I defended protest, the right to protest. I never defended violence of any kind or fascism. And I know you've heard me plenty of times say these speakers should be allowed. You are putting words in my mouth then drawing conclusions based on your own internal delusion. Get a grip. There's nothing wrong with student s protesting a speaker they disagree with, it's their campus. Violence is never a solution. I didn't think I had to say that.
You posted this:
And we should muzzle those liberals on college campuses using free speech to try and end free speech, because hate speech is free speech but opposition to hate speech is not free speech.
Did you not see Berkeley and the violence? Did you not know that Berkeley cancelled Coulter because of threats of violence? Did you not know a Portland parade was cancelled due to threats of violence? Are threats of violence free speech?
You absolutely appeared to defend violence or threats of violence to shut down speech. Protests are fine. No one has anything against that. But they must be peaceful and they must permit the speaker to actually speak, otherwise that is anti First Amendment. Libs are using both tactics.
Please find any example in the U.S. where conservatives are using threats to shut down speech.