, 20,740 people were murdered in America. In 2014, the number was 14,249. Population increased during that span from 211 million to 318 million. The biggest change is one of perception. We have instant access to news and are inundated with it from many different sources.

Driving down the road is many times more dangerous than attending school. Some of you act like schools are the new killing fields of America. It's just not true. Cecil the lion was actually made into a bigger story than this because we now get to read the opinions of people who would rely on a 50/50 guess as to which hemisphere the USA is located in.
 

UKserialkiller

New member
Dec 13, 2009
34,297
35,841
0
Out of 320,000,000 people, 166,000 are in prison for murder. That's .00052%. The murder rate has dropped in this country over time, not increased.

In 1974, 20,740 people were murdered in America. In 2014, the number was 14,249. Population increased during that span from 211 million to 318 million. The biggest change is one of perception. We have instant access to news and are inundated with it from many different sources.

Driving down the road is many times more dangerous than attending school. Some of you act like schools are the new killing fields of America. It's just not true. Cecil the lion was actually made into a bigger story than this because we now get to read the opinions of people who would rely on a 50/50 guess as to which hemisphere the USA is located in.


Dude, you are so on the money. The homicide rate is as low as in almost 40 years.

Mean World Syndrome.

Mean world syndrome is a term coined by George Gerbner to describe a phenomenon whereby violence-related content of mass media makes viewers believe that the world is more dangerous than it actually is.Mean world syndrome is one of the main conclusions of cultivation theory.