disagree with what you say about Stans. But, you ALWAYS point out the negatives! I think you have stated your case time after time and it's mostly about criticizing him for what he hasn't done but never any praise forwhat he has done! Winning will always take care of your lack of scheduling. Sometimes you schedule thinking teams such as Rider, will be ok as for as RPI and competition, mistakes happen. Believe me, I'd like for Stans to change some things as well.
There are many coaches who are better x and o coaches better than Stans but they can't or want have as much success as he does. I do agree there is nothing wrong with wanting more or better expectations such as advancing in the Ncaa tourney, but I don't think it's the end of the world as long as we keep winning and have a chance to win every game, sell tickets and be expected to have a winning season evey year.
I just think you have backed yourself in a corner with negative talk on Stans and now you can't see the positives to what he has gotten done. Take a long look at our history, which isn't all bad but in 11 seasons going to the Ncaa's 6 times and 3 NIT's, with our scheduling isn't all bad. Do you think having a better SOS would have made a difference in the last 11 years? No it didn't, we just didn't advance in the tourney. You aren't making a good enough case with the SOS as I don't see playing better teams improving our chances to advance in the tourney. Like I said earlier, winning takes care of scheduling and going to the dance!
Lastly, I know you are thinking well with a better SOS we would be a higher seed, so what you still have to win and after the first round the next 32 teams are pretty good and the SOS pretty much evens out as you have to beat a good team anyway.