CREEK is my real team and we will demolish Vance in a few weeks... the game was over in the 1st quarter if Creek doesn’t play down to Butler.. 29-2 was a blowout early and should have been 50-2...
Creek gave Bulter the opportunities they got!... Dont let the score fool you...A busted play here and there... Butler was as bad as I thought.. I know exactly what I’m talking about... Maybe 30 penalties on Creek.. dumb penalties.. of course some momentum will shift... Creek offense came to play maybe a quarter and a half of football!.. Turnovers and bad decisions kept this game close .. not Butlers athletes!....SEE YOU SOON COUGARSDAD
The penalty count was Mallard Creek 18 and Butler 10. Not 30.
Mallard Creek had two turnovers and Butler had one.
Butler missed a field goal and lost their kicker
Absolutely!...But don’t say swallow your pride.., Butler was what I expected.. I couple athletes that can make the game interesting like I stated when I posted this thread!.. I believed and still believe that Creek is 30-40 pts better. Butlers QB was exactly what I thought.. NOT good enough to beat CREEK...10-27passing...much different than last week against the SCOTS as I predicted ..Sloppy play by Creek let Butler back in the game!..Good luck the rest of the season!
My issue is that according to you Mallard Creek was the only team that had sloppy play.
Butler had 5-6 dropped passes, had a punt blocked for a TD, missed a field goal, lost their kicker because of Mallard Creeks sloppy play and Lesane didn’t play the second half because of a brain fart. For the record Mallard Creek had 18 penalties for 180 yards and Butler had 10 for 103 according to the Observer.
For those who didn’t see the game Butler’s sloppy play was part of the reason they were down and Mallard Creek’s sloppy play is what helped the comeback. Mallard Creek is better no doubt about that but I dont know any other teams in the state besides maybe Wake Forest or a Vance that could’ve come back and made it a game.