Some liberal Democrat judge will get him off. He and Bill Clinton two peas in the same pod.Sexual Predators are the lowest human beings on earth.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...dozen-women-called-clinton-a-sexual-predator/I didn't know Bill Clinton was accused of being a rapist. Show me the link to that story....
What did I claim?HAHAHAHAHAHA! You cite a reference that states the exact opposite of your claim.
![]()
I didn't know Bill Clinton was accused of being a rapist. Show me the link to that story....
HAHAHAHAHAHA! You cite a reference that states the exact opposite of your claim.
![]()
I don't think Bill Clinton was accused of being a rapist. I do know that any person in most all companies who had relations with an intern would be fired regardless if they were consensual or not.
What difference does that make?I agree to that. But dating all the way back to Harding (maybe earlier), things like this has happened in the White House.
I agree to that. But dating all the way back to Harding (maybe earlier), things like this has happened in the White House.
What difference does that make?
HAHAHAHAHAHA! You cite a reference that states the exact opposite of your claim.
![]()
No. Please assist.Surely you can figure that out.
No. Please assist.
This is why you shouldn't trust your own judgment. I remembered this piece about Paul's accusations of Bill Clinton. I remember it had both the accusation and the rebuttal. That's why I posted it. You assumed a claim when no claim was made. The failure is yours.HAHAHAHAHAHA! You cite a reference that states the exact opposite of your claim.
![]()
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding's was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.Do you really think several who post here are going to say anything negative or speak the truth about certain people. They will defend and deflect like good storm troopers to the death.
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding's was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.
HAHAHAHAHAHA! You cite a reference that states the exact opposite of your claim.
This is why you shouldn't trust your own judgment. I remembered this piece about Paul's accusations of Bill Clinton. I remember it had both the accusation and the rebuttal. That's why I posted it. You assumed a claim when no claim was made. The failure is yours.
OYou see the mentality I'm talking about.......a picture of Bush.
No, failure is assuming something to be true when in fact it is false.The challenge was to provide a link where Clinton was accused of rape. You cited a reference that was Rand Paul making up a bunch of horse ****, which got three Pinocchios. That, my friend, is a fail. Bush had nothing to do with it. I could have picked out any fail picture; Bush holding the phone upside down was just icing on the cake.
I think it was a fail meme. Don't be so sensitive.You see the mentality I'm talking about.......they post a picture of Bush.
O
No, failure is assuming something to be true when in fact it is false.
What claim did he make? You missed his point completely.The challenge was to provide a link where Clinton was accused of rape. You cited a reference that was Rand Paul making up a bunch of horse ****, which got three Pinocchios. That, my friend, is a fail. Bush had nothing to do with it. I could have picked out any fail picture; Bush holding the phone upside down was just icing on the cake.
I wanted to see someone explain the relevance. But you're right. They can't. BTW, Harding's was a love affair with a married woman not a just-past-teenage WH intern.
Lewinski was an intern--an employee of the White House. Hardings love affair was with a woman not under his authority.So, what's the difference between a 40 something married woman and a 23 year old unmarried person? You act as if one is not as bad as another. Bill wasn't going in and grabbing some 16 year old or 18 year old.
Lewinski was an intern--an employee of the White House. Hardings love affair was with a woman not under his authority.
I think age is an issue. Interns are typically young.But, you said "just past teenage" intern. Insinuating age was an issue. If your issue was the job of the intern, why put the age in there?
I think age is an issue. Interns are typically young.
She was at the WH 95-96 and was born 7-23-73, so was clearly a consenting adult over the age of 21.She was an adult. She was 22-23 years old, correct? I don't see an issue with that. I see younger women and older men all the time.
Now, the other issue as far as the "boss" and the "intern".....I can see your argument. But to insinuate that she was some 18-19 year old who was taken advantage of is....well....ridiculous.