HBK is in EVERYONE'S top 10. He's in EVERYONE's top 5.
He was champ when business was down. So was Bret. People make excuses for both of them because of that HBK and Bret are beloved by smarks because of their work rate. HBK draws heat because he was a prick, the clique and Montreal (but to a lesser degree than in the past).
HBK and Bret go hand in hand. They're beside each other on Mount Rushmore. The others that enter the argument are Hogan, Flair, Austin, Dwayne, and you have to put Cena into the conversation if you're having an honest conversation (though he's not going to make it).
Hogan and Flair are together. Austin and Dwayne are together. Again, to be fair, you'd either have to say this is 1980 and after or you'd have to include some older guys. There you'd have Harley Race and Bruno as the most obvious for the 70s. Then there's Buddy Rogers and guys who weren't as great but who were important - Gorgeous George.
So, that's a terrible take. Terrible. You seem to enjoy the attention you get from those posts.
You are on to one thing with Hogan - he is the most IMPORTANT wrestler of the past 30 years. He's not the BEST. Vince used him to vault WWF into the mainstream and the cover of Sports Illustrated some time in 1985. Hogan was popular and had charisma. He wasn't good though. Things don't have to be good to be important or popular. The Macarena was popular. "YMCA" is popular at corporate Christmas parties. None of them are good.