Damnit, Plaschke. This article almost makes me want to pull for Auburn. Almost.
I don't keep up with all the figures but because how the SEC is set up, we kind of want to continually have teams in the BCS since we reap some of the finances. I don't know if it matters if them winning or not effects how much they get though.<div>
</div><div>Also... Did Plaschke refer to Vanderbilt as an out of conference school?</div><div>
</div><div>"<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; ">Since then, while the Pac-10 schools continue to beat each other into anonymity, the SEC powers have gotten fat on nonconference games against Louisiana trade schools and homecomings against Vanderbilt."</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; ">
</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 20px; ">I've always thought Plaschke was a dumbass, at least there's proof in his writings. Also, that sentence is filled with so much spin. He talks about how the Pac-10 continually plays a hard in conference schedule, but talks about the SEC's OOC schedule when basically the same argument can be said for both conferences 10 fold. You mean to tell me that New Mexico, Tennessee and Portland State is oh so much harder than Arkansas State, Clemson, ULM and Chattanooga? Get real...</span></div>