BACATOLOGY: 3/3 NCAA TOURNAMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE****RUTGERS PROJECTED 10 SEED****

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,291
168,020
113
Obviously, there is no chance of matching 2 B1G teams in the play-in game, so either one of three will be left out or one will move up to the last 11 seed. I don't the March madness has ever matched conference foes in the first round or play in ever.


they can put 4 schools there if they want
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
PSU situation is weird bc if they make the field it gives us 2 more wins against the field... unless they are making the field and taking our spot

The OSU game setting up to be potentially the biggest RU screw of all time
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,009
0
We needs to predict based on the inevitable loss Thursday . Are we getting in with the loss to Michigan ?
 

scarletrat

All-Conference
Aug 28, 2003
10,990
1,048
0
I cant see the committee putting 3 B1Gs in the first four. one of the matchups would be a rematch of sorts.

we are not beating Michigan given the fragile mental state of the team offensively. unless Michigan somehow mails it in, we need PSU and Wisconsin to both lose.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766

mugrat86

All-American
Dec 11, 2014
7,387
9,666
82
they beat Arizona and Creighton but what else

2 wins vs teams in field is a tough sell...they will draw USC in Pac 12 quarters, if they lose that one, its 0-3 vs a 10 seed

To me not close, RU has more and they both have one high end win.
2 wins against tournament likely teams should be automatically excluded from an at large bid
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,093
7,144
113
I posted on another thread that our resume deserves a 10 seed starting when we were a 5-6 seed after beating MSU at MSG on February 4 and then losing MAG in that game. We are 2-6 since then and won at Wisconsin and at Penn State , 2 bubble teams or teams barely in , we lost to Indiana and Illinois on the road by less than double digits and they are projected as a 4 and 7 seed. We lost home to Nebraska , who beat Wisconsin just before us , and beat Maryland , a 8 seed , NW a 6 seed , Iowa a7 seed and blew a 15 point halftime lead to MSU , a 6 seed . So not as terrible a loss. A loss against Michigan , out but on the bubble but have loss 3 straight OT games to teams in the field and look lik a tourney team. Minnesota a terrible loss but a game we lead wire to wire until 1/2 second left and controlled by 7-14 points most of the way.
So you can move us from 5/6 but moving us 5/6 seed lines is ridiculous. This is regardless of our not looking like a tourney team right now.
Iowa State lost 4 in a row after the Committee revealed them as a 3 seed 3 weeks ago and got blown out in some and they are still projected as a 5/6/7. So a 2-4 seed drop is reasonable. Dropping us 5-6 seeds is objectively unfair. We should be a solid 10 today v
 

goru7

All-American
Dec 12, 2005
6,093
7,144
113
On top of that we have 6 Quad 1 wins that should be considered 7 for OSU with the admitted mistake and apology ( Committee should definitely consider ) with those being at Purdue at Northwestern at Wisconsin and at Penn State , 4 road wins over teams solidly in the field or on the bubble. Ohio State would be another on road but not a team in the field.
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
I cant see the committee putting 3 B1Gs in the first four. one of the matchups would be a rematch of sorts.

we are not beating Michigan given the fragile mental state of the team offensively. unless Michigan somehow mails it in, we need PSU and Wisconsin to both lose.
If two B1G teams are the last 4 in its kind of fitting to have them play each other in the first four game

Although I'd like to see a fresh matchup
 
A

anon_0k9zlfz6lz9oy

Guest

Its simple. Beat Michigan and we’re in. Lose and we’re out
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,897
0
Our most likely path to the Big Ten Championship is Michigan, Purdue, Michigan State, Indiana.

As things stand now:

Win championship (~3% / 22-13): 6 seed
Lose in finals (~3% / 21-14): 8 seed
Lose in semis (~7% / 20-14): 10 seed
Lose in quarters (~39% / 19-14): 11 seed (Last 4 in)
Lose in 2nd rd (~48% / 18-14): Out

Today rooting for:

St. Thomas (20%) over Oral Roberts
UNC Wilmington (24%) over Hofstra
 

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,291
168,020
113
Rutgers also had a lot more opportunities to beat tournament teams. They should have more wins vs the fields. Arizona state played one big ten team and beat them by 20.

Arizona lost to 312 Texas Southern and feasted on beyond mediocrity from Pac 12. They also lost to San Francisco by 37
 
  • Like
Reactions: biker7766

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,291
168,020
113
Our most likely path to the Big Ten Championship is Michigan, Purdue, Michigan State, Indiana.

As things stand now:

Win championship (~3% / 22-13): 6 seed
Lose in finals (~3% / 21-14): 8 seed
Lose in semis (~7% / 20-14): 10 seed
Lose in quarters (~39% / 19-14): 11 seed (Last 4 in)
Lose in 2nd rd (~48% / 18-14): Out

Today rooting for:

St. Thomas (20%) over Oral Roberts
UNC Wilmington (24%) over Hofstra


Wtf you want Oral Roberts to win their tourney
 

fatsam98

Heisman
Mar 23, 2005
42,411
35,124
113
i think you are playing with fire....why not just have them win it all, they havent loss a conference game yet
Oh yeah agree. But slightly better for them to lose today instead of the final I guess is my point.

Their tourney is being played in South Dakota, could definitely see Oral Roberts losing to South Dakota State in the final if both progress tonight.
 
Nov 23, 2015
892
850
0
St. Thomas (20%) over Oral Roberts
Oral is such an overwhelming favorite in that conference that I'm hoping that they win it so that there is zero chance the Summit becomes two bids. I know Oral is a longshot, but rather not have them under consideration. Their current 4 losses are very strong (but their only good win over Liberty looks even weaker today).

edit - I typed this up earlier but got sidetracked...seems bac already covered my thoughts
 
  • Like
Reactions: fluoxetine

bac2therac

Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2001
238,291
168,020
113
I like they scheduled strong, I think they are a great 12 seed to pick. They already played St Marys so they cannot play them. I think they could do well vs Miami or maybe Indiana if the Hoosier slip a seed
 

Anon1751594821

All-Conference
Jul 28, 2001
2,555
2,358
0

Its simple. Beat Michigan and we’re in. Lose and we’re out

You don't know that for sure. If what Bac and others say about it is "body of work" and not counting heavier what you did at the end of the year, we still have a real good shot to make it.

On halftime just a few minutes ago, Seth Greenberg just gave Purdue, Indiana and Michigan State a good chance to go far in the tournament. We beat all 3. Penn State is considered in the field right now. We beat them TWICE. We beat Northwestern.

Obviously, if there are a bunch of upsets in the conference tournaments, it hurts our chances if we don't win on Thursday.

Best of Luck,
Groz
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,897
0
i think you are playing with fire....why not just have them win it all, they havent loss a conference game yet

Oral is such an overwhelming favorite in that conference that I'm hoping that they win it so that there is zero chance the Summit becomes two bids. I know Oral is a longshot, but rather not have them under consideration. Their current 4 losses are very strong (but their only good win over Liberty looks even weaker today).

edit - I typed this up earlier but got sidetracked...seems bac already covered my thoughts
I grabbed those from Torvik's rooting guide page to be fair. I'm not sure why it thinks Oral Roberts losing would've helped us (or why we care about UNC Wilmington / Hofstra at all, but it seemed to think UNC Wilmington winning was good).
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac