Imagine that! Wonder why they didn't just distill it down to the relevant evidence that everyone is waiting for - unredacted?
Epstein - The Epstein Files Act Is Now Law
- Thread starter fatpiggy
- Start date
Imagine that! Wonder why they didn't just distill it down to the relevant evidence that everyone is waiting for - unredacted?
I read that they are 97% documents that had already previously been released.
I am 100% sure that Trump would NOT BE ON THE CLIENT LIST BECAUSE OBAMA AND BIDEN HAD ACCESS TO THE FILES AND NEVER DROPPED A LIST
THE LIST WAS FULL OF DEMOCRATS AND POWERFUL PEOPLE AND WAS DESTROYED PROBABLY BY THE ROGUES IN THE FBI
JIM COMEY TO START
On the OK to lie
If we fired employees or didn’t elect someone for lying Washington DC would be a GHOST TOWN
Libs would sell their own children to Ghislaine for Trump to be implicated. LOL.
TDS will be studied for decades. It's the most fascinating mental illness of our time, and we are only beginning to understand any of it.
TDS will be studied for decades. It's the most fascinating mental illness of our time, and we are only beginning to understand any of it.
If releasing the files was going to exonerate trump they would have been released yesterday. Maybe the fact that Obama and Clinton had but didn't release any files was because they were protecting someone as well.
@dpic73
OK DUDE SO I can follow your argument using factual information instead of he said she said multiple times.
Please just provide me a video clip of AG Pam Bondi saying she had the list of clients on her desk
We can then start from that concrete information
Otherwise all this second hand heresy to me is worthless garbage dribble
OK DUDE SO I can follow your argument using factual information instead of he said she said multiple times.
Please just provide me a video clip of AG Pam Bondi saying she had the list of clients on her desk
We can then start from that concrete information
Otherwise all this second hand heresy to me is worthless garbage dribble
Better yet with the technology to create fake documents with the CIA and MOSSAD the named over the last 20 years could have been modified by anybody
Nazi Brainwashing and Indoctrination techniques used on TDS people who are programmed as literal zombie mindless humabots without free will or rational thought other than Trump bad Chaos Good
The question I asked of @dpic73 was provide me with a video clip of Pam Bondi saying she had the client list sitting on her desk
The clip you provided showed her saying the files were on her desk
First I would say that was impossible as 33,000 files would bury her desk
Secondly files are NOT A CLIENT LIST
So provide me that video showing her saying she has the Epstein client list on her desk.
I want to be as informed as you
Let me dumb it down for you. The interviewer asked her about hearing "the DOJ would be releasing the list of Epstein's clients, is that true?" She responded, "its on my desk to review right now" so if it wasn't on her desk, she lied, which makes her a POS. You're lying about it too.
Damn I can only dream of having a suck up like you defending my bad behavior, like you defend Donny T's corrupt, crime syndicate.
I still don't know why I was asked about this.
Last edited:
YOU HAVE CONFIRMED YOU DON'T HAVE CRAP AS TO A RECORDING OF PAM BONDI SAYING SHE HAS A CLIENT LIST
THAT MY FRIEND IS THE STORY OF YOUR LIFE
FABRICATION AND INUENDO WITH SUBSTANCE
SHOW ME THE VIDEO WHERE SHE SAYS SHE IS REVIEWING THE CLIENT LIST
Are you really trying to make this point? Your fellow posters on here were furious with Bondi for this lie when she said she didn't have a list.
It's really not debatable that she wasn't honest.
WUT? He asked her if she was going to release "THE LIST" of Jefferey Epstein's clients.
She responded "IT'S ON MY DESK TO REVIEW RIGHT NOW" What do you think "IT" pertains to?
I FEEL LIKE I'M TAKING CRAZY PILLS RIGHT NOW!
You got nothing but alleged unsubstantiated allegations from TDS folks that mean dog crap
Show me the video with her voice saying the I am reviewing the client list
You don't have it dude
The typical dpic73 argument
Show me the video with her voice saying the I am reviewing the client list
You don't have it dude
The typical dpic73 argument
Where has dpic been saying she said client list not the files?
Who knew that all those MAGA influencers who were raising hell about it had TDS?
Why do Trump's MAGA followers care so much about the Epstein files?
Ever since Jeffrey Epstein took his life in a federal jail in 2019, conservative voices have been calling on the federal government to be transparent about its probe.
abcnews.go.com
Megyn Kelly says Bondi ‘humiliated’ MAGA influencers with Epstein files
Pundit Megyn Kelly slammed Attorney General Pam Bondi for the “humiliation” the Justice Department handed right-wing social media influencers who buzzed about a “client list”…
thehill.com
Who knew that all those MAGA influencers who were raising hell about it had TDS?
Why do Trump's MAGA followers care so much about the Epstein files?
Ever since Jeffrey Epstein took his life in a federal jail in 2019, conservative voices have been calling on the federal government to be transparent about its probe.
Megyn Kelly says Bondi ‘humiliated’ MAGA influencers with Epstein files
Pundit Megyn Kelly slammed Attorney General Pam Bondi for the “humiliation” the Justice Department handed right-wing social media influencers who buzzed about a “client list”…
This is another topic that fascinates me. This is clearly an intelligence op, I’ve outlined it before. There will not be any list or additional information released. Israeli and US intelligence are, for better or worse, controlling this situation. Common sense would tell you that if Trump or frankly anyone associated with him were on the list it would have been released in the previous administration. This one seems very straight forward, yet theres a 28 page thread of finger pointing. IMO this is a diversion, just something to keep us busy. The thing we all are guilty of is bloodthirst. Both sides desperately want their opposing teams to be impacted or hurt here, when in fact there were real female victims that will never get justice. They’ve been overlooked and pushed aside. As a father I can’t fathom what they’re going through. This whole thing is terrible.
Several times and posts
She always referred to files
Help me out and show me the video having Bondi saying she is reviewing the client list
it does not exist
she did not say that
I like credible honest people who don’t fabricate narratives in spite of no truth to the narrative
You can chose who to believe and follow
I don’t follow innuendo or fake person believing what they say is the gospel because they peddle what they want people to believe
Who knew that all those MAGA influencers who were raising hell about it had TDS?
Why do Trump's MAGA followers care so much about the Epstein files?
Ever since Jeffrey Epstein took his life in a federal jail in 2019, conservative voices have been calling on the federal government to be transparent about its probe.
Megyn Kelly says Bondi ‘humiliated’ MAGA influencers with Epstein files
Pundit Megyn Kelly slammed Attorney General Pam Bondi for the “humiliation” the Justice Department handed right-wing social media influencers who buzzed about a “client list”…
Another Failure by Showing Unreliable Biased Information
It would be so much easier to have real discussions if you didn't say ridiculous stuff like this.
There was video shared, out of Bondi's own mouth claiming the files were on her desk.
At least admit that she was less than completely clear and honest. Universally MAGA influencers felt she was dishonest.
I mean, I used the search function and searched "Client list" and used his handle, and didn't see anything. Seems like you're doing the same semantics game to him. No one is saying she said the exact words. So you're arguing against air.
OK @UrHuckleberry I respect that you actually made an effort to verify MY CLAIM
Immediately following reading your post I did a quick visual search of Dpic73 posts starting from the posts in this thread
On July 25,2025 on post #10 of this thread dpic73 makes the reference to Pam Bondi says she had it , the client list , on her desk.
He has continued that narrative
Searches can miss information
Read for yourself
Holy hell gramps, you can hear it for yourself right here and if you claim that's not what she meant, you're a lunatic.
It is sitting on my desk to review
My interpretation was she has access to the files to review them but with 33,000 files they are NOT SITTING ON HER DESK
I did not hear her say the words Client List
I heard FILES
I agree with you that I AM A TRUTH LUNATIC
Fair enough, found it and attached it to quote. I had searched "Client List" so I guess it excluded just list.
I still think it is truly semantics. Here is the video he posted:
She is asked "The DOJ may releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients, will that really happen?"
She responds "IT is sitting on my desk right now to review"
The IT is said after she is asked if the DOJ is releasing the list of Epsteins clients. The sentence comes right after she is asked, using the phrase "list of clients".
So like, I guess you're saying she didn't say the specific words "I have the client list", but when asked "Do you have X?" And you reply, "It is on my desk" is someone crazy for making a CLEAR inference that X is what is on her desk?
Her interviewer said "THE CLIENT LIST" to which she responded "IT's sitting on my desk right now. What is IT Peepaw?
Also for a truth lunatic, I didn't hear her say files at all in her statement until she said MLK Files, and JFK files. FYI. She doesn't say files or list when talking about Epstein, just that "IT is on her desk to review"