Cosby charged..could Wet Willie be next?

Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0

HAHAHAHAHAHA! You cite a reference that states the exact opposite of your claim.

 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
I've still yet to see where Bill Clinton forcibly drugged, raped, or anything close to that to make him a "sexual predator". The man likes sex...with younger women.....who like to have sex with men who are in power......[eyeroll].......finding it hard to call him a "sexual predator".....
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,947
609
113
I didn't know Bill Clinton was accused of being a rapist. Show me the link to that story....

I don't think Bill Clinton was accused of being a rapist. I do know that any person in most all companies who had relations with an intern would be fired regardless if they were consensual or not.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
I don't think Bill Clinton was accused of being a rapist. I do know that any person in most all companies who had relations with an intern would be fired regardless if they were consensual or not.

I agree to that. But dating all the way back to Harding (maybe earlier), things like this has happened in the White House.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,947
609
113
No. Please assist.

Do you really think several who post here are going to say anything negative or speak the truth about certain people. They will defend and deflect like good storm troopers to the death.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
HAHAHAHAHAHA! You cite a reference that states the exact opposite of your claim.

This is why you shouldn't trust your own judgment. I remembered this piece about Paul's accusations of Bill Clinton. I remember it had both the accusation and the rebuttal. That's why I posted it. You assumed a claim when no claim was made. The failure is yours.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
Do you really think several who post here are going to say anything negative or speak the truth about certain people. They will defend and deflect like good storm troopers to the death.
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding's was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
29,947
609
113
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.

You see the mentality I'm talking about.......they post a picture of Bush.
 
Last edited:

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,561
742
113
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding's was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.

Technically your story actually answered the question. The question was asked "I didnt know Clinton had been accused of rape, can someone show me a link" and in your link it confirmed that Kathleen Willey accused Bill of rape/

Now the validity of her claim is questionable. The story suggested there were holes in her story but did not explain further.

He has been accused of rape. So the "anit-racist" spelling Nazi was incorrect again.
 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
This is why you shouldn't trust your own judgment. I remembered this piece about Paul's accusations of Bill Clinton. I remember it had both the accusation and the rebuttal. That's why I posted it. You assumed a claim when no claim was made. The failure is yours.

The challenge was to provide a link where Clinton was accused of rape. You cited a reference that was Rand Paul making up a bunch of horse ****, which got three Pinocchios. That, my friend, is a fail. Bush had nothing to do with it. I could have picked out any fail picture; Bush holding the phone upside down was just icing on the cake.
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
You see the mentality I'm talking about.......a picture of Bush.
O
The challenge was to provide a link where Clinton was accused of rape. You cited a reference that was Rand Paul making up a bunch of horse ****, which got three Pinocchios. That, my friend, is a fail. Bush had nothing to do with it. I could have picked out any fail picture; Bush holding the phone upside down was just icing on the cake.
No, failure is assuming something to be true when in fact it is false.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,561
742
113
The challenge was to provide a link where Clinton was accused of rape. You cited a reference that was Rand Paul making up a bunch of horse ****, which got three Pinocchios. That, my friend, is a fail. Bush had nothing to do with it. I could have picked out any fail picture; Bush holding the phone upside down was just icing on the cake.
What claim did he make? You missed his point completely.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding's was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.

So, what's the difference between a 40 something married woman and a 23 year old unmarried person? You act as if one is not as bad as another. Bill wasn't going in and grabbing some 16 year old or 18 year old.
 

KTeer

Redshirt
Jul 24, 2014
289
5
0
Google Juanita Broderick and come back and tell us he is not a racist. My bet is that Trump has some good Epstein info.
Lip biting is the MO of a rapist. I know you would prefer to ignore Bill's long history of being a predator; he is a big scumbag.
 

MikeRafone

Freshman
Oct 5, 2011
4,238
53
0
Trump is running the mud slinging a little early this season. Can't beat Hilly-Bob, so go after her husband with long disproved allegations to see if they have legs.

The flip side is Hillary folks, and the other Republicans in the field have good info on Trump's known, not implied, ties to Nicky Scarfo, Paul Castellano, Tony Salerno, Sal Testa, and his special assistant, Russian mobster fixer, Felix Sater.

Bill may bed women, but Humpty Trumpy is in bed with the Mob and has been since the mid-70's. He paid Sal Testa, the Sicilian Heroin King, over two times the value of the empty lot Testa owned to make it the site of the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City. Scarfo used to run a human slaughterhouse in his basement in Philly but he got those unions to work for Trump in Jersey. Don's got some nice friends.

I wonder how much Trump paid Sater for Don's current wife? "Tell you what Feel, tell her old man I'll give him six cows and a '78 Monte Carlo for the broad. See what he counters with."
 

CAJUNEER_rivals

Redshirt
May 29, 2001
72,872
44
0
So, what's the difference between a 40 something married woman and a 23 year old unmarried person? You act as if one is not as bad as another. Bill wasn't going in and grabbing some 16 year old or 18 year old.
Lewinski was an intern--an employee of the White House. Hardings love affair was with a woman not under his authority.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
Lewinski was an intern--an employee of the White House. Hardings love affair was with a woman not under his authority.

But, you said "just past teenage" intern. Insinuating age was an issue. If your issue was the job of the intern, why put the age in there?
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
I think age is an issue. Interns are typically young.

She was an adult. She was 22-23 years old, correct? I don't see an issue with that. I see younger women and older men all the time.

Now, the other issue as far as the "boss" and the "intern".....I can see your argument. But to insinuate that she was some 18-19 year old who was taken advantage of is....well....ridiculous.
 

mneilmont

Sophomore
Jan 23, 2008
20,883
166
0
She was an adult. She was 22-23 years old, correct? I don't see an issue with that. I see younger women and older men all the time.

Now, the other issue as far as the "boss" and the "intern".....I can see your argument. But to insinuate that she was some 18-19 year old who was taken advantage of is....well....ridiculous.
She was at the WH 95-96 and was born 7-23-73, so was clearly a consenting adult over the age of 21.

The real problem that I have, she was in an UNPAID position until December of '95. She/they began the sexual activity in November of 1995 and continued thru March 1997 per Lewinski. No one has a problem with that timing? Taxpayer began paying her to service the President after one month of freebies? I don't approve of extramarital activity of the President, but if he insists, at least pay for your own whores instead of putting them on government payroll.