College football coaches make to much money

brgossRU90

Senior
Oct 9, 2007
1,103
709
0
Should we trust you to set prices and wages?

No. One thing that should be done, however, is to remove market distortions or mechanisms that have been put in place by those with a vested interest to inflate their incomes. If the "market will bear it" but it's a f ed up market than it should be fixed. War time profiteers in the past were known for hoarding raw materials in order to greatly inflate the price of those commodities. The resulting market then allowed them to get huge prices--but that was a manipulated market not an honest one.
 

LevaosLectures

All-Conference
Jun 28, 2015
3,977
3,156
0
UMass is paying Mark Whipple half a million bucks for zero....yes ZERO....benefit to the university.

Rutgers is paying Kyle Food 1.5 million for doing appreciable harm to the university.
 

patk89

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
6,290
2,413
78
No. One thing that should be done, however, is to remove market distortions or mechanisms that have been put in place by those with a vested interest to inflate their incomes. If the "market will bear it" but it's a f ed up market than it should be fixed. War time profiteers in the past were known for hoarding raw materials in order to greatly inflate the price of those commodities. The resulting market then allowed them to get huge prices--but that was a manipulated market not an honest one.

So you are comparing the hiring of P5 football coaches to war profiteering and saying that there are multiple great dynamic inspirational football coaches that are being paid not to interview for P5 positions (held back from supply) so that the current crop of average coaches are overpaid? I'd throw you out of the class with such an incredibly stupid argument.

Tell me how to remove "market distortions" from the market for college football coaches Mr. Genius? How would you increase the supply of talented personable football coaches who will interview for openings. Dumb/dumb/dumb. Does Brad Pitt "deserve" what he is paid? Of course not. But he has things that only a handful of people on the planet have. Will Obama be worth the insane money that he will earn post presidency? Compared to the majority of his classmates at Columbia who had better grades? Of course not but the market will pay.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
195,623
147,229
113
No. One thing that should be done, however, is to remove market distortions or mechanisms that have been put in place by those with a vested interest to inflate their incomes. If the "market will bear it" but it's a f ed up market than it should be fixed. War time profiteers in the past were known for hoarding raw materials in order to greatly inflate the price of those commodities. The resulting market then allowed them to get huge prices--but that was a manipulated market not an honest one.

What do you do for a living?
 

Extra Point_rivals157299

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2001
13,169
4,691
0
To be clear I am not angry, I am indifferent to HC salaries. My other question is, can't anyone learn the skills to be a head coach? Half the board members seem to be better coaches than Coach Flood. So if there was a cap, say 2 million dollars was the max that a HC could get, then the super star coaches would quit and then I can get the job. It seems like a lot of fun and I would work very hard for 1 or 2 million dollars a year.

In reality I guess it is just a simple matter of economics, expensive coaches make more money for a university than less expensive coaches do.
 

MozRU

All-Conference
Oct 3, 2005
12,510
2,186
0
To be clear I am not angry, I am indifferent to HC salaries. My other question is, can't anyone learn the skills to be a head coach? Half the board members seem to be better coaches than Coach Flood. So if there was a cap, say 2 million dollars was the max that a HC could get, then the super star coaches would quit and then I can get the job. It seems like a lot of fun and I would work very hard for 1 or 2 million dollars a year.

In reality I guess it is just a simple matter of economics, expensive coaches make more money for a university than less expensive coaches do.
I have friends in the business.

Sit down with 3 guys and ask about their experiences:

1. The 40yr old position coach journeyman with two kids.
2. The 25yr old GA making ZERO who sometimes sleeps in his a locker rooms between jobs.
3. A Power 5 National Champion head coach

You'd be surprised what you will learn. #3 are some of the best CEOs in the land
 

EastOT71

Redshirt
Sep 5, 2015
12
5
0
Well thats only partially true. For one thing - the financials of CFB and colleges in general are a mess. Its hard to claim any ROI at all given the accounting except for the top top teams. The other is - there is alot more money to throw around since they cant pay the players the salaries that many of them would demand on an open market.

So yes - the answer is that coaches are basically beneficiaries of players not getting paid. That money has got to go somewhere, and since there isnt rigorous accounting, teams can often spend more than they should in an attempt to keep up.

LOL at Saban brining in BILLIONS. No - Saban has brought in some incremental improvement over a worse coach. But Alabama football the entity would make alot of those tens of millions even with an average coach - Saban is responsible for the increase over that.
Alabama the football entity is what it is because present and previous coaches won lots of football games. Without the wins, the mystique evaporates pretty quickly. What has football mediocrity cost the University of Miami?