I buy two CL tickets. Since I give a little more than the CL minimum, total cost to MSU for me is about $5K. Hotels for 7 games in Tupelo run around $1K (much higher in Starkville). And driving at 50 cents/mile is around $200/game, or $1400/year. Total is about $8K/season when food is added. I will most likely join you next year.
If I have lesser seats because those people gave more THIS year, but not the previous 10 years, I feel like that is unfair. While I will not necessarily be upset at the new process, I will refuse to participate by giving more simply to have the same or lesser seats. They need to do what they need to do to maximize revenue, but I (and probably many more) need to do what I need to do to determine if I can justify an exorbitant amount of giving to watch a .500 middling SEC school. I will be better off to keep my $1500 and buy individual tickets for games I want through Stub Hub and still come out ahead. Again, no hard feelings on my part, but I will choose not to participate.All you guys complaining about being pushed out realize you were pushed out by people giving more than you, right? How do you think the loyal fan that was giving more than you felt about being on the goal line? Just because you are older and have been able to give longer than me does not mean that my larger gift should not be rewarded. I'm in the top 1000 of the BDC and didn't start donating until 5 years ago. However, all 5 years I've had goal line seats while "loyal fans" who gave less than me had better seats. Until this reseating, I had no chance at better seats regardless of my donation. How does that encourage more donations?
Since the 80's.
Not anymore. (My seats were in the upper section prior to the reseating because my Grandpappy didn't get me seats when they built the Hump that I, and all my future legacies, would be ENTITLED
to after he left them to us.)
You can't change your entitled seats, but you can always give more. The negative is the 1%ers can't rock it like those "legacy squatters" could back in the good ole days.
~300 people paying $25000 over five years raises over 7 million dollars. I wouldn't call that "poorly thought out."Yeah, in the end the TTF initiative being an option outside of purchasing premium seating in the new section is the only really poorly thought out piece of this. I hope whatever money we got from it was worth some upset fans.
If you bought season tickets every year since the Hump opened, you've got a TON of Bulldog Club points for consecutive years season tickets bought. No way your current seats aren't as good as the ones you started out with.
clI don't now why they didn't simply take into account all time donations. Have a realistic minimum annual gift to keep each set of tickets and then do priority based on all time giving. You'll still be giving an edge to people that donate more recently, because inflation will have made their gift less costly.
I understand the way they did it gives people an incentive to up their donation now, but it should also give pause to people that intend to give early and often. I'd like to think that in another 15 years, a $25k pledge over five years will be a much smaller sacrifice for me than it would be now. Rather than build up points now with steady donations, maybe I should save my money and hope they do something similar in the future, maybe with a South EZ expansion?
If people that have been making annual giving a priortiy for a long time stop giving because other people are not only allowed to make 'catch-up' contributions but past giving is practically ignored, I can't blame them. If MSU doesn't appreciate what they've done in the past, why should they keep giving? And again, this all assumes your annual giving requirement for each ticket is high enough that people can't simply sit on tickets because they gave money in the past.
Well those weren't ever their tickets to begin with then. If they hadn't gotten dumped by their kin or company, they'd still have good seats. And if they did get dumped by their kin or company, they wouldn't have kept those seats anyway. And even without football or baseball season tickets, with 40 years worth of basketball season tickets, you've still got a shitload of Bulldog Club points. So again, ******** on your story.
cl
I agree, and the annual contribution is already there. CL this year is $1750 per seat. I wouldn't complain if they had raised that to a higher amount. Nor would I object if they reseated CL based on EXISTING members' priority ranking. And I was told on the phone that's what would happen. I do object to "newbies" booting existing CL members down to the crumbs.
Where did you get the idea I expect special privileges because I'm older than someone? Read again.
But to answer your question, it's because when I called the BDC in January to renew and upgrade my pledge, I asked the person I talked to if with the reseating, would the TTF people (I'd just found out the existence of such a thing on this board) would be able to displace existing CL ticket holders. She said no, they would not, that existing members would have priority, and would be rank ordered within CL. That sounded fair to me, but turned out to be untrue. And it turned out to be untrue AFTER I'd made my pledge and bought season tickets. Whether that would have impacted my decision to renew at the time, I can't say. But it would have been only fair to have told the truth as it turned out to be. I'm assuming the lady just did not know and made a mistake; I'd hate to think she deliberately told me an untruth.
Is that a satisfactory answer?
Where did you get the idea I expect special privileges because I'm older than someone? Read again.
But to answer your question, it's because when I called the BDC in January to renew and upgrade my pledge, I asked the person I talked to if with the reseating, would the TTF people (I'd just found out the existence of such a thing on this board) would be able to displace existing CL ticket holders. She said no, they would not, that existing members would have priority, and would be rank ordered within CL. That sounded fair to me, but turned out to be untrue. And it turned out to be untrue AFTER I'd made my pledge and bought season tickets. Whether that would have impacted my decision to renew at the time, I can't say. But it would have been only fair to have told the truth as it turned out to be. I'm assuming the lady just did not know and made a mistake; I'd hate to think she deliberately told me an untruth.
Is that a satisfactory answer?
A friend of mine's family was ranked around 125 in the Bulldog Club. They did not give to the TTF initiative which means they didn't agree to the 25K over 5 years. So those that do agree to give to TTF were able to pick before him regardless of Bulldog Club rank. He had club Level seats on the 50 but it appears when it his time to pick, he will have seats on the 20.
I don't know if there was a good way to take into account previous donations alongside those new donors that wanted to do the TTF but you could upset some longtime donors. Just interesting to see how this all plays out.
Should have gone strictly by the Builldog Club Ranking. The entire athletic department is handling this in exactly the wrong way. The TTF should have been given credit for their donation, and ranked appropriately based on that donation. No one then could argue against it. Someone posted a "What ever happened to sacrificing for the better of the university and student athlete BS". My answer that that is, the school has always given priority to lifetime giving fans. Now they are throwing them under the bus in a very backhanded way. I am almost willing to bet, that the reseating will cost the university money over the next decade.
I and many other fans have worked hard to donate extra funds just for the opportunity to move to the West Side of the Stadium. When that possibility is removed from the equation, I will stop giving extra.
May I be in your will? I loved Rick Stansbury too.
May I be in your will? I loved Rick Stansbury too.