I agree with everybody on this one, but realistically you have to design your offense around the personnel you have. I honestly doubt Dinwiddie could line up in a power I formation and be as successful. We just don't routinely have the big bodies to do it. Look at the traditionally successful teams in 4a. Their offenses are geared toward there strengths. Unfortunately, some coaches attempt to instill the "spread" or "smash mouth" systems when they don't have the talent or depth to implement it. This always spells disaster. No disrespect intended, but when we played Lake Taylor this season we did not see their vaunted veer in heavy doses. Some of it was their attack plan (power running up the middle and double moves on corners), but I tend to believe they over thought it and got away from what has made them successful. They did the same thing against Salem in the 2015 Championship game. The Titans failed to gain yardage on the pitch or cut a few times in the first half and gave up on it. Yes, Salem's defense played a part in the change, but you cannot abandon your strength. I will give Salem credit. They usually put in a few wrinkles, but they generally stick to their strength. That is why they consistently win.
Other factors regarding the change in offensive strategies include: The constant change in rules to protect the players, (Like it or not its here to stay), declining interest in football (depth) and the overall speed of the defenses. It is extremely hard to run the ball on the outside in todays game.. A majority of the yards gained on the ground come through counters, dives and traps. I think we scored 14 rushing touchdowns on plays between the guard and tackle.
mbonape1, don't get discouraged you still have LC Bird to keep the ground and pound game alive. .