No way in hell we go back to work April 1. There were 8,000 new cases in the US in the last 24 hrs. That number continues to climb. We will be lucky to get back to “normal” by May 1.America goes back to work April 1st, book it.
No way in hell we go back to work April 1. There were 8,000 new cases in the US in the last 24 hrs. That number continues to climb. We will be lucky to get back to “normal” by May 1.America goes back to work April 1st, book it.
No way in hell we go back to work April 1. There were 8,000 new cases in the US in the last 24 hrs. That number continues to climb. We will be lucky to get back to “normal” by May 1.
No way in hell we go back to work April 1. There were 8,000 new cases in the US in the last 24 hrs. That number continues to climb. We will be lucky to get back to “normal” by May 1.
Think you answered your own question.Does the media wish to provide accurate information about this virus, or sensationalize it to scare the hell out of everyone?
I'd almost guarantee we have a partial easing of the SIP orders to allow those considered less vulnerable (under 50 and no comorbidities) to return to work between 4/1 and 4/15.
I have seen several stories about people who are younger (below 50) who have succumbed to the disease. One had asthma/bronchitis when younger but had "grown out of it." Another had been tested but had not yet received her test back, was SIP, was well enough to walk around the block with her husband and dog the day before, but on Friday collapsed in her kitchen and died. Her husband, though, was sure it was COVID-19, and that's what the media reported.
So, one who had a comorbidity relating to his lungs, and another unconfirmed (but hubby insists!). Deaths among those less than 50 are by all accounts rare, but the media chooses to highlight and focus on the rare instances. Does the media wish to provide accurate information about this virus, or sensationalize it to scare the hell out of everyone?
If you read the history of the Spanish flu the initial strain that spring was relatively mild. However it mutated and changed and by fall it was killing people within hours to a few days of onset.I'd almost guarantee we have a partial easing of the SIP orders to allow those considered less vulnerable (under 50 and no comorbidities) to return to work between 4/1 and 4/15.
I have seen several stories about people who are younger (below 50) who have succumbed to the disease. One had asthma/bronchitis when younger but had "grown out of it." Another had been tested but had not yet received her test back, was SIP, was well enough to walk around the block with her husband and dog the day before, but on Friday collapsed in her kitchen and died. Her husband, though, was sure it was COVID-19, and that's what the media reported.
So, one who had a comorbidity relating to his lungs, and another unconfirmed (but hubby insists!). Deaths among those less than 50 are by all accounts rare, but the media chooses to highlight and focus on the rare instances. Does the media wish to provide accurate information about this virus, or sensationalize it to scare the hell out of everyone?
Perhaps unlike the NBA, they are uninsured.
Your proposed solution: “test and treat them” sounds like a prescription or acceptance of socialized medicine.
Actually I’m making the opposite of your point. Do you want HIV? No you don’t do you? It can kill you and we all know this right? We don’t understand HIV and we don’t test every human for it. So why would anyone want a virus and blow it off if you know it’s something that kills people and we don’t have a cure. And identifying positive cases is huge for future prevention. You can isolate the people that have it and it cannot be spread to those around them. I’m all for testing everyone who wants it.
I'd almost guarantee we have a partial easing of the SIP orders to allow those considered less vulnerable (under 50 and no comorbidities) to return to work between 4/1 and 4/15.
I have seen several stories about people who are younger (below 50) who have succumbed to the disease. One had asthma/bronchitis when younger but had "grown out of it." Another had been tested but had not yet received her test back, was SIP, was well enough to walk around the block with her husband and dog the day before, but on Friday collapsed in her kitchen and died. Her husband, though, was sure it was COVID-19, and that's what the media reported.
So, one who had a comorbidity relating to his lungs, and another unconfirmed (but hubby insists!). Deaths among those less than 50 are by all accounts rare, but the media chooses to highlight and focus on the rare instances. Does the media wish to provide accurate information about this virus, or sensationalize it to scare the hell out of everyone?
You asked "what should we treat them with?"
Are you implying that in your hospital you don't treat patients with this virus because there is no "magic wand"?
What do you do for the people who come in and are experiencing symptoms but can't get a test?
Do you ignore them until they get a test?
No way in hell the US isn't permanently damaged if we stay completely shut down until May 1st. America goes back to work in April.
baller cal says it will be permanently damaged...
Those nations in the end had the highest mortality rates
How much you want to bet??No way in hell we go back to work April 1. There were 8,000 new cases in the US in the last 24 hrs. That number continues to climb. We will be lucky to get back to “normal” by May 1.
But we were dumber back thenI saw a comparative study of Philadelphia and St. Louis and their treatment of the Spanish flu. Philly continued parades, etc., and had a massive spike and much higher death rate than did St. Louis
But we were dumber back then
lots and lots of stupid out there.
Another prophet of disaster who says this ship is lost. Another prophet of disaster leaving you to count the cost.No way in hell we go back to work April 1. There were 8,000 new cases in the US in the last 24 hrs. That number continues to climb. We will be lucky to get back to “normal” by May 1.
BookedLast week Bill Hemmer said South Korea was the model we wanted at 1.2% death rate. Now, today, the death rate in New York is .93 percent....The two week shutdown was necessary and is having great effects. America goes back to work April 1st, book it.
Another prophet of disaster who says this ship is lost. Another prophet of disaster leaving you to count the cost.
Taunting us with visions, afflicting us with fear.
Predicting war* for millions in the hope that one appears.
*- in this case, substitute "bubonic plague" for "war".
Things arent going back to normal april 1st. guess you lost this argument.
It’s amazing to see the brevity of time between some of these posts. Last Wednesday was 5 days, ago, and the disease has left the opinion expressed badly in the dust.
If one thing comes from this, I hope we can forge a national strategy to disengage from China and their wet markets, forever.
we need not depend on another country as much as we do. but I think we should disengage from china because they killed their people for having a fever.... I know someone over there who got out and went to Taiwan ...... they welded buildings shut and let them starve to death healthy or not... and people that went out in public with a fever were taken away or shot.. Their government isnt even human it seems.
We have people in this country advocating for their form of government. That may be as frightening.
That's a fair point. The Chinese regime is officially Communist, but is actually just a totalitarian government with both fascist and communist elements and I haven't heard of the American far left clamoring for a Chinese style regime, although the MSM will occasionally parrot some Chinese government talking points (my favorite is a NYT opinion piece explaining how China bought the world some time to deal with the coronavirus, an absolutely ludicrous piece of propaganda). The American Hard Left is generally more in tune with supporting models which work so well in Cuba and Venezuela opposed to those in China.
The Bernie left is far more capitalist than Cuba or Venezuela and is more akin to a European left party.
Perhaps you are correct, and perhaps there's a just a perception that Bernie (and, by proxy, his bros) is a tad too fond of Castro. That negative perception is not helped, though, when Bernie sings the praises of Castro's literacy program (the merits of said program are actually quite debatable). How would a conservative contemporary politician be perceived if he or she made it point to discuss Mussolini's success in making trains run on time? I can only imagine how much fun the media would have with that one!I haven't seen anybody outside of some fringe twitter accounts that are truly marxist supporting things like nationalization of oil and gas industry, land reform, price and currency controls, or anything resembling an end to private enterprise. The Bernie left is far more capitalist than Cuba or Venezuela and is more akin to a European left party.
How would a conservative contemporary politician be perceived if he or she made it point to discuss Mussolini's success in making trains run on time? I can only imagine how much fun the media would have with that one!
I didn't know that, but I assume that he more had sense than to make note that it was a Mussolini statement (assuming that he knew it was a Mussolini statement; who doesn't quote things from time to time without being aware of the source)?Trump actually tweeted a statement that originated from Mussolini early during his campaign, and caught some **** for it.
I didn't know that, but I assume that he more had sense than to make note that it was a Mussolini statement (assuming that he knew it was a Mussolini statement; who doesn't quote things from time to time without being aware of the source)?
I think he said he did not know it was from Mussolini.
The quote was to the effect of: “I’d rather live a day as a Lion, than a year as a sheep.”