Wait, I thought you had posted in the past Trump hurt the GOP when on ballot? He was not on the ballot yesterday.
I didn't even watch the news last night. The news built this up. We saw losing polls and I accepted those as accurate.
The shut down probably hurt the GOP.
Do you think the tariffs have been effective or have value?
I enjoy your posts even if I don't always agree. Yesterday could/should have been better for the Repubs but they likely were losing in NJ and NY. Several of the pundits talked about how many Republicans have moved from those locations and the hollowing out of the Republican base. I think there is a lot of truth there. The remaining Dem base votes Dem, even if for an attorney general (Virginia) who is a horrid person.
I think it is a worrying aspect of America as we are getting geographically partisan. It should be one country but it is not. Communists, er Social Democrats are ascending in the major cities which control major states and I have no idea what a regular Democrat is anymore.
It's funny but the Jewish leaders in NY are warning Mamdani about what he does as mayor, after they voted for him. He is going to do what he wants, he already ignored them the entire campaign. Why did they vote for him?
The migration point was from Fox and it is accurate but I would concede that NJ and NY were already hopelessly Dem. The Dems can run people with checkered backgrounds and the base is inclined to support the party bosses, and because Repubs have moved to get away from the madness it is increasingly a slam dunk.Rs lost VA by 5 and NJ by 6 in 2024.
Twelve months later, they lost Gov races by 15 and 13.
Mobility of the electorate seems like a pretty obvious lie to me. That whole year (a year where mobility is way down from, say, 2021 and 2022).
Seems like persuasion and to an extent differential turnout was the issue.
I’d brace myself for big fat Ls in 2026 and 2028 too if the strategy is Vance running for a third Trump term.
This is interesting. More housing would be available and cheaper without the mass influx of illegals. Also student debt is an easy fix. Get the government out of the student loan business.
You didn't answer my question on Tariffs.I think Trump is an underperformer generally, but non Prez elections tend to go OK for the President’s party when the Prez has a good approval rating and badly when he doesn’t.
Trump is at 43-44 right now which is bad.
When you look at areas with huge swings to Trump in 2024, especially Hispanic ones in NJ, there was massive swings back to Dems last night. I suspect it was some combo of persuasion (Dem voters who didn’t like Biden giving an entertaining R a chance but moving back to Dems because inflation is still hitting them) and turnout (Trump cleaned up among the lowest information voters who may only show up in the Prez year or may have only shown up for Trump and aren’t regular Presidential voters).
My big takeaway from yesterday is that Youngkin or Rubio would have won by like 7% in 2024, sweeping almost every swing race in the House/Senate. There was a whole lot of voters, especially working class minorities, who thought Trump would bring back his 2019 economy; he hasn’t delivered and they didn’t vote R yesterday. Trump got these voters in 2024 while bleeding educated whites (even ones that don’t like Dems).
Honestly the concerns for the GOP about electoral prospects before 2030 should be really high. Trump isn’t doing much to be liked and the voters decisive for him seem to have limited allegiance to other Rs.
Sounds awful like Obama to me!
It isn't worth pointing out your incorrect statements or your inconsistencies, because your reply is to attempt to castigate the person/persons correcting you and then you disappear for a month or so !I think Trump is an underperformer generally, but non Prez elections tend to go OK for the President’s party when the Prez has a good approval rating and badly when he doesn’t.
Trump is at 43-44 right now which is bad.
When you look at areas with huge swings to Trump in 2024, especially Hispanic ones in NJ, there was massive swings back to Dems last night. I suspect it was some combo of persuasion (Dem voters who didn’t like Biden giving an entertaining R a chance but moving back to Dems because inflation is still hitting them) and turnout (Trump cleaned up among the lowest information voters who may only show up in the Prez year or may have only shown up for Trump and aren’t regular Presidential voters).
My big takeaway from yesterday is that Youngkin or Rubio would have won by like 7% in 2024, sweeping almost every swing race in the House/Senate. There was a whole lot of voters, especially working class minorities, who thought Trump would bring back his 2019 economy; he hasn’t delivered and they didn’t vote R yesterday. Trump got these voters in 2024 while bleeding educated whites (even ones that don’t like Dems).
Honestly the concerns for the GOP about electoral prospects before 2030 should be really high. Trump isn’t doing much to be liked and the voters decisive for him seem to have limited allegiance to other Rs.
Sounds awful like Obama to me!
I like to believe this is most dependent IF PARENTS require their children to EARN whatever they are presented with is a reward for ACTUAL WORK, either in the classroom or in the work force !This is a major issue. Biden(in addition to not being friendly to fossils) flooded our demand in this country. As Trump tries to deport, the left fights him tooth and nails. But the educated have this all figured out and vote against the GOP as things are still expensive???
That makes zero sense.
@dtrain79 funny story you can verify with pics on my fb:
I just came off back to back trips to Vegas and Key West. Of the four ladies that went with us, my wife is the least educated and has an MBA and has a pretty big job. Two of the other ladies had law degrees and are very accomplished. The other one is a CEO of a technology company worth into the billions and has a masters in accounting. These are all well educated and very accomplished women making mega bucks in the real world. They are all consistent GOP voters. They all voted for Trump. Now a couple of them do not love Trumps demeanor(to be fair), but all understand real world decisions and consequences. One is from Canada before moving to Dallas and she can't believe how dumb her country is. She hated the 51st state talk and I agree.
But I regress, the 5 roommates in college of my DIL are all on anti-depressants among other things and none have accomplished anything more than the piece of paper. Guaranteed none could name a policy or even the name of the speaker of the house or any cause and effect on economy or foreign policy, but are considered "high information voters". This is all based on them spending 4+ years at a communist US college. All hate "Orange Man Bad"
You want to measure high information voters? Show me a study of highly productive citizens in the private sector. My x wife went back and graduated from law school post our divorce. She went in as a staunch conservative and came out a huge liberal post 40. She has not held a job in over 10 years post law school, but will tell you just how smart she is. She lives off what I gave her at divorce settlement.
Agree. My wife and I paid for college for our kids, but there is a hard stop when they leave college. We literally pay for nothing with the exception of health ins(to 26 as needed). They also are not allowed to move back home post college. Last year(when I was sick), I updated my will and trust. I made it not pay anything until the age of 35 for my kids. I also limited the amount they can take out of it for 10 years. I also limited my son's inheretance if he is still married to the dumb pot smoking liberal when I die. I didn't work hard in my life to have my earnings flow to the left.I like to believe this is most dependent IF PARENTS require their children to EARN whatever they are presented with is a reward for ACTUAL WORK, either in the classroom or in the work force !
My Sister's working summers and after school, my kids not in a basement (except Matt, in his weight/conditioning, wrestling mat area in this basement !)
We expect results from our children !
The collegiate system is playing a huge part in the destruction of our society. There are any number of incoming college kids who go in with solid upbringing and come out of college as leftist zombies. People with minds that aren’t as strong who are surrounded by the wrong crowd surely do become unrecognizable libs. The old saying was “If you are 20 and a Republican, you have no heart. If you’re 40 and a Democrat, you have no brain.” We have a lot of people with no brains running around our country.This is a major issue. Biden(in addition to not being friendly to fossils) flooded our demand in this country. As Trump tries to deport, the left fights him tooth and nails. But the educated have this all figured out and vote against the GOP as things are still expensive???
That makes zero sense.
@dtrain79 funny story you can verify with pics on my fb:
I just came off back to back trips to Vegas and Key West. Of the four ladies that went with us, my wife is the least educated and has an MBA and has a pretty big job. Two of the other ladies had law degrees and are very accomplished. The other one is a CEO of a technology company worth into the billions and has a masters in accounting. These are all well educated and very accomplished women making mega bucks in the real world. They are all consistent GOP voters. They all voted for Trump. Now a couple of them do not love Trumps demeanor(to be fair), but all understand real world decisions and consequences. One is from Canada before moving to Dallas and she can't believe how dumb her country is. She hated the 51st state talk and I agree.
But I regress, the 5 roommates in college of my DIL are all on anti-depressants among other things and none have accomplished anything more than the piece of paper. Guaranteed none could name a policy or even the name of the speaker of the house or any cause and effect on economy or foreign policy, but are considered "high information voters". This is all based on them spending 4+ years at a communist US college. All hate "Orange Man Bad"
You want to measure high information voters? Show me a study of highly productive citizens in the private sector. My x wife went back and graduated from law school post our divorce. She went in as a staunch conservative and came out a huge liberal post 40. She has not held a job in over 10 years post law school, but will tell you just how smart she is. She lives off what I gave her at divorce settlement.
Nothing has changed in the past 50 + years.The collegiate system is playing a huge part in the destruction of our society. There are any number of incoming college kids who go in with solid upbringing and come out of college as leftist zombies. People with minds that aren’t as strong who are surrounded by the wrong crowd surely do become unrecognizable libs. The old saying was “If you are 20 and a Republican, you have no heart. If you’re 40 and a Democrat, you have no brain.” We have a lot of people with no brains running around our country.
The collegiate system is playing a huge part in the destruction of our society. There are any number of incoming college kids who go in with solid upbringing and come out of college as leftist zombies. People with minds that aren’t as strong who are surrounded by the wrong crowd surely do become unrecognizable libs. The old saying was “If you are 20 and a Republican, you have no heart. If you’re 40 and a Democrat, you have no brain.” We have a lot of people with no brains running around our country.
The migration point was from Fox and it is accurate but I would concede that NJ and NY were already hopelessly Dem. The Dems can run people with checkered backgrounds and the base is inclined to support the party bosses, and because Repubs have moved to get away from the madness it is increasingly a slam dunk.
So what is a Dem in 2025? The governors in NJ and Virginia ran as moderates. Does that exist anymore at their national level?
The Dems desperately need to turn on the Federal funding spigots for their NGO's that Trump has turned off. 2026 and 2028 are the most important elections in their history. Saint Gavin Newsome is ready to serve.
You didn't answer my question on Tariffs.
If SCOTUS stops the POTUS from having tariff power, all current deals he took across the finish line would still be in effect. I think that would open the door to China, Canada, etc to abuse the US in trade and would generally be bad for the USA and the stock market.
Do you believe Trump used tariffs to successfully tamp down conflicts across the globe? Do you see the massive tariff haul as a good thing as inflation remains reasonable?
It isn't worth pointing out your incorrect statements or your inconsistencies, because your reply is to attempt to castigate the person/persons correcting you and then you disappear for a month or so !
This is a major issue. Biden(in addition to not being friendly to fossils) flooded our demand in this country. As Trump tries to deport, the left fights him tooth and nails. But the educated have this all figured out and vote against the GOP as things are still expensive???
That makes zero sense.
@dtrain79 funny story you can verify with pics on my fb:
I just came off back to back trips to Vegas and Key West. Of the four ladies that went with us, my wife is the least educated and has an MBA and has a pretty big job. Two of the other ladies had law degrees and are very accomplished. The other one is a CEO of a technology company worth into the billions and has a masters in accounting. These are all well educated and very accomplished women making mega bucks in the real world. They are all consistent GOP voters. They all voted for Trump. Now a couple of them do not love Trumps demeanor(to be fair), but all understand real world decisions and consequences. One is from Canada before moving to Dallas and she can't believe how dumb her country is. She hated the 51st state talk and I agree.
But I regress, the 5 roommates in college of my DIL are all on anti-depressants among other things and none have accomplished anything more than the piece of paper. Guaranteed none could name a policy or even the name of the speaker of the house or any cause and effect on economy or foreign policy, but are considered "high information voters". This is all based on them spending 4+ years at a communist US college. All hate "Orange Man Bad"
You want to measure high information voters? Show me a study of highly productive citizens in the private sector. My x wife went back and graduated from law school post our divorce. She went in as a staunch conservative and came out a huge liberal post 40. She has not held a job in over 10 years post law school, but will tell you just how smart she is. She lives off what I gave her at divorce settlement.
...and to the converse you love to constantly point out the uneducated likes the GOP/ Trump. My post was relevant to your post. I don't spend time contemplating until I read your "low information voter" posts that don't resemble reality.Almost every person you know is a high information voter.
You spend far too much time contemplating how people who share your political views are awesome and how those who don't are terrible. There are tons of rich Republicans and tons of rich Democrats. Because America is rich.
I'm not sure how we got to the Team Red versus Team Blue distinction. I can only hope in a decade it will no longer be a thing, then again it was a decade ago Trump first showed up so I'm probably way too optimistic.
Well, there is common sense evidence. It may take time, but ultimately selling products not manufactured here will be more costly. Any product manufactured elsewhere and sold to the world's largest market will have to now factor a new "cost of goods" to sell in this market and compare to making it here. It also gives US companies an advantage. I know we have liberal studies and talking heads that will argue there is no real evidence. I looked them up on AI after reading your post. My son consults here for companies selling in big box retailers. He said there is no real significant cost being passed on to the consumer that he can see in his space. He actually talked about a couple of his customers that bring products in from China that negotiated with Target to switch to end caps and they both ate some of the tariff to stay competitive with similar products elsewhere. Yes, it is anecdotal, but considering product sellers have to compete online with similar products at say a Walmart or Best Buy. These are all easily shopped online by a consumer. The consumer has the advantage with ease of comparing nowadays.I think tariffs are bad policy as a general proposition, there's no evidence they are bringing back manufacturing, and there are far better geopolitical tools at the President's disposal (sanctions being an obvious example).
I have no idea why Republicans feel compelled to defend bad policy because a single guy claiming to be a Republican likes them.
All that said, not every tariff ever was unwarranted. Some China tariffs are absolutely warranted. Some tariffs on trading partners with Russia make sense to me (could use sanctions as well).
...and to the converse you love to constantly point out the uneducated likes the GOP/ Trump. My post was relevant to your post. I don't spend time contemplating until I read your "low information voter" posts.
Well, there is common sense evidence. It may take time, but ultimately selling products not manufactured here will be more costly. Any product manufactured elsewhere and sold to the world's largest market will have to now factor a new "cost of goods" to sell in this market and compare to making it here. It also gives US companies an advantage. I know we have liberal studies and talking heads that will argue there is no real evidence. I looked them up on AI after reading your post. My son consults here for companies selling in big box retailers. He said there is no real significant cost being passed on to the consumer that he can see in his space. He actually talked about a couple of his customers that bring products in from China that negotiated with Target to switch to end caps and they both ate some of the tariff to stay competitive with similar products elsewhere. Yes, it is anecdotal, but considering product sellers have to compete online with similar products at say a Walmart or Best Buy. These are all easily shopped online by a consumer. The consumer has the advantage with ease of comparing nowadays.
Claiming to be Republican? If I want men in women's sports, open borders, and higher taxes am I claiming to be a democrat? Seems to me Trump governs like a R.
It was a perfect storm for the Rs. Even though they should have lost and did. The controlling party is almost always blamed for problems. The problems need to be significant enough to be recognized easily. Kamala had two massive issues right off the top. Inflation and the border were not something a weak candidate can overcome. This week the dems rode the shut down that they voted for into some better numbers as the wins were coming either way.I believe it's been Trump that lauds his success among the less educated.
But I will explain. The average Trump voter is not a lower information voter. And for sure the average MAGA acolyte is not a low information voter.
Trump put up historic numbers among certain working class groups (especially Hispanics) in a variety of places throughout the country (interestingly, not all Hispanic heavy areas, but a lot). Many of those who voted for him aren't even regular Presidential race voters. Some are Presidential-race only, voting once every 4 years consistently.
Historically among such groups, Democrats feasted. However, Trump made major inroads among them, and almost certainly a lot of his "winning margin" was generated in these groups. When both parties are basically guaranteed 45% as they currently are, pockets of swing voters take on added importance. And "low information Trump curious minorities" were a big, big swing voter group in 2024, discussed extensively before the election btw. These people snapped back massively towards Dems in NJ/VA last night, it's a huge issue for Rs.
I'm linking the below article from Steve Kornacki discussing this group in NJ.
Steve Kornacki: 2 warnings for Republicans in NJ governor results – NBC10 Philadelphia
When the premise of their theories are based on the assumption there was fair and equitable trade when Trump took office, I stop listening.It's your party, not mine, define it as you wish. I don't think Trump was a Republican consistent with the party's history in 2015. The party's voters have evolved in a mutually reinforcing way with him. I'm comfortable not changing my views, so I advocate for neither team at this point.
As for the tariffs, I have no idea what "liberal studies" folks have weighed. If you mean economists, it just happens to be by far the most conservative set of "academics" we have. Yes, economists think widespread tariffs are stupid policy, because economists tend to have insight into things like the global supply chain, comparative advantage, and price competitiveness. Javier Milei (I know you know him) happens to be ... an economist! Go figure!
When the premise of their theories are based on the assumption there was fair and equitable trade when Trump took office, I stop listening.
That is pure fantasy. You have to speak to what was real in the actual US trade deals and the real long term implications of not having a reckoning.
Getting rid of 10,000,000 illegals is a great start !This is true of most big cities. It is not a healthy trend imo. Not sure what the solution is but adding 10 million illegal immigrants didn't help.
View attachment 990366
You should refrain from economics, about which your comments and track record since Jan 20 Th are proof positive that your intellect is still suffering from TDS 2.0 !On average, I believe US exporters paid about an average rate of 3-4% in tariffs, while imports into the US were about 2.5%.
I'm not sure how that 1% differential was particularly impactful, but I do know that the USA has definitely benefited from the world trading order in my lifetime.
It feels sometimes like people want to make arguments about certain industries we'd want to more seriously consider repatriating but that gets lost in the "must defend Trump" shuffle.
When the premise of their theories are based on the assumption there was fair and equitable trade when Trump took office, I stop listening.
That is pure fantasy. You have to speak to what was real in the actual US trade deals and the real long term implications of not having a reckoning.