Carroo's Girlfriend Finally Press Charges
- Thread starter ksunshinescott1982
- Start date
Hmm. OP joins today, just to post this.
Certainly there's no agenda, here.
This is a cross-complaint. It's a standard defense strategy. Even if it's completely fictitious, anybody could see it coming from a mile away.
The only interesting piece of information in the article is that it's finally been revealed for the record that there were two separate incidents, several minutes apart.
Certainly there's no agenda, here.
This is a cross-complaint. It's a standard defense strategy. Even if it's completely fictitious, anybody could see it coming from a mile away.
The only interesting piece of information in the article is that it's finally been revealed for the record that there were two separate incidents, several minutes apart.
No, no, no! We have undisputed video evidence that the ENTIRE incident too place in all of 16 seconds!
The legal strategy is really, really clear.
The intent is for Carroo's side of the dispute to generate as much, or more, paperwork than the prosecution in the hopes that the court will instruct the prosecutor to dispose of all the cases before they ever see the inside of a courtroom. Everybody walks.
The intent is for Carroo's side of the dispute to generate as much, or more, paperwork than the prosecution in the hopes that the court will instruct the prosecutor to dispose of all the cases before they ever see the inside of a courtroom. Everybody walks.
The crow eating thread on this board is going to be an all time great. I mean all time.
And the hostess' strategy is also very clear, say whatever you can so you can even if they are lies so she can sue RU and Caroo to get as much money as she can. Even though she was f#%^ing around with someone's boyfriend and there is no no evidence of any injuries to her.
You do realize that LC was "f*cking around" on HIS girlfriend, right? No "evidence" of injuries? Wasn't she taken to the hospital and treated for minor injuries to her hands, hips, and head? Am I missing something here?
(** not making any claim as to knowing anything other than what has been published and police reports)
I mean seriously, enough with the domestic violence nonsense. Just release the other girl's name already.
And that proves what? Does it make Carroo any more likely guilty or innocent?
No matter what happens there are going to be a number of posters who come out of this looking really bad. Why people can't just let the justice system do their job instead of deciding guilt or innocence based on this he said she said is beyond me.
LOL, no, not at all, and not my point. Just pointing out the LC was just as guilty, if not more so, on the "f*cking around" end of things. Really saw no reason for the comment in the first place. That's all.
With all due respect, your post shows complete ignorance about how the criminal process works.
So why wait almost two weeks?
This whole case is no longer about presenting facts. It's total legal f*ckery, pure and simple.
I remember when a cat fight used to be fun. 2015 sucks.
The most interesting part of this "story" is that someone used their first post to link this "news".
Love to know who it is.
In the enhanced video, the 2nd shot shows the red jacketed people surrounding the girl in white pants. (Carroo's Girl) So who's attacking who. In that clip it appears that RU gang are the aggressors.
Who cares who eats crow if carroo doesn't play the rest of the year. It's a mute point.
Who cares it's in the judicial system at this time and that's where it will be decided, so random opinions on an internet site count for s**t. other than at some point 50% of the posters will act like a 8 year old and respond with na, na, na,na, na told you so told you so! Tedious beyond comprehension.
You are missing the point.
And this is a message board. Of course people's credibility matters.
Rutgers Football becomes pretty much of a footnote in this circus - from Carroo's side it is all about salvaging at least a passable reputation - sufficient to avoid being an unsignable pariah to the NFL ....
Exactly, treated for NOTHING and released the same night because no injuries unless you consider a scratch a major injury. If she was injured she would have spent the night for observation and healing.
That's one of my favorites. At work, very early in my career, we had a senior exec who used to always call out "mute" points and we'd all snicker in the back. A few of us who are still around still make sarcastic jokes about it to this day...
She is a Rutgers hostess AKA I. fuk4fun AKA Moral less tramp
Yes and to borrow a line I heard the other day, after reading LC's attorney say she was "intimate" with Shane, they apparently put out...
She tried to press charges initially but was rebuffed. Maybe it wasn't a strategy, but appropriate if she is telling the truth that she was attacked.
What would prohibit someone from pressing charges? What does "rebuffed" mean in this instance? They refused to do the paperwork at the scene? The next day? The next week?
You should turn in your fake internet medical degree.
Nobody gets admitted to a hospital for "observation" anymore. That went away with 3 night maternity stays.
Also, I'm pretty sure that nobody has said that she had "major injuries". Per all available reports she had injuries consistent with falling down in a paved parking lot.
Nonsense. If she had insisted on signing a complaint they would have let her sign a complaint.
What happened the night of the incident was that they didn't arrest anybody but Leonte Carroo. That's the only thing we know to be a fact. That and what I just wrote in the first sentence - which obviously didn't happen.
She could have signed a complaint at absolutely any time. That she chose to do it two days after being charged, herself (by the police) is a legal tactic.
Let's just call it what it is. They've all lawyered up to divide Leonte's first NFL contract, and it's the lawyer's job to make sure they don't kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
Also, people leave an incident agreeing that both sides are not pressing charges because they were both culpable ...but one side decides to press charges later...the other side follows suit and does the same.
Your opinion. She said she tried to press charges initially, but was rebuffed. If you believe she is lying, that is your right. But that is what she said.