I'm sorry, I thought we were trying to Make America Great Again? Is that not a call to return to times past? The period in US history when the middle class was strongest, the period when the income needed to buy a family size home was 2-3x your salary vs 5+x your salary, and when the American Dream of upward mobility was at its easiest, just so happened to be during a time when the top .1% was taxed at a higher rate. Now, correlation != causation, but the wealth disparity between the masses and the top .1% just so happened to skyrocket at the same time that tax burden was lowered. As the wealth disparity grows, the masses get more restless and you end up with riots/strikes/violence/etc.
Is it fair? Eh, probably not, but i don't really care about the feelings of people who have a higher net worth than the GDPs of some countries.
My guy, you and I both know that’s not how our progressive tax system works. In 1950, every dollar over $200k ($2.5m in today’s dollars) was taxed at 91%. Hence the 42% effective rate in the article you didn’t readAbsurd concept. For a SC resident:
91% federal income tax
1.45% Medicare tax (plus employer tax)
0.9% Medicare surcharge tax
6% state income tax
Total = 99.35% tax rate
So you get less than a penny for every incremental dollar you earn. And if you factor in the employer side tax or are self-employed, you will somehow pay more in taxes than you earn.
Completely absurd. 37% is fine for a top rate. Maybe add 40% for income over $5M if you want to squeeze more from the top.
My guy, you and I both know that’s not how our progressive tax system works. In 1950, every dollar over $200k ($2.5m in today’s dollars) was taxed at 91%. Hence the 42% effective rate in the article you didn’t read
lol actually i didn't oopsDid you not notice the word “incremental” in my post? That addresses the marginal tax rate issue you raise. I was accurate.
Ok so you agree with my original statement. Good to know.He has stated he wants more money in order to fund his dream of extending civilization to Mars.
He has also stated that he wants to do it honestly. He has also done everything in his past, honestly. I have no reason to distrust him. Does he exaggerate? Yes. Does he make mistakes, yes. Is he Human? I don't know.
What i do know, is that he has good intentions. That he is an avid capitalist. That he is smart as hell.
So, if he gets more money and is in charge of allocating that capital, I am absolutely 100% OK with that. He earned that money by making products that the masses want.
He is not hoarding his money. He is making products that makes the lives of billions of humans better. He is allocating capital in a way better than any other human can. We should be praising him.
Absolutely right. It is nothing but theft that the government get to hold a gun to your head and take anything that a person earns without their say. We should absolutely do away with the IRS and go back to when there was no income tax. I am fine with a federal sales tax and we could discuss what that should look like, but whatever it is at least I get to decide how much of my money I pay in taxes.It’s an absurd concept that someone should keep so little of a dollar they earn. Completely absurd.
If you want to go back in time, let’s just go back to before there were income taxes at all.
They will get nowhere close to "savings" of $1 trillion. Even $1 trillion would not balance the budget nor eat into the debt. Therefore, no reduction in interest rates.We will be rewarded by having long term interest rates come down.
If that $5000 can stimulate the economy so that it produces returns in excess of $5000 that would be great. We could use the excess to pay down the debt too.
There is an economic science we should follow to figure that out. I favor what the science says, whatever that may be
Didn’t read your previous post but surely you see that the current corporate tax rate isnt how we should be moving forward.See my post above for where we may find common ground.
We will not find common ground on my family paying even more in federal income taxes. The $400k+ I paid last year is more than enough. To suggest otherwise is absurd in my view.
or maybe its because i deal with a lying pos like you everyday...Things like this is why you're radicalized. You only dwell in the trash.
Didn’t read your previous post but surely you see that the current corporate tax rate isnt how we should be moving forward.
You should be more upset with that than the person who might pay little in taxes but also can’t afford to buy a home.
That’s a pretty broad generalization that lacks a lot of nuance. You are successful and that is great. You don’t need assistance from government in your life. Nor do I. It’s a blessed place to be.I addressed the corporate tax rate issue in my post you didn’t read. Though I’m not so sure the actual rate is the problem, but rather the lack of guardrails when the rate reduction was implemented (ie a lot went to stock buybacks).
In general, we should anchor around this. Government should be limited in scope. People should be self-sufficient. People should keep the vast majority of what they earn. These are basic concepts that 100% of Americans should agree on.
That’s a pretty broad generalization that lacks a lot of nuance. You are successful and that is great. You don’t need assistance from government in your life. Nor do I. It’s a blessed place to be.
We should all strive to be self sufficient for sure. But unfortunately life sometimes doesnt care about that and government is necessary to help balance society.
We just see it differently.
So your take is we should do nothing?They will get nowhere close to "savings" of $1 trillion. Even $1 trillion would not balance the budget nor eat into the debt. Therefore, no reduction in interest rates.
Compared to what he's doing, doing nothing would have been a more sound financial decision.So your take is we should do nothing?
I don't think that will win an election or fix our problems.
Compared to what he's doing, doing nothing would have been a more sound financial decision.
Ooooweee you think inflation was just a US thing huh.We don't take financial advice from democrats. They had the worst inflation in 50 years and then wanted to pass the massively inflationary BBB.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLWe don't take financial advice from democrats. They had the worst inflation in 50 years and then wanted to pass the massively inflationary BBB.
If they were good they wouldnt lose their jobs if those jobs was needed to begin with...Yay! Let's celebrate good public servants indiscriminately losing their jobs!![]()
Leftist bankrupt every country they takeover and the people are forced to eat their pets and cockroaches...We don't take financial advice from democrats. They had the worst inflation in 50 years and then wanted to pass the massively inflationary BBB.
LMAO, you obviously haven't been paying attention to their methodsIf they were good they wouldnt lose their jobs if those jobs was needed to begin with...
Listen to the rage. Trump wants to destroy California.
HmmmmmHmmmmm
A project that was to cost 33 Billion and be completed by 2020 is now projected to cost $330 Billion. Yeah, that's not worth inspection is it.
Especially considering the fact AMERICAN DON'T RIDE TRAINS!
What a waste.
We don’t have time to protect everyone’s feelings. The left will scream and lie no matter what they do.This isn’t about making the government smaller. If that was really the goal, agencies would have been told “cut this % of staff” and it would have been done in a measured thought out method ensuring needed skill set were kept using lawful methods. Instead this is surgery by sledgehammer; the end result may well be the death of the patient. As Russell Vought, the author of the “plan” said, the intent is to “traumatize the federal employees”. Of course the real intent is to pad the pockets of musk and company but who is counting.