This is the kind of good-faith, fallacy-free argument that would be perfect in the Political ThreadInteresting. Can you provide numbers that show comparable murder rates between the two? Considering the murder rate per capita in the cities this summer, it shouldn’t be hard to back up your claim that POC were hunted down in rural America by the hundreds.
Interesting. Can you provide numbers that show comparable murder rates between the two? Considering the murder rate per capita in the cities this summer, it shouldn’t be hard to back up your claim that POC were hunted down in rural America by the hundreds.
But its not open dialogue , you cant possibly believe that. Secondly " white nationalism" isn't a topic of great debate unless you are glued to far left media . I promise you if I ask my 9 employees " is White nationalism ever been discussed in your circle " the answer would be 9 " No's" This woke event sure isn't about open and honest dialogue .
True. But here’s the difference - was this lunatic an officially sanctioned speaker of the university? Similarly, did nearly every single other university in the country have dozens of likeminded hired speakers that students were encouraged to attend and listen to?
No?
Ugh, gross, right?founded by abolitionists
Those high murder rates are largely black on black crime so you're point is irrelevant to what I said.
So you don’t have any evidence. I know you don’t but it’s always great to see you clarify it.
Outside the student center at UK in the 90s/00s, in the "free speech area," nearly every day there was famously a loud mouthed preacher clutching a bible and screaming at everyone who walked by that we were going to burn in hell, calling girls whores, and spewing hatred and vitriol one fire and brimstone rant at a time.
We survived. The world survived. We all got thru it.
The noose department.One would think a trip to Walmart is all you'd need to see "Trumpsim" in all its glory.
I’m going to bail so here’s my last take here- I was born in the 70s and we were taught to base our views on MLK and civil rights movement. Content of character and not color. This movement emanating from the left is the exact opposite. It will have us all at each other’s throats at some point.
Economic disparity and police brutality are real issues but they won’t be solved by reverse racism and destruction of civil liberties.
This is social engineering to reshape society. It's more religion than politics, imo, and it's spreading like a virus. Maybe you may agree with this movement or maybe you DGAF, but it affects us all and needs open discussion. Why hide it in a single thread? Are you embarrassed by it?
How is it "hiding" if it's in a thread? That's the purpose of the thread.This is social engineering to reshape society. It's more religion than politics, imo, and it's spreading like a virus. Maybe you may agree with this movement or maybe you DGAF, but it affects us all and needs open discussion. Why hide it in a single thread? Are you embarrassed by it?
How is it "hiding" if it's in a thread? That's the purpose of the thread.
This is a "Colleges are teaching Liberalism" link from Fox News. Arguing it's not politics is zealotry at its finest. It's literally a liberal college teaching against Trumpism. That's the definition of politics.
You can't see it because you're obsessed with politics. Some people here don't want a dozen threads every day about every conservative talking point arguing that "This is really important! It's not politics, this is my life!" And the moderators of the board are supposed to be enforcing that norm, so I think it's important that when someone breaks that rule it gets called out.
The truth is likely that a huge number of the people here have been muted on facebook by their family because all they post is political zealotry and so no one is liking or engaging their posts, people at work are starting to avoid them, and they have to get their feelings off their chest, and a diary would be too girly, so they bring it here so the other outcasts can agree with them and fulfill their confirmation bias and make them feel better. Unfortunately the board's not supposed to be for that.
It's a good thing I don't care if you think it's weird or not.And yet, you continue to view and engage in the thread. Weird.
It's a good thing I don't care if you think it's weird or not.
I didn't say it to convince anyone, I said it because it's true. They know. You might know if it's you. They know their kids have them blocked on facebook. They know their friends at work are avoiding them for some reason. People who get obsessed with politics have it happen to them all the time. Because it's obnoxious behavior to steer every conversation towards politics. And it doesn't matter which "side" you're on if you're like that. It's obnoxious. And you can tell it's happening with people here on this board because they lack the self control to keep the politics where it's supposed to be. I don't have to convince anyone. They already know.Also a good thing that nobody cares if you think they are an outcast.
I didn't say it to convince anyone, I said it because it's true. They know. You might know if it's you. They know their kids have them blocked on facebook. They know their friends at work are avoiding them for some reason. People who get obsessed with politics have it happen to them all the time. Because it's obnoxious behavior to steer every conversation towards politics. And it doesn't matter which "side" you're on if you're like that. It's obnoxious. And you can tell it's happening with people here on this board because they lack the self control to keep the politics where it's supposed to be. I don't have to convince anyone. They already know.
OK, here's what I think. I think you know that "wokeism" cannot stand in the bright light of rational, critical examination. Trying to support it is like bringing a pea shooter to a gun fight. You know this as well. Since it's owned and driven by your political party, the cognitive dissonance rocks your worldview. So you want to sweep the discussion into a thread that doesn't openly expose your irrational thinking to a wider audience which may crumble the faulty structures you've built in your thinking.How is it "hiding" if it's in a thread? That's the purpose of the thread.
This is a "Colleges are teaching Liberalism" link from Fox News. Arguing it's not politics is zealotry at its finest. It's literally a liberal college teaching against Trumpism. That's the definition of politics.
You can't see it because you're obsessed with politics. Some people here don't want a dozen threads every day about every conservative talking point arguing that "This is really important! It's not politics, this is my life!" And the moderators of the board are supposed to be enforcing that norm, so I think it's important that when someone breaks that rule it gets called out.
The truth is likely that a huge number of the people here have been muted on facebook by their family because all they post is political zealotry and so no one is liking or engaging their posts, people at work are starting to avoid them, and they have to get their feelings off their chest, and a diary would be too girly, so they bring it here so the other outcasts can agree with them and fulfill their confirmation bias and make them feel better. Unfortunately the board's not supposed to be for that.
The RIGHT changed that for me starting in 2017. When you see how absolutely bat **** crazy they’ve become, yeah, I think it’s important to start speaking up more. Bad RIGHT WING ideas are a virus - they infect, replicate, kill, and move on. I don’t think anything I’ve said in this thread is unreasonable. But I do think most positions on the FAR RIGHT are based on false narratives and need to be confronted.
FIFY, which is why I dropped out of the Republican party a few weeks ago and became an independent.
FIFY, which is why I dropped out of the Republican party a few weeks ago (after 40 years as a Repub) and became an independent.
Had to be brother Jed and sister Cindy SmockTrue. But here’s the difference - was this lunatic an officially sanctioned speaker of the university? Similarly, did nearly every single other university in the country have dozens of likeminded hired speakers that students were encouraged to attend and listen to?
No?
What did that accomplish for you? You can vote for whomever you want regardless of registration outside of a primary.
I've seen your posts here. You get triggered way too easily if somebody says anything that can be perceived as anti-Democrat. There's no way you were a Republican for 40 years.
I saw those lunatics at UK back in 1980. Barrel of laughs. Jed was not only a religious nut, but apparently a Hoosier fan as well. "Bobby Knight is going to come down here and kick Joe Hall's ***!" or something like that.Had to be brother Jed and sister Cindy Smock
This is called "Challenge avoidance." It's when we avoid cognitive dissonance by rejecting disconforming information because it results in discomfort and negative emotions. Someone leaving the party like that is uncomfortable to the bias, so it's rejected as a lie.There's no way you were a Republican for 40 years.
Belief in western values = white nationalism
Can you define Western values?
Yep, sounds like they are open to open dialog. They will open with Orange man bad and white men are the devil.Not controversial at all...event name:
"White citizenship as terrorism: Make America Great Again, Again,"
So they have now said that the police officer (one) was killed at the demonstration instead of a stroke at the police station? Was not aware that had changed.There was an attempted coup and storming and defacing the nation's capital while killing police officers, but calling it terrorism is a bridge too far, for sure.
The problem is, they think that racism only works in one direction. That it's impossible to be racist towards white people.I get that. Their goal is to reinforce their position. But it’s a weak position and it could be effectively refuted.
1. Have them define racism.
2. Point to the title of the event.
FWIW Your employees are going to tell you what they think you want to hear.
I don't think many liberals would disagree with you about self-governance or individual rights like life, liberty, and property. I also don't think anyone cares if anyone wants to personally restrict their own liberty by following Judeo Christian values but they do have a problem with restricting someone else's liberty by enforcing Judeo Christian values through law.Sure. Belief in self governance, limited central government, societal and cultural norms based on Judeo-Christian values, and individual rights as enumerated in enlightenment ideals (life, liberty, property).
All viciously under attack by today’s left.